2006-12-18 21:04:00

by David Milburn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] libata-scsi: ata_task_ioctl should return ATA registers from sense data

User applications using the HDIO_DRIVE_TASK ioctl through libata
expect specific ATA registers to be returned to userspace. Verified
that ata_task_ioctl correctly returns register values to the
smartctl application.

Signed-off-by: David Milburn <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index a4790be..1966294 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -273,8 +273,8 @@ int ata_task_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, void __user *arg)
{
int rc = 0;
u8 scsi_cmd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
- u8 args[7];
- struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ u8 args[7], *sensebuf = NULL;
+ int cmd_result;

if (arg == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -282,10 +282,14 @@ int ata_task_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, void __user *arg)
if (copy_from_user(args, arg, sizeof(args)))
return -EFAULT;

+ sensebuf = kzalloc(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, GFP_NOIO);
+ if (!sensebuf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
memset(scsi_cmd, 0, sizeof(scsi_cmd));
scsi_cmd[0] = ATA_16;
scsi_cmd[1] = (3 << 1); /* Non-data */
- /* scsi_cmd[2] is already 0 -- no off.line, cc, or data xfer */
+ scsi_cmd[2] = 0x20; /* cc but no off.line or data xfer */
scsi_cmd[4] = args[1];
scsi_cmd[6] = args[2];
scsi_cmd[8] = args[3];
@@ -295,11 +299,46 @@ int ata_task_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, void __user *arg)

/* Good values for timeout and retries? Values below
from scsi_ioctl_send_command() for default case... */
- if (scsi_execute_req(scsidev, scsi_cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL, 0, &sshdr,
- (10*HZ), 5))
+ cmd_result = scsi_execute(scsidev, scsi_cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL, 0,
+ sensebuf, (10*HZ), 5, 0);
+
+ if (driver_byte(cmd_result) == DRIVER_SENSE) {/* sense data available */
+ u8 *desc = sensebuf + 8;
+ cmd_result &= ~(0xFF<<24); /* DRIVER_SENSE is not an error */
+
+ /* If we set cc then ATA pass-through will cause a
+ * check condition even if no error. Filter that. */
+ if (cmd_result & SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION) {
+ struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
+ scsi_normalize_sense(sensebuf, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE,
+ &sshdr);
+ if (sshdr.sense_key==0 &&
+ sshdr.asc==0 && sshdr.ascq==0)
+ cmd_result &= ~SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
+ }
+
+ /* Send userspace ATA registers */
+ if (sensebuf[0] == 0x72 && /* format is "descriptor" */
+ desc[0] == 0x09) { /* code is "ATA Descriptor" */
+ args[0] = desc[13]; /* status */
+ args[1] = desc[3]; /* error */
+ args[2] = desc[5]; /* sector count (0:7) */
+ args[3] = desc[7]; /* lbal */
+ args[4] = desc[9]; /* lbam */
+ args[5] = desc[11]; /* lbah */
+ args[6] = desc[12]; /* select */
+ if (copy_to_user(arg, args, sizeof(args)))
+ rc = -EFAULT;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (cmd_result) {
rc = -EIO;
+ goto error;
+ }

- /* Need code to retrieve data from check condition? */
+ error:
+ kfree(sensebuf);
return rc;
}


2006-12-19 07:29:45

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-scsi: ata_task_ioctl should return ATA registers from sense data

David Milburn wrote:
> User applications using the HDIO_DRIVE_TASK ioctl through libata
> expect specific ATA registers to be returned to userspace. Verified
> that ata_task_ioctl correctly returns register values to the
> smartctl application.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Milburn <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

--
tejun

2006-12-20 19:21:51

by Jeff Garzik

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-scsi: ata_task_ioctl should return ATA registers from sense data

David Milburn wrote:
> User applications using the HDIO_DRIVE_TASK ioctl through libata
> expect specific ATA registers to be returned to userspace. Verified
> that ata_task_ioctl correctly returns register values to the
> smartctl application.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Milburn <[email protected]>

ACK, but fails to apply to libata-dev.git#upstream-fixes:


[jgarzik@pretzel libata-dev]$ git-applymbox /g/tmp/mbox ~/info/signoff.txt
1 patch(es) to process.

Applying 'libata-scsi: ata_task_ioctl should return ATA registers from
sense data'

fatal: corrupt patch at line 83