Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:59:02PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > But don't we already discussed this issue? I think that RUSAGE_SELF
> > case always not 100% accurate, so it is Ok to ignore this race.
>
> Take the case when an exiting thread has a large utime stime value, and
> rusage reports utime before thread exit and stime after thread exit... the
> result would look wierd.
> So IMHO, while inaccuracies in task_struct->xxx time can be tolerated, it
> might not be such a good idea to for task_struct->signal->xxx counters.
Yes, you are right. Now I don't understand why I didn't understand this
before. Thank you, Ravikiran.
Oleg.