2007-08-13 07:35:56

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L: [email protected]
W: http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
S: Supported
+F: fs/cifs/

CONFIGFS
P: Joel Becker


2007-08-13 14:24:24

by Andrew Bartlett

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:25 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L: [email protected]
> W: http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
> T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
> S: Supported
> +F: fs/cifs/

No comment on the F:, but the L: entry here is interesting. Is
samba-technical really the right list for cifs-vfs patches? Aside from
being CC'ed on such patches, I've never seen discussion of them on the
Samba mailing lists.

Steve: Shouldn't that be linux-cifs-client?

Andrew Bartlett

--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com

Attachments:
signature.asc (189.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2007-08-13 16:22:23

by Steve French

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

Yes - I will fix this up.

On 8/13/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L: [email protected]
> W: http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
> T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
> S: Supported
> +F: fs/cifs/
>
> CONFIGFS
> P: Joel Becker
>


--
Thanks,

Steve

2007-08-13 20:37:50

by Steve French

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM (CIFS)

On 8/13/07, Andrew Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:25 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L: [email protected]
> > W: http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
> > T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
> > S: Supported
> > +F: fs/cifs/
>
> No comment on the F:, but the L: entry here is interesting. Is
> samba-technical really the right list for cifs-vfs patches? Aside from
> being CC'ed on such patches, I've never seen discussion of them on the
> Samba mailing lists.
>
> Steve: Shouldn't that be linux-cifs-client?

linux-cifs-client is mentioned on the L: entry immediately before the
samba-technical one so no change seems to be needed for that.

I updated the W: line to point to the preferred URL
(http://linux-cifs.samba.org)

Adding an F: entry in the future is fine by me

--
Thanks,

Steve