On 06/07/2010 11:59 PM, Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
> From: Rakesh Ranjan<[email protected]>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Ranjan<[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i.h | 175 +++++
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i_ddp.c | 653 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i_init.c | 317 ++++++++
> drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i_offload.c | 1409 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 2554 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i_ddp.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i_init.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i_offload.c
>
Do you think you can look through this patch and identify the places
where you basically just copied a cxgb3i function or copied it but
renamed some stuff and then move these type of things to the lib patch?
A lot of the scatter list stuff for example looks the same in each driver.
ddp_find_unused_entries - cxgb4i_ddp_find_unused_entries
ddp_unmark_entries - cxgb4i_ddp_unmark_entries
cxgb3i_ddp_find_page_index - cxgb4i_ddp_find_page_index
cxgb3i_ddp_adjust_page_table - cxgb4i_ddp_adjust_page_table
..... (lots of the ddp code looks duplicated).
The *_offload.c code looks the same.