In function mgag200_set_pci_regs, there are some switch cases
returned, then break. These break will never run.
This patch is to make the code a bit readable.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
index 38672f9e5c4f..de873a5d276e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
@@ -794,20 +794,17 @@ static int mgag200_crtc_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
case G200_SE_A:
case G200_SE_B:
return mga_g200se_set_plls(mdev, clock);
- break;
case G200_WB:
case G200_EW3:
return mga_g200wb_set_plls(mdev, clock);
- break;
case G200_EV:
return mga_g200ev_set_plls(mdev, clock);
- break;
case G200_EH:
case G200_EH3:
return mga_g200eh_set_plls(mdev, clock);
- break;
case G200_ER:
return mga_g200er_set_plls(mdev, clock);
+ default:
break;
}
--
2.28.0
Hi
On 23.10.20 09:00, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> In function mgag200_set_pci_regs, there are some switch cases
> returned, then break. These break will never run.
> This patch is to make the code a bit readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> index 38672f9e5c4f..de873a5d276e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> @@ -794,20 +794,17 @@ static int mgag200_crtc_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
> case G200_SE_A:
> case G200_SE_B:
> return mga_g200se_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> - break;
> case G200_WB:
> case G200_EW3:
> return mga_g200wb_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> - break;
> case G200_EV:
> return mga_g200ev_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> - break;
> case G200_EH:
> case G200_EH3:
> return mga_g200eh_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> - break;
> case G200_ER:
> return mga_g200er_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> + default:
No default case here. If one of the enum values is not handled by the
switch, the compiler should warn about it.
Best regards
Thomas
> break;
> }
>
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
From: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Date: 2020-10-23 15:13:30
To: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>,Dave Airlie <[email protected]>,David Airlie <[email protected]>,Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/mgag200:remove break after return>Hi
>
>On 23.10.20 09:00, Bernard Zhao wrote:
>> In function mgag200_set_pci_regs, there are some switch cases
>> returned, then break. These break will never run.
>> This patch is to make the code a bit readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>> index 38672f9e5c4f..de873a5d276e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>> @@ -794,20 +794,17 @@ static int mgag200_crtc_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
>> case G200_SE_A:
>> case G200_SE_B:
>> return mga_g200se_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> - break;
>> case G200_WB:
>> case G200_EW3:
>> return mga_g200wb_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> - break;
>> case G200_EV:
>> return mga_g200ev_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> - break;
>> case G200_EH:
>> case G200_EH3:
>> return mga_g200eh_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> - break;
>> case G200_ER:
>> return mga_g200er_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> + default:
>
>No default case here. If one of the enum values is not handled by the
>switch, the compiler should warn about it.
Hi
For this point I was a little confused, about this switch variable "mdev->type", my understanding is that this variable`s value can be certain only when the code is running.
How does the compiler warn this("If one of the enum values is not handled") before the code runs?
BR//Bernard
>Best regards
>Thomas
>
>> break;
>> }
>>
>>
>
>--
>Thomas Zimmermann
>Graphics Driver Developer
>SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Hi
On 23.10.20 09:48, Bernard wrote:
>
>
> From: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> Date: 2020-10-23 15:13:30
> To: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>,Dave Airlie <[email protected]>,David Airlie <[email protected]>,Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/mgag200:remove break after return>Hi
>>
>> On 23.10.20 09:00, Bernard Zhao wrote:
>>> In function mgag200_set_pci_regs, there are some switch cases
>>> returned, then break. These break will never run.
>>> This patch is to make the code a bit readable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 +----
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>>> index 38672f9e5c4f..de873a5d276e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>>> @@ -794,20 +794,17 @@ static int mgag200_crtc_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
>>> case G200_SE_A:
>>> case G200_SE_B:
>>> return mga_g200se_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>>> - break;
>>> case G200_WB:
>>> case G200_EW3:
>>> return mga_g200wb_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>>> - break;
>>> case G200_EV:
>>> return mga_g200ev_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>>> - break;
>>> case G200_EH:
>>> case G200_EH3:
>>> return mga_g200eh_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>>> - break;
>>> case G200_ER:
>>> return mga_g200er_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>>> + default:
>>
>> No default case here. If one of the enum values is not handled by the
>> switch, the compiler should warn about it.
>
> Hi
>
> For this point I was a little confused, about this switch variable "mdev->type", my understanding is that this variable`s value can be certain only when the code is running.
> How does the compiler warn this("If one of the enum values is not handled") before the code runs?
The enum mga_type {} has values (G200_ER, G200_WB, etc) that are known
to the compiler. If one of those values does not show up in the switch
statement, the compiler warns. Adding default would silence this warning.
In principle, mdev->type could contain any value that fits into an int.
But assigning anything that is not listed in enum mga_type {} is
considered an error as well.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> BR//Bernard
>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Zimmermann
>> Graphics Driver Developer
>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>> Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Hi Bernard.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 03:48:49PM +0800, Bernard wrote:
>
>
> From: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> Date: 2020-10-23 15:13:30
> To: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>,Dave Airlie <[email protected]>,David Airlie <[email protected]>,Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/mgag200:remove break after return>Hi
> >
> >On 23.10.20 09:00, Bernard Zhao wrote:
> >> In function mgag200_set_pci_regs, there are some switch cases
> >> returned, then break. These break will never run.
> >> This patch is to make the code a bit readable.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 +----
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> >> index 38672f9e5c4f..de873a5d276e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> >> @@ -794,20 +794,17 @@ static int mgag200_crtc_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
> >> case G200_SE_A:
> >> case G200_SE_B:
> >> return mga_g200se_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> >> - break;
> >> case G200_WB:
> >> case G200_EW3:
> >> return mga_g200wb_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> >> - break;
> >> case G200_EV:
> >> return mga_g200ev_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> >> - break;
> >> case G200_EH:
> >> case G200_EH3:
> >> return mga_g200eh_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> >> - break;
> >> case G200_ER:
> >> return mga_g200er_set_plls(mdev, clock);
> >> + default:
> >
> >No default case here. If one of the enum values is not handled by the
> >switch, the compiler should warn about it.
>
> Hi
>
> For this point I was a little confused, about this switch variable "mdev->type", my understanding is that this variable`s value can be certain only when the code is running.
> How does the compiler warn this("If one of the enum values is not handled") before the code runs?
If the switch/case does not include "G200_ER" then the compiler can see
one enum value is missing from the list and can warn.
As a test - Try to drop the default and drop G200_ER - then the
compiler (hopefully) will warn.
Sam
From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
Date: 2020-10-25 01:14:57
To: Bernard <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>,[email protected],David Airlie <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected],Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/mgag200:remove break after return>Hi Bernard.
>
>On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 03:48:49PM +0800, Bernard wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>> Date: 2020-10-23 15:13:30
>> To: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>,Dave Airlie <[email protected]>,David Airlie <[email protected]>,Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm/mgag200:remove break after return>Hi
>> >
>> >On 23.10.20 09:00, Bernard Zhao wrote:
>> >> In function mgag200_set_pci_regs, there are some switch cases
>> >> returned, then break. These break will never run.
>> >> This patch is to make the code a bit readable.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 5 +----
>> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>> >> index 38672f9e5c4f..de873a5d276e 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
>> >> @@ -794,20 +794,17 @@ static int mgag200_crtc_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
>> >> case G200_SE_A:
>> >> case G200_SE_B:
>> >> return mga_g200se_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> >> - break;
>> >> case G200_WB:
>> >> case G200_EW3:
>> >> return mga_g200wb_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> >> - break;
>> >> case G200_EV:
>> >> return mga_g200ev_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> >> - break;
>> >> case G200_EH:
>> >> case G200_EH3:
>> >> return mga_g200eh_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> >> - break;
>> >> case G200_ER:
>> >> return mga_g200er_set_plls(mdev, clock);
>> >> + default:
>> >
>> >No default case here. If one of the enum values is not handled by the
>> >switch, the compiler should warn about it.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> For this point I was a little confused, about this switch variable "mdev->type", my understanding is that this variable`s value can be certain only when the code is running.
>> How does the compiler warn this("If one of the enum values is not handled") before the code runs?
>
>If the switch/case does not include "G200_ER" then the compiler can see
>one enum value is missing from the list and can warn.
>As a test - Try to drop the default and drop G200_ER - then the
>compiler (hopefully) will warn.
Hi, Sam & Thomas：
Thank you very much for your kind comments, I learned new useful knowledge.
I will resubmit the patch.
BR//Bernard
> Sam