2024-02-13 15:09:49

by Hannes Reinecke

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 08/14] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement

On 2/13/24 10:37, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <[email protected]>
>
> As we don't have a way to split a folio to a any given lower folio
> order yet, avoid splitting the folio in split_huge_page_to_list() if it
> has a minimum folio order requirement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 94c958f7ebb5..d897efc51025 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3026,6 +3026,19 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Do not split if mapping has minimum folio order
> + * requirement.
> + *
> + * XXX: Once we have support for splitting to any lower
> + * folio order, then it could be split based on the
> + * min_folio_order.
> + */
> + if (mapping_min_folio_order(mapping)) {
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> gfp = current_gfp_context(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) &
> GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>

Cheers,

Hannes