From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
An incorrect sizeof() is being used, sizeof(rhub->ports) is not
correct, it should be sizeof(*rhub->ports). This bug did not
cause any issues because it just so happens the sizes are the same.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Sizeof not portable (SIZEOF_MISMATCH)")
Fixes: bcaa9d5c5900 ("xhci: Create new structures to store xhci port information")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index fe405cd38dbc..138ba4528dd3 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -2252,8 +2252,8 @@ static void xhci_create_rhub_port_array(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
if (!rhub->num_ports)
return;
- rhub->ports = kcalloc_node(rhub->num_ports, sizeof(rhub->ports), flags,
- dev_to_node(dev));
+ rhub->ports = kcalloc_node(rhub->num_ports, sizeof(*rhub->ports),
+ flags, dev_to_node(dev));
for (i = 0; i < HCS_MAX_PORTS(xhci->hcs_params1); i++) {
if (xhci->hw_ports[i].rhub != rhub ||
xhci->hw_ports[i].hcd_portnum == DUPLICATE_ENTRY)
--
2.27.0
On 8.10.2020 20.11, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>
> An incorrect sizeof() is being used, sizeof(rhub->ports) is not
> correct, it should be sizeof(*rhub->ports). This bug did not
> cause any issues because it just so happens the sizes are the same.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Sizeof not portable (SIZEOF_MISMATCH)")
> Fixes: bcaa9d5c5900 ("xhci: Create new structures to store xhci port information")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> ---
Thanks, added
-Mathias