Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>
> __exit_signal
> cleanup_sighand(tsk);
> kmem_cache_free(sighand)
> spin_unlock(sighand->lock)
>
> It looked suspicious to me until I realised sighand cache now had
> SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU. Can we please add comments (at cleanup_sighand or
> __exit_signal) to make it a bit clearer for people like me :)
Yes, this is really confusing, see also
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114089590923893
I'll send a cleanup patch soon.
> How is the following patch to avoid tasklist lock completely at getrusage?
I think this patch is correct, thanks.
Oleg.