I have noticed that scsi_do_req has apparently been obsoleted in 2.6.18
and above. Is scst and target support for FC-AL going to
remain supported and/or merged at some point? If so, what is planned
for scst support for later kernels?
Jeff
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> I have noticed that scsi_do_req has apparently been obsoleted in 2.6.18
> and above. Is scst and target support for FC-AL going to
> remain supported and/or merged at some point? If so, what is planned
> for scst support for later kernels?
Jeff, I don't know why you ask here and not in scst-devel mailing list,
but SCST has beed updated to use scsi_execute_async() instead of
scsi_do_req() in 2.6.18+ for quite a while. Yes, scst is going to be
supported in the future.
Vlad
> Jeff
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
>
>>I have noticed that scsi_do_req has apparently been obsoleted in 2.6.18
>>and above. Is scst and target support for FC-AL going to
>>remain supported and/or merged at some point? If so, what is planned
>>for scst support for later kernels?
>>
>>
>
>Jeff, I don't know why you ask here and not in scst-devel mailing list,
>but SCST has beed updated to use scsi_execute_async() instead of
>scsi_do_req() in 2.6.18+ for quite a while. Yes, scst is going to be
>supported in the future.
>
>Vlad
>
>
The code is not at sourceforge on your project site with these updates
for 2.6.18. Where is the 2.6.18 version currently hosted?
P.S. I will post this to the scsi list in the future.
Thanks
Jeff
>
>
>>Jeff
>>-
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>the body of a message to [email protected]
>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
>
>>Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have noticed that scsi_do_req has apparently been obsoleted in 2.6.18
>>>and above. Is scst and target support for FC-AL going to
>>>remain supported and/or merged at some point? If so, what is planned
>>>for scst support for later kernels?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Jeff, I don't know why you ask here and not in scst-devel mailing list,
>>but SCST has beed updated to use scsi_execute_async() instead of
>>scsi_do_req() in 2.6.18+ for quite a while. Yes, scst is going to be
>>supported in the future.
>>
>>Vlad
>>
>>
>
> The code is not at sourceforge on your project site with these updates
> for 2.6.18. Where is the 2.6.18 version currently hosted?
It is there on http://sourceforge.net/projects/scst
(http://scst.sourceforge.net/). See 0.9.5 release version as well as
development code in the SVN.
Vlad
> P.S. I will post this to the scsi list in the future.
For scst only questions scst-devel on lists.sourceforge.net would be better.
> Thanks
>
> Jeff
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jeff
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>>the body of a message to [email protected]
>>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>The code is not at sourceforge on your project site with these updates
>>for 2.6.18. Where is the 2.6.18 version currently hosted?
>>
>>
>
>It is there on http://sourceforge.net/projects/scst
>(http://scst.sourceforge.net/). See 0.9.5 release version as well as
>development code in the SVN.
>
>Vlad
>
>
>
Released 12/01/2006 - now I know why I missed it there -- you just
released it. :-)
>>P.S. I will post this to the scsi list in the future.
>>
>>
>
>For scst only questions scst-devel on lists.sourceforge.net would be better.
>
>
>
Ok. Thanks for the prompt response. I will be testing your code today at
4Gb. Let you know if it works.
:-)
Jeff