Hello, I attach changelog and the patch as plain text here.
This patch fixes a typo in a comment of kernel/futex.c, changing 'even through' for 'even though'.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <[email protected]>
---
kernel/futex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 00febd6dea9c..f8035bb11265 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2851,7 +2851,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
/*
* On PREEMPT_RT_FULL, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
* hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will
- * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in
+ * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even though we'll not in
* fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK
* and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
*
--
2.25.1
On Monday, April 26, 2021 5:11:38 PM EDT Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 00febd6dea9c..f8035bb11265 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -2851,7 +2851,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned
> int flags,
> /*
> * On PREEMPT_RT_FULL, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
> * hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will
> - * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in
> + * include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even though we'll not in
> * fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK
> * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
> *