Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
Unclassified
Subject : nanosleep(0) behaviour
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/239
Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <[email protected]>
Handled-By : Gary Zambrano <[email protected]>
Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Subject : Kernel hang on CMOS_READ
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/3/138
Submitter : Rodrigo Luiz <[email protected]>
Status : Unknown
Subject : Device hang when offlining a CPU due to IRQ misrouting
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/31/419
Submitter : Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Handled-By : Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Subject : long freezes on thinkpad t60
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100
Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Status : problem is being debugged
Regards,
Michal
--
"Najbardziej brakowa?o mi twojego milczenia."
-- Andrzej Sapkowski "Co? wi?cej"
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:40 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Subject : nanosleep(0) behaviour
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/239
> Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <[email protected]>
> Handled-By : Gary Zambrano <[email protected]>
> Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Status : problem is being debugged
Please remove this. The behavior is correct and it just affects buggy
applications like iperf, which used usleep(0) as a yield. iperf is fixed
by now.
tglx
Hi!
Can we add 'writing to /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points' no longer
works to the list? Len did it intentionally but that does not make it
right. People are using it and we did not go through deprecation
period. Plus there's no reasonable alternative.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:02:22 +0000 Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can we add 'writing to /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points' no longer
> works to the list?
I thought we had.
> Len did it intentionally but that does not make it
> right. People are using it and we did not go through deprecation
> period. Plus there's no reasonable alternative.
Was that writeability causing any actual problems in 2.6.21?
Andrew Morton pisze:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:02:22 +0000 Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can we add 'writing to /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points' no longer
>> works to the list?
>
> I thought we had.
Len rejected this bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8495
>
>> Len did it intentionally but that does not make it
>> right. People are using it and we did not go through deprecation
>> period. Plus there's no reasonable alternative.
>
> Was that writeability causing any actual problems in 2.6.21?
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/