Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files
in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was built with
allmodconfig for both powerpc and x86_64.
There only one merge problem and no build failures!
We are up to 30 trees, more are welcome (even if they are currently
empty). I would encourage architecture maintainers, in particular, to
set up a git branch or quilt tree now to avoid the rush after RC3 :-)
I am now including tarballs in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/.
Status of my local build tests is at
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. The sparc builds have
been mostly disabled while I obtain a working cross compiler.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Stephen Rothwell schrieb:
> I am now including tarballs in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/.
Looks great :-) Of course i also just put a ref to it on the
wiki.
Thanks,
Frank
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell schrieb:
> I am now including tarballs in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/.
at least the bz2 tar i just looked at from that URL has a problem
with the prefix resulting to this toplevel extraction:
next-20080222arch
next-20080222block
...
next-20080222virt
So, i guess you just missed the trailing slash for the prefix
parameter of git archive?
(should be --prefix=next-20080222/ afaik)
Thanks,
Frank
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:32:58 +0100 Frank Seidel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Looks great :-) Of course i also just put a ref to it on the
> wiki.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:43:58 +0100 Frank Seidel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> at least the bz2 tar i just looked at from that URL has a problem
> with the prefix resulting to this toplevel extraction:
>
> next-20080222arch
> next-20080222block
> ...
> next-20080222virt
>
> So, i guess you just missed the trailing slash for the prefix
> parameter of git archive?
> (should be --prefix=next-20080222/ afaik)
Indeed. Thanks. I am regenerating them now.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Status of my local build tests is at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. The sparc builds have
> been mostly disabled while I obtain a working cross compiler.
I have reenabled the sparc and sparc64 builds but there is a bug in 32bit
sparc (in Linus' tree) at the moment.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:21:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Status of my local build tests is at
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. The sparc builds have
> > been mostly disabled while I obtain a working cross compiler.
>
> I have reenabled the sparc and sparc64 builds but there is a bug in 32bit
> sparc (in Linus' tree) at the moment.
Remove includes of linux/rcupdate.h and linux/mm.h from memcontrol.h;
patch had been posted some time ago.
From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:25:54 +0000
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:21:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Status of my local build tests is at
> > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. The sparc builds have
> > > been mostly disabled while I obtain a working cross compiler.
> >
> > I have reenabled the sparc and sparc64 builds but there is a bug in 32bit
> > sparc (in Linus' tree) at the moment.
>
> Remove includes of linux/rcupdate.h and linux/mm.h from memcontrol.h;
> patch had been posted some time ago.
Yes, it's clogged up in Andrew's patch queue somewhere.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
>
> I am now including tarballs in
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/.
Thanks for that.
---
~Randy
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:30:15 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:25:54 +0000
>
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:21:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:04:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Status of my local build tests is at
> > > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/. The sparc builds have
> > > > been mostly disabled while I obtain a working cross compiler.
> > >
> > > I have reenabled the sparc and sparc64 builds but there is a bug in 32bit
> > > sparc (in Linus' tree) at the moment.
> >
> > Remove includes of linux/rcupdate.h and linux/mm.h from memcontrol.h;
> > patch had been posted some time ago.
>
> Yes, it's clogged up in Andrew's patch queue somewhere.
Yeah, sorry, Andrew's clogged up in airplanes. I should get it out over
the weekend.