2021-12-02 23:10:33

by Maciej S. Szmigiero

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: selftests: svm_int_ctl_test: fix intercept calculation

From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <[email protected]>

INTERCEPT_x are bit positions, but the code was using the raw value of
INTERCEPT_VINTR (4) instead of BIT(INTERCEPT_VINTR).
This resulted in masking of bit 2 - that is, SMI instead of VINTR.

Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
index df04f56ce859..30a81038df46 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_INTR_MASKING_MASK;

/* No intercepts for real and virtual interrupts */
- vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(1ULL << INTERCEPT_INTR | INTERCEPT_VINTR);
+ vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(BIT(INTERCEPT_INTR) | BIT(INTERCEPT_VINTR));

/* Make a virtual interrupt VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER pending */
vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_IRQ_MASK | (0x1 << V_INTR_PRIO_SHIFT);


2021-12-03 07:36:23

by Maxim Levitsky

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: selftests: svm_int_ctl_test: fix intercept calculation

On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 00:10 +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <[email protected]>
>
> INTERCEPT_x are bit positions, but the code was using the raw value of
> INTERCEPT_VINTR (4) instead of BIT(INTERCEPT_VINTR).
> This resulted in masking of bit 2 - that is, SMI instead of VINTR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
> index df04f56ce859..30a81038df46 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
> vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_INTR_MASKING_MASK;
>
> /* No intercepts for real and virtual interrupts */
> - vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(1ULL << INTERCEPT_INTR | INTERCEPT_VINTR);
> + vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(BIT(INTERCEPT_INTR) | BIT(INTERCEPT_VINTR));
>
> /* Make a virtual interrupt VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER pending */
> vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_IRQ_MASK | (0x1 << V_INTR_PRIO_SHIFT);
>
Sorry about that.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky


2021-12-08 14:04:27

by Paolo Bonzini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: selftests: svm_int_ctl_test: fix intercept calculation

On 12/3/21 00:10, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <[email protected]>
>
> INTERCEPT_x are bit positions, but the code was using the raw value of
> INTERCEPT_VINTR (4) instead of BIT(INTERCEPT_VINTR).
> This resulted in masking of bit 2 - that is, SMI instead of VINTR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
> index df04f56ce859..30a81038df46 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
> vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_INTR_MASKING_MASK;
>
> /* No intercepts for real and virtual interrupts */
> - vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(1ULL << INTERCEPT_INTR | INTERCEPT_VINTR);
> + vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(BIT(INTERCEPT_INTR) | BIT(INTERCEPT_VINTR));
>
> /* Make a virtual interrupt VINTR_IRQ_NUMBER pending */
> vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_IRQ_MASK | (0x1 << V_INTR_PRIO_SHIFT);
>

Queued, thanks.

Paolo