Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc4
with patches available.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
Networking
Subject : no irda0 interface (2.6.21 was OK), smsc does not find chip
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/3/16
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <[email protected]>
Handled-By : Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/7/237
Status : patch was suggested
SELinux
Subject : very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/4/78
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Handled-By : Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
James Morris <[email protected]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/7/334
Status : patch available
USB
Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
Status : patch was suggested
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> USB
>
> Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but
> was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
> Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> Status : patch was suggested
I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > USB
> >
> > Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but
> > was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> > Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
> > Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> > Status : patch was suggested
>
> I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch
should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our
queries, we can't be certain.
Alan Stern
A Wednesday 13 June 2007 21:35:02, Greg KH escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > USB
> >
> > Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794),
> > but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> > Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
> > Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> > Status : patch was suggested
>
> I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No I haven't fix the problem... I'am waiting for a friend that is in
holiday's and work's with linux well. I'am beginer in linux and I can't put
the patch to work, because of that I'am waiting for him to see if the patch
work.
Sorry, the fact I don't say anything about the problem but my friend comes
this week and them we put the patch and I will tell something!!
Regards, Paulo.
A Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:01:54, Alan Stern escreveu:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > > USB
> > >
> > > Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next
> > > (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at
> > > lib/list_debug.c:33 References :
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> > > Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
> > > Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> > > Status : patch was suggested
> >
> > I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> > that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
>
> I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch
> should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our
> queries, we can't be certain.
>
> Alan Stern
Hi, I'am writting for tell that the patch work well, I have Ktorrent working
for 3 days and there is no Kernel Panic!!!! But I'am using Kernel 2.6.22-rc4
with the patch that you send!!
Thank you, Paulo
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:48:27AM +0100, Paulo Pereira wrote:
> A Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:01:54, Alan Stern escreveu:
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > > > USB
> > > >
> > > > Subject : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next
> > > > (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at
> > > > lib/list_debug.c:33 References :
> > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> > > > Submitter : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
> > > > Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> > > > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> > > > Status : patch was suggested
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> > > that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?
> >
> > I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch
> > should have fixed it. But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our
> > queries, we can't be certain.
> >
> > Alan Stern
>
> Hi, I'am writting for tell that the patch work well, I have Ktorrent working
> for 3 days and there is no Kernel Panic!!!! But I'am using Kernel 2.6.22-rc4
> with the patch that you send!!
Ok, it's queued up for after 2.6.22 is out as it is not a regression and
is kind of intrusive.
Unless others think it should go in now?
thanks,
greg k-h