Hi,
The function of_get_named_gpiod_flags in older versions of the kernel
(up to 4.7.10 - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.7.10/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L75 )
contained an important workaround:
/* .of_xlate might decide to not fill in the flags, so clear it. */if (flags)
*flags = 0; Unfortunately, newer kernels do not contain it. Therefore if the
"xlat" function in the gpiochip driver does not set flags, (like e.g.
the Xilinx AXI GPIO driver: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/blob/c2ba891326bb472da59b6a2da29aca218d337687/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c#L262 )
the random, unitialized value from the stack in of_find_gpio
( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18.13/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L228 )
is used, which results in random settings of e.g., OPEN DRAIN or OPEN SOURCE mode.
I have also reported the problem in the Xilinx forum: https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Linux/Bug-in-of-get-named-gpiod-flags-function-in-the-kernel-random/td-p/897695
With best regards,
Wojciech Zabolotny
[adding linux-gpio + Linus W.]
On 10/10/18 9:13 AM, wzab wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The function of_get_named_gpiod_flags in older versions of the kernel
> (up to 4.7.10 - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.7.10/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L75 )
> contained an important workaround:
>
> /* .of_xlate might decide to not fill in the flags, so clear it. */if (flags)
> *flags = 0; Unfortunately, newer kernels do not contain it. Therefore if the
> "xlat" function in the gpiochip driver does not set flags, (like e.g.
> the Xilinx AXI GPIO driver: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/blob/c2ba891326bb472da59b6a2da29aca218d337687/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c#L262 )
> the random, unitialized value from the stack in of_find_gpio
> ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18.13/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L228 )
> is used, which results in random settings of e.g., OPEN DRAIN or OPEN SOURCE mode.
>
> I have also reported the problem in the Xilinx forum: https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Linux/Bug-in-of-get-named-gpiod-flags-function-in-the-kernel-random/td-p/897695
>
> With best regards,
> Wojciech Zabolotny
>
>
>
--
~Randy
Hi Wojciech,
(Thanks also Randy for forwarding this!)
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:32 PM wzab <[email protected]> wrote:
> The function of_get_named_gpiod_flags in older versions of the kernel
> (up to 4.7.10 - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.7.10/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L75 )
> contained an important workaround:
>
> /* .of_xlate might decide to not fill in the flags, so clear it. */if (flags)
> *flags = 0; Unfortunately, newer kernels do not contain it. Therefore if the
> "xlat" function in the gpiochip driver does not set flags, (like e.g.
> the Xilinx AXI GPIO driver: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/blob/c2ba891326bb472da59b6a2da29aca218d337687/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c#L262 )
> the random, unitialized value from the stack in of_find_gpio
> ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18.13/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L228 )
> is used, which results in random settings of e.g., OPEN DRAIN or OPEN SOURCE mode.
>
> I have also reported the problem in the Xilinx forum:
> https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Linux/Bug-in-of-get-named-gpiod-flags-function-in-the-kernel-random/td-p/897695
It seems the commit removing this is:
commit 762c2e46c0591d207289105c8718e4adf29b2b34
"gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data"
But I honestly don't see a problem with it.
You are referencing an out-of-tree driver. Use the in-tree gpio-xilinx.c
that does not do any custom xlate and you will be fine.
I looked over the driver doing custom flag translation in the kernel tree,
and they all set flags, so this is not a problem in the upstream kernel.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Hi,
On 11.10.2018 10:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Wojciech,
>
> (Thanks also Randy for forwarding this!)
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:32 PM wzab <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The function of_get_named_gpiod_flags in older versions of the kernel
>> (up to 4.7.10 - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.7.10/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L75 )
>> contained an important workaround:
>>
>> /* .of_xlate might decide to not fill in the flags, so clear it. */if (flags)
>> *flags = 0; Unfortunately, newer kernels do not contain it. Therefore if the
>> "xlat" function in the gpiochip driver does not set flags, (like e.g.
>> the Xilinx AXI GPIO driver: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/blob/c2ba891326bb472da59b6a2da29aca218d337687/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c#L262 )
>> the random, unitialized value from the stack in of_find_gpio
>> ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18.13/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L228 )
>> is used, which results in random settings of e.g., OPEN DRAIN or OPEN SOURCE mode.
>>
>> I have also reported the problem in the Xilinx forum:
>> https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Linux/Bug-in-of-get-named-gpiod-flags-function-in-the-kernel-random/td-p/897695
>
> It seems the commit removing this is:
>
> commit 762c2e46c0591d207289105c8718e4adf29b2b34
> "gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data"
>
> But I honestly don't see a problem with it.
>
> You are referencing an out-of-tree driver. Use the in-tree gpio-xilinx.c
> that does not do any custom xlate and you will be fine.
>
> I looked over the driver doing custom flag translation in the kernel tree,
> and they all set flags, so this is not a problem in the upstream kernel.
There was an attempt to sync up xilinx internal gpio driver with
mainline by someone else but not sure what's the status.
If you have issue with xilinx internal patch please talk to us.
If the problem is with mainline please use this mailing list.
Thanks,
Michal
On 10/12/18 10:54 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.10.2018 10:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Hi Wojciech,
>>
>> (Thanks also Randy for forwarding this!)
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:32 PM wzab <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The function of_get_named_gpiod_flags in older versions of the kernel
>>> (up to 4.7.10 - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.7.10/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L75 )
>>> contained an important workaround:
>>>
>>> /* .of_xlate might decide to not fill in the flags, so clear it. */if (flags)
>>> *flags = 0; Unfortunately, newer kernels do not contain it. Therefore if the
>>> "xlat" function in the gpiochip driver does not set flags, (like e.g.
>>> the Xilinx AXI GPIO driver: https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/blob/c2ba891326bb472da59b6a2da29aca218d337687/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c#L262 )
>>> the random, unitialized value from the stack in of_find_gpio
>>> ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18.13/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c#L228 )
>>> is used, which results in random settings of e.g., OPEN DRAIN or OPEN SOURCE mode.
>>>
>>> I have also reported the problem in the Xilinx forum:
>>> https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Embedded-Linux/Bug-in-of-get-named-gpiod-flags-function-in-the-kernel-random/td-p/897695
>> It seems the commit removing this is:
>>
>> commit 762c2e46c0591d207289105c8718e4adf29b2b34
>> "gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data"
>>
>> But I honestly don't see a problem with it.
>>
>> You are referencing an out-of-tree driver. Use the in-tree gpio-xilinx.c
>> that does not do any custom xlate and you will be fine.
>>
>> I looked over the driver doing custom flag translation in the kernel tree,
>> and they all set flags, so this is not a problem in the upstream kernel.
> There was an attempt to sync up xilinx internal gpio driver with
> mainline by someone else but not sure what's the status.
> If you have issue with xilinx internal patch please talk to us.
> If the problem is with mainline please use this mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
The question is, if there may be any other in-tree GPIO controller
driver that does not initialize those flags?
Anyway the current situation is somehow dangerous.
Maybe the best solution would be to initialize the automatic variable in
the of_find_gpio?
With best regards,
Wojtek
--
Wojciech M Zabolotny, PhD
Institute of Electronic Systems
Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology
Warsaw University of Technology
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The question is, if there may be any other in-tree GPIO controller
> driver that does not initialize those flags?
So as I said, I looked over them and they all initialize
their flags.
> Anyway the current situation is somehow dangerous.
Not very dangerous compared to much other kernel code.
> Maybe the best solution would be to initialize the automatic variable in
> the of_find_gpio?
Patches welcom, make sure they are tested with mainline
code and drivers.
Yours.
Linus Walleij
On 13.10.2018 18:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM [email protected]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The question is, if there may be any other in-tree GPIO controller
>> driver that does not initialize those flags?
> So as I said, I looked over them and they all initialize
> their flags.
>
>> Anyway the current situation is somehow dangerous.
> Not very dangerous compared to much other kernel code.
>
>> Maybe the best solution would be to initialize the automatic variable in
>> the of_find_gpio?
> Patches welcom, make sure they are tested with mainline
> code and drivers.
>
> Yours.
> Linus Walleij
OK. So I suggested correction of the Xilinx GPIO driver so that it always sets the flags:
static int xgpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags)
{
struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
struct xgpio_instance *chip = container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance,
mmchip);
if(flags)
* flags = 0;
if (gpiospec->args[1] == chip->offset)
return gpiospec->args[0];
return -EINVAL;
}
With best regards,
Wojtek