Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the
system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
Thanks a lot for the patches.
PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
Celso wrote:
> Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
> kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the
> system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
> Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
> needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
>
> Thanks a lot for the patches.
>
> PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
>
Hi there,
have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
consoles, ...).
The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
--
Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu:
> Celso wrote:
> > Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
> > kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the
> > system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
> > Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
> > needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the patches.
> >
> > PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
> >
>
> Hi there,
>
> have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
>
> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
> consoles, ...).
> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
>
>
> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
>
>
>
> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
>
> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
>
Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before
2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No
problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much
difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but
in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more
"fluid"*.
* direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well
Celso wrote:
> Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu:
>> Celso wrote:
>>> Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
>>> kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the
>>> system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
>>> Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
>>> needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the patches.
>>>
>>> PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
>>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
>>
>> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
>> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
>> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
>> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
>> consoles, ...).
>> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
>> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
>> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
>>
>>
>> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
>> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
>>
>> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
>> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
>>
>
> Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before
> 2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No
> problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much
> difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but
> in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more
> "fluid"*.
>
> * direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well
>
I don't know if there is an official announcement of patch releases but
today i spotted and started to use the new 2.6.22-rc4-ck1.
The list of patches included on 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 it's on
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-ck1/patches/
It's working...
--
Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
Hi there,
After a lot of good feedback about the -ck patch from Celso Ramos, I
decided to try my chances and see for myself the difference.
I had a few problems to struggle first, but nothing to do with ck...
When I finally rebooted my Pentium4 computer, I truly noticed a
difference in the loading time of the operating system. I can be
mistaken, but it appeared to me a gain of 1,50 % of the loading speed.
On a graphic environment the changes are more difficult to notice, and
I may be wrong if I say it's faster, just because I'm expecting to see
speed improvements.
By the way, I'm using it on a 2.6.21 kernel.
Many thanks to the developers,
Miguel Pais
On 6/10/07, Miguel Figueiredo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Celso wrote:
> > S?b, 2007-06-09 ?s 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu:
> >> Celso wrote:
> >>> Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
> >>> kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the
> >>> system was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
> >>> Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
> >>> needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for the patches.
> >>>
> >>> PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
> >>>
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
> >>
> >> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
> >> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
> >> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
> >> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
> >> consoles, ...).
> >> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
> >> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
> >> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
> >>
> >>
> >> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
> >> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
> >>
> >> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
> >> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
> >>
> >
> > Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before
> > 2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No
> > problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much
> > difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but
> > in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more
> > "fluid"*.
> >
> > * direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well
> >
>
> I don't know if there is an official announcement of patch releases but
> today i spotted and started to use the new 2.6.22-rc4-ck1.
>
> The list of patches included on 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 it's on
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-ck1/patches/
>
> It's working...
>
>
> --
>
> Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
>
> Miguel Figueiredo
> http://www.DebianPT.org
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>