First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
#define HWBASE_AD (448000)
...
with if(bta->analog) evaluating to true bta->decimation may range
from 15 to 5
...
HWBASE_AD*4/bta->decimation>>bta->sampleshift
which is equivalent to
((HWBASE_AD * 4)/bta->decimation) >> bta->sampleshift
actually may evaluate to something like:
(1792000 / 15 ) >> bta->sampleshift
Isn't intended (HWBASE_AD * 4)/(bta->decimation >> bta->sampleshift)?
Then consider the patch below.
--
Fix operator precedence in return
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/sound/oss/btaudio.c b/sound/oss/btaudio.c
index 4d5cf05..2a5cace 100644
--- a/sound/oss/btaudio.c
+++ b/sound/oss/btaudio.c
@@ -661,7 +661,8 @@ static int btaudio_dsp_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
/* fall through */
case SOUND_PCM_READ_RATE:
if (bta->analog) {
- return put_user(HWBASE_AD*4/bta->decimation>>bta->sampleshift, p);
+ return put_user((HWBASE_AD * 4) /
+ (bta->decimation >> bta->sampleshift), p);
} else {
return put_user(bta->rate, p);
}
Roel Kluin wrote:
> First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
>
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE
When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25
Why: obsolete OSS drivers
Who: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
tom
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Roel Kluin wrote:
> > First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
> >
>
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>
> What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE
> When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25
> Why: obsolete OSS drivers
> Who: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
I'm maintaining only the gradual removal. ;-)
That's only the removal of some of the remaining OSS drivers, but
btaudio is among them.
> tom
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed