Add suffix LL and ULL to various constants in order to give the compiler
complete information about the proper arithmetic to use. Such constants
are used in contexts that expect expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned)
and s64 (64 bits, signed).
The mentioned expressions are currently being evaluated using 32-bit
arithmetic, wich in some cases can lead to unintentional integer
overflows.
This patchset addresses the following "Unintentional integer overflow"
Coverity reports:
CIDs: 200604, 1056807, 1056808, 1271223, 1324146
CIDs: 1392628, 1392630, 1446589, 1454996, 1458347
Thank you
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix ULL and LL to constants instead of casting variables.
- Extend the proposed code changes to other similar cases that had not
previously been considered in v1 of this patchset.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity report in all commit messages.
Gustavo A. R. Silva (8):
rtl2832: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit in
rtl2832_set_frontend
dvb-frontends: ves1820: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
i2c: max2175: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
i2c: ov9650: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
pci: cx88-input: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
rockchip/rga: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
platform: sh_veu: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
platform: vivid-cec: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2832.c | 4 ++--
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ves1820.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/i2c/max2175.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-input.c | 4 ++--
drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga-buf.c | 3 ++-
drivers/media/platform/sh_veu.c | 4 ++--
drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c | 11 +++++++++--
8 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
Add suffix ULL to constant 7 in order to give the compiler complete
information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice that this
constant is used in a context that expects an expression of type
u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
The expression dev->pdata->clk * 7 is currently being evaluated
using 32-bit arithmetic.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1271223 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix ULL to constant instead of casting a variable.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity report in the commit message.
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2832.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2832.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2832.c
index 94bf5b7..fa3b816 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2832.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/rtl2832.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int rtl2832_set_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
* RSAMP_RATIO = floor(CrystalFreqHz * 7 * pow(2, 22)
* / ConstWithBandwidthMode)
*/
- num = dev->pdata->clk * 7;
+ num = dev->pdata->clk * 7ULL;
num *= 0x400000;
num = div_u64(num, bw_mode);
resamp_ratio = num & 0x3ffffff;
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int rtl2832_set_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
* / (CrystalFreqHz * 7))
*/
num = bw_mode << 20;
- num2 = dev->pdata->clk * 7;
+ num2 = dev->pdata->clk * 7ULL;
num = div_u64(num, num2);
num = -num;
cfreq_off_ratio = num & 0xfffff;
--
2.7.4
Add suffix ULL to constant 10 in order to give the compiler complete
information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice that this
constant is used in a context that expects an expression of type
u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
The expression fpxin = state->config->xin * 10 is currently being
evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 200604 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix ULL to constant instead of casting a variable.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity report in the commit message.
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ves1820.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ves1820.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ves1820.c
index 1d89792..1760098 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ves1820.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ves1820.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int ves1820_set_symbolrate(struct ves1820_state *state, u32 symbolrate)
NDEC = 3;
/* yeuch! */
- fpxin = state->config->xin * 10;
+ fpxin = state->config->xin * 10ULL;
fptmp = fpxin; do_div(fptmp, 123);
if (symbolrate < fptmp)
SFIL = 1;
--
2.7.4
Add suffix LL to constant 2 in order to give the compiler complete
information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice that this
constant is used in a context that expects an expression of type
s64 (64 bits, signed).
The expression 2 * (clock_rate - abs_nco_freq) is currently being
evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1446589 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix LL to constant instead of casting a variable.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity report in the commit message.
drivers/media/i2c/max2175.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max2175.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max2175.c
index 2f1966b..87cba15 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/max2175.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max2175.c
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static int max2175_set_nco_freq(struct max2175 *ctx, s32 nco_freq)
if (abs_nco_freq < clock_rate / 2) {
nco_val_desired = 2 * nco_freq;
} else {
- nco_val_desired = 2 * (clock_rate - abs_nco_freq);
+ nco_val_desired = 2LL * (clock_rate - abs_nco_freq);
if (nco_freq < 0)
nco_val_desired = -nco_val_desired;
}
--
2.7.4
Add suffix ULL to constants 10000 and 1000000 in order to give the
compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
The following expressions:
(u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000)
(u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000)
fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator
are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
Notice that those casts to u64 for the first two expressions are only
effective after such expressions are evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
which leads to potential integer overflows. So based on those casts, it
seems that the original intention of the code is to actually use 64-bit
arithmetic instead of 32-bit.
Also, notice that once the suffix ULL is added to the constants, the
outer casts to u64 are no longer needed.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324146 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 84a15ded76ec ("[media] V4L: Add driver for OV9650/52 image sensors")
Fixes: 79211c8ed19c ("remove abs64()")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix ULL to constants instead of casting variables.
- Remove unnecessary casts to u64 as part of the code change.
- Extend the same code change to other similar expressions.
Changes in v3:
- None.
drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
index e519f27..e716e98 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
if (fi->interval.denominator == 0)
return -EINVAL;
- req_int = (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000) /
+ req_int = fi->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
fi->interval.denominator;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ov965x_intervals); i++) {
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
if (mbus_fmt->width != iv->size.width ||
mbus_fmt->height != iv->size.height)
continue;
- err = abs((u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000) /
+ err = abs(iv->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
iv->interval.denominator - req_int);
if (err < min_err) {
fiv = iv;
@@ -1148,8 +1148,9 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
}
ov965x->fiv = fiv;
- v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %u us\n",
- fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator);
+ v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %llu us\n",
+ fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000ULL /
+ fiv->interval.denominator);
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
Add suffix LL to constant 1000000 in order to give the compiler
complete information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice
that this constant is used in a context that expects an expression
of type ktime_t (64 bits, signed).
The expression ir->polling * 1000000 is currently being evaluated
using 32-bit arithmetic.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1392628 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1392630 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix LL to constant instead of casting a variable.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity reports in the commit message.
drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-input.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-input.c b/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-input.c
index 4e9953e..6f4e692 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-input.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-input.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart cx88_ir_work(struct hrtimer *timer)
struct cx88_IR *ir = container_of(timer, struct cx88_IR, timer);
cx88_ir_handle_key(ir);
- missed = hrtimer_forward_now(&ir->timer, ir->polling * 1000000);
+ missed = hrtimer_forward_now(&ir->timer, ir->polling * 1000000LL);
if (missed > 1)
ir_dprintk("Missed ticks %ld\n", missed - 1);
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int __cx88_ir_start(void *priv)
if (ir->polling) {
hrtimer_init(&ir->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
ir->timer.function = cx88_ir_work;
- hrtimer_start(&ir->timer, ir->polling * 1000000,
+ hrtimer_start(&ir->timer, ir->polling * 1000000LL,
HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
}
if (ir->sampling) {
--
2.7.4
Cast p to dma_addr_t in order to avoid a potential integer overflow.
This variable is being used in a context that expects an expression
of type dma_addr_t (u64).
The expression p << PAGE_SHIFT is currently being evaluated
using 32-bit arithmetic.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458347 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code change.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity report in the commit message.
drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga-buf.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga-buf.c b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga-buf.c
index 49cacc7..a43b57a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga-buf.c
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ void rga_buf_map(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
address = sg_phys(sgl);
for (p = 0; p < len; p++) {
- dma_addr_t phys = address + (p << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ dma_addr_t phys = address +
+ ((dma_addr_t)p << PAGE_SHIFT);
pages[mapped_size + p] = phys;
}
--
2.7.4
Cast left and top to dma_addr_t in order to give the compiler complete
information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice that these
variables are being used in contexts that expect expressions of
type dma_addr_t (64 bit, unsigned).
Such expressions are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
Also, move the expression (((dma_addr_t)left * veu->vfmt_out.fmt->depth) >> 3)
at the end in order to avoid a line wrapping checkpatch.pl warning.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056807 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056808 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Move the expression (((dma_addr_t)left * veu->vfmt_out.fmt->depth) >> 3)
at the end in order to avoid a line wrapping checkpatch.pl warning.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity reports in the commit message.
drivers/media/platform/sh_veu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sh_veu.c b/drivers/media/platform/sh_veu.c
index 976ea0b..1a0cde0 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/sh_veu.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/sh_veu.c
@@ -520,8 +520,8 @@ static void sh_veu_colour_offset(struct sh_veu_dev *veu, struct sh_veu_vfmt *vfm
/* dst_left and dst_top validity will be verified in CROP / COMPOSE */
unsigned int left = vfmt->frame.left & ~0x03;
unsigned int top = vfmt->frame.top;
- dma_addr_t offset = ((left * veu->vfmt_out.fmt->depth) >> 3) +
- top * veu->vfmt_out.bytesperline;
+ dma_addr_t offset = (dma_addr_t)top * veu->vfmt_out.bytesperline +
+ (((dma_addr_t)left * veu->vfmt_out.fmt->depth) >> 3);
unsigned int y_line;
vfmt->offset_y = offset;
--
2.7.4
Add suffix ULL to constant 10 in order to give the compiler complete
information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice that this
constant is used in a context that expects an expression of type
u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
The expression len * 10 * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL is currently being
evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
Also, remove unnecessary parentheses and add a code comment to make it
clear what is the reason of the code change.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1454996 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
- Add suffix ULL to constant instead of casting a variable.
- Remove unnecessary parentheses.
- Add code comment.
Changes in v3:
- Mention the specific Coverity report in the commit message.
drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c
index b55d278..614787b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c
@@ -82,8 +82,15 @@ static void vivid_cec_pin_adap_events(struct cec_adapter *adap, ktime_t ts,
if (adap == NULL)
return;
- ts = ktime_sub_us(ts, (CEC_TIM_START_BIT_TOTAL +
- len * 10 * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL));
+
+ /*
+ * Suffix ULL on constant 10 makes the expression
+ * CEC_TIM_START_BIT_TOTAL + 10ULL * len * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL
+ * to be evaluated using 64-bit unsigned arithmetic (u64), which
+ * is what ktime_sub_us expects as second argument.
+ */
+ ts = ktime_sub_us(ts, CEC_TIM_START_BIT_TOTAL +
+ 10ULL * len * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL);
cec_queue_pin_cec_event(adap, false, ts);
ts = ktime_add_us(ts, CEC_TIM_START_BIT_LOW);
cec_queue_pin_cec_event(adap, true, ts);
--
2.7.4
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Add suffix ULL to constants 10000 and 1000000 in order to give the
> compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
> Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
> expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
>
> The following expressions:
>
> (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000)
> (u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000)
> fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator
>
> are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
>
> Notice that those casts to u64 for the first two expressions are only
> effective after such expressions are evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
> which leads to potential integer overflows. So based on those casts, it
> seems that the original intention of the code is to actually use 64-bit
> arithmetic instead of 32-bit.
>
> Also, notice that once the suffix ULL is added to the constants, the
> outer casts to u64 are no longer needed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324146 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: 84a15ded76ec ("[media] V4L: Add driver for OV9650/52 image sensors")
> Fixes: 79211c8ed19c ("remove abs64()")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
> - Add suffix ULL to constants instead of casting variables.
> - Remove unnecessary casts to u64 as part of the code change.
> - Extend the same code change to other similar expressions.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - None.
>
> drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
> index e519f27..e716e98 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
> @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
> if (fi->interval.denominator == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - req_int = (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000) /
> + req_int = fi->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
> fi->interval.denominator;
This has been addressed by your earlier patch "i2c: ov9650: fix potential integer overflow in
__ov965x_set_frame_interval" I tweaked a little. It's not in media tree
master yet.
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ov965x_intervals); i++) {
> @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
> if (mbus_fmt->width != iv->size.width ||
> mbus_fmt->height != iv->size.height)
> continue;
> - err = abs((u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000) /
> + err = abs(iv->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
This and the chunk below won't work on e.g. 32-bit ARM. do_div(), please.
> iv->interval.denominator - req_int);
> if (err < min_err) {
> fiv = iv;
> @@ -1148,8 +1148,9 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
> }
> ov965x->fiv = fiv;
>
> - v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %u us\n",
> - fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator);
> + v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %llu us\n",
> + fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000ULL /
> + fiv->interval.denominator);
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: [email protected]
Hi Sakari,
On 02/07/2018 03:59 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Add suffix ULL to constants 10000 and 1000000 in order to give the
>> compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
>> Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
>> expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
>>
>> The following expressions:
>>
>> (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000)
>> (u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000)
>> fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator
>>
>> are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
>>
>> Notice that those casts to u64 for the first two expressions are only
>> effective after such expressions are evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
>> which leads to potential integer overflows. So based on those casts, it
>> seems that the original intention of the code is to actually use 64-bit
>> arithmetic instead of 32-bit.
>>
>> Also, notice that once the suffix ULL is added to the constants, the
>> outer casts to u64 are no longer needed.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324146 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
>> Fixes: 84a15ded76ec ("[media] V4L: Add driver for OV9650/52 image sensors")
>> Fixes: 79211c8ed19c ("remove abs64()")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
>> - Add suffix ULL to constants instead of casting variables.
>> - Remove unnecessary casts to u64 as part of the code change.
>> - Extend the same code change to other similar expressions.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - None.
>>
>> drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>> index e519f27..e716e98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>> @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>> if (fi->interval.denominator == 0)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - req_int = (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000) /
>> + req_int = fi->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
>> fi->interval.denominator;
>
> This has been addressed by your earlier patch "i2c: ov9650: fix potential integer overflow in
> __ov965x_set_frame_interval" I tweaked a little. It's not in media tree
> master yet.
>
Yeah. Actually this patch is supposed to be an improved version of the
one you mention. That is why this is version 3.
Also, I wonder if the same issue you mention below regarding 32-bit ARM
applies in this case too?
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ov965x_intervals); i++) {
>> @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>> if (mbus_fmt->width != iv->size.width ||
>> mbus_fmt->height != iv->size.height)
>> continue;
>> - err = abs((u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000) /
>> + err = abs(iv->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
>
> This and the chunk below won't work on e.g. 32-bit ARM. do_div(), please.
>
Thanks for pointing this out.
>> iv->interval.denominator - req_int);
>> if (err < min_err) {
>> fiv = iv;
>> @@ -1148,8 +1148,9 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>> }
>> ov965x->fiv = fiv;
>>
>> - v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %u us\n",
>> - fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator);
>> + v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %llu us\n",
>> + fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000ULL /
>> + fiv->interval.denominator);
I wonder if do_div should be used for the code above?
I appreciate your feedback.
Thank you!
--
Gustavo
On 08/02/18 17:39, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On 02/07/2018 03:59 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Add suffix ULL to constants 10000 and 1000000 in order to give the
>>> compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
>>> Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
>>> expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
>>>
>>> The following expressions:
>>>
>>> (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000)
>>> (u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000)
>>> fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator
>>>
>>> are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
>>>
>>> Notice that those casts to u64 for the first two expressions are only
>>> effective after such expressions are evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
>>> which leads to potential integer overflows. So based on those casts, it
>>> seems that the original intention of the code is to actually use 64-bit
>>> arithmetic instead of 32-bit.
>>>
>>> Also, notice that once the suffix ULL is added to the constants, the
>>> outer casts to u64 are no longer needed.
>>>
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324146 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
>>> Fixes: 84a15ded76ec ("[media] V4L: Add driver for OV9650/52 image sensors")
>>> Fixes: 79211c8ed19c ("remove abs64()")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
>>> - Add suffix ULL to constants instead of casting variables.
>>> - Remove unnecessary casts to u64 as part of the code change.
>>> - Extend the same code change to other similar expressions.
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - None.
>>>
>>> drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 9 +++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>>> index e519f27..e716e98 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>>> @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>>> if (fi->interval.denominator == 0)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> - req_int = (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000) /
>>> + req_int = fi->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
>>> fi->interval.denominator;
>>
>> This has been addressed by your earlier patch "i2c: ov9650: fix potential integer overflow in
>> __ov965x_set_frame_interval" I tweaked a little. It's not in media tree
>> master yet.
>>
>
> Yeah. Actually this patch is supposed to be an improved version of the one you mention. That is why this is version 3.
>
> Also, I wonder if the same issue you mention below regarding 32-bit ARM applies in this case too?
>
>>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ov965x_intervals); i++) {
>>> @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>>> if (mbus_fmt->width != iv->size.width ||
>>> mbus_fmt->height != iv->size.height)
>>> continue;
>>> - err = abs((u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000) /
>>> + err = abs(iv->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
>>
>> This and the chunk below won't work on e.g. 32-bit ARM. do_div(), please.
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>>> iv->interval.denominator - req_int);
>>> if (err < min_err) {
>>> fiv = iv;
>>> @@ -1148,8 +1148,9 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>>> }
>>> ov965x->fiv = fiv;
>>> - v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %u us\n",
>>> - fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator);
>>> + v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %llu us\n",
>>> + fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000ULL /
>>> + fiv->interval.denominator);
>
> I wonder if do_div should be used for the code above?
Yes, do_div should be used.
Hans
>
> I appreciate your feedback.
>
> Thank you!
On 02/15/2018 07:52 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/02/18 17:39, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> On 02/07/2018 03:59 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Hi Gustavo,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>> Add suffix ULL to constants 10000 and 1000000 in order to give the
>>>> compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use.
>>>> Notice that these constants are used in contexts that expect
>>>> expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned).
>>>>
>>>> The following expressions:
>>>>
>>>> (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000)
>>>> (u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000)
>>>> fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator
>>>>
>>>> are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic.
>>>>
>>>> Notice that those casts to u64 for the first two expressions are only
>>>> effective after such expressions are evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
>>>> which leads to potential integer overflows. So based on those casts, it
>>>> seems that the original intention of the code is to actually use 64-bit
>>>> arithmetic instead of 32-bit.
>>>>
>>>> Also, notice that once the suffix ULL is added to the constants, the
>>>> outer casts to u64 are no longer needed.
>>>>
>>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324146 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
>>>> Fixes: 84a15ded76ec ("[media] V4L: Add driver for OV9650/52 image sensors")
>>>> Fixes: 79211c8ed19c ("remove abs64()")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code changes.
>>>> - Add suffix ULL to constants instead of casting variables.
>>>> - Remove unnecessary casts to u64 as part of the code change.
>>>> - Extend the same code change to other similar expressions.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - None.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c | 9 +++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>>>> index e519f27..e716e98 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov9650.c
>>>> @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>>>> if (fi->interval.denominator == 0)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> - req_int = (u64)(fi->interval.numerator * 10000) /
>>>> + req_int = fi->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
>>>> fi->interval.denominator;
>>>
>>> This has been addressed by your earlier patch "i2c: ov9650: fix potential integer overflow in
>>> __ov965x_set_frame_interval" I tweaked a little. It's not in media tree
>>> master yet.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. Actually this patch is supposed to be an improved version of the one you mention. That is why this is version 3.
>>
>> Also, I wonder if the same issue you mention below regarding 32-bit ARM applies in this case too?
>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ov965x_intervals); i++) {
>>>> @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>>>> if (mbus_fmt->width != iv->size.width ||
>>>> mbus_fmt->height != iv->size.height)
>>>> continue;
>>>> - err = abs((u64)(iv->interval.numerator * 10000) /
>>>> + err = abs(iv->interval.numerator * 10000ULL /
>>>
>>> This and the chunk below won't work on e.g. 32-bit ARM. do_div(), please.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out.
>>
>>>> iv->interval.denominator - req_int);
>>>> if (err < min_err) {
>>>> fiv = iv;
>>>> @@ -1148,8 +1148,9 @@ static int __ov965x_set_frame_interval(struct ov965x *ov965x,
>>>> }
>>>> ov965x->fiv = fiv;
>>>> - v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %u us\n",
>>>> - fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000 / fiv->interval.denominator);
>>>> + v4l2_dbg(1, debug, &ov965x->sd, "Changed frame interval to %llu us\n",
>>>> + fiv->interval.numerator * 1000000ULL /
>>>> + fiv->interval.denominator);
>>
>> I wonder if do_div should be used for the code above?
>
> Yes, do_div should be used.
>
I got it.
Thanks, Hans.
--
Gustavo