=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.36-rc1 #1
---------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
ip6tables-resto/3098 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&(&lock->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<c152ae2c>] get_counters+0xcc/0x160
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[<c108df53>] __lock_acquire+0x9b3/0x1850
[<c108ee54>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x80
[<c159817d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3d/0x50
[<c152b99f>] ip6t_do_table+0x5f/0x440
[<c152c932>] ip6table_filter_hook+0x22/0x30
[<c148e5f1>] nf_iterate+0x71/0x90
[<c148e90f>] nf_hook_slow+0xcf/0x120
[<c151c996>] mld_sendpack+0x276/0x4d0
[<c151d338>] mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x258/0x2f0
[<c106bd70>] run_timer_softirq+0x130/0x280
[<c10668b1>] __do_softirq+0x91/0x130
[<c10669ad>] do_softirq+0x5d/0x70
[<c1066bd5>] irq_exit+0x75/0x80
[<c1042166>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x56/0x90
[<c159927f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2f/0x34
[<c159817d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3d/0x50
[<c10fa92a>] __d_lookup+0xca/0x160
[<c10f095d>] do_lookup+0x3d/0x1c0
[<c10f2706>] link_path_walk+0x3a6/0xa40
[<c10f2ea4>] path_walk+0x44/0xa0
[<c10f2fd1>] do_path_lookup+0x51/0x60
[<c10f3acc>] user_path_at+0x3c/0x80
[<c10e6e0a>] sys_faccessat+0x9a/0x180
[<c10e6f10>] sys_access+0x20/0x30
[<c1598e25>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
irq event stamp: 5463
hardirqs last enabled at (5463): [<c1066d22>] local_bh_enable+0x62/0xe0
hardirqs last disabled at (5461): [<c1066ce4>] local_bh_enable+0x24/0xe0
softirqs last enabled at (5462): [<c152addd>] get_counters+0x7d/0x160
softirqs last disabled at (5460): [<c152ad86>] get_counters+0x26/0x160
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by ip6tables-resto/3098:
#0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.+.}, at: [<c150ea18>] ipv6_getsockopt+0x98/0xe0
#1: (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c149f8fc>] xt_find_table_lock+0x2c/0xe0
stack backtrace:
Pid: 3098, comm: ip6tables-resto Not tainted 2.6.36-rc1 #1
Call Trace:
[<c1594e46>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
[<c108be3c>] print_usage_bug+0x15c/0x1a0
[<c108c225>] mark_lock+0x3a5/0x5b0
[<c108cbb0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xe0
[<c108df94>] __lock_acquire+0x9f4/0x1850
[<c11df263>] ? rb_insert_color+0xd3/0x110
[<c10e1fdf>] ? __kmalloc+0x6f/0xf0
[<c108ee54>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x80
[<c152ae2c>] ? get_counters+0xcc/0x160
[<c159817d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3d/0x50
[<c152ae2c>] ? get_counters+0xcc/0x160
[<c152ae2c>] get_counters+0xcc/0x160
[<c152c37d>] do_ip6t_get_ctl+0x1ad/0x2d0
[<c159691a>] ? mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x23a/0x3c0
[<c148fd35>] nf_sockopt+0x105/0x180
[<c1066d0a>] ? local_bh_enable+0x4a/0xe0
[<c148fdd4>] nf_getsockopt+0x24/0x30
[<c150ea33>] ipv6_getsockopt+0xb3/0xe0
[<c1516bab>] rawv6_getsockopt+0x3b/0x170
[<c10c8efa>] ? might_fault+0x5a/0xb0
[<c1468692>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x22/0x30
[<c1466bcc>] sys_getsockopt+0x4c/0xa0
[<c14680bc>] sys_socketcall+0xfc/0x270
[<c1029010>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
Full log attached.
Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 19:12 +0200, Ortwin Glück a écrit :
> =================================
> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> 2.6.36-rc1 #1
> ---------------------------------
> inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
> ip6tables-resto/3098 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> (&(&lock->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<c152ae2c>] get_counters+0xcc/0x160
> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
> [<c108df53>] __lock_acquire+0x9b3/0x1850
> [<c108ee54>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x80
> [<c159817d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3d/0x50
> [<c152b99f>] ip6t_do_table+0x5f/0x440
> [<c152c932>] ip6table_filter_hook+0x22/0x30
> [<c148e5f1>] nf_iterate+0x71/0x90
> [<c148e90f>] nf_hook_slow+0xcf/0x120
> [<c151c996>] mld_sendpack+0x276/0x4d0
> [<c151d338>] mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x258/0x2f0
> [<c106bd70>] run_timer_softirq+0x130/0x280
> [<c10668b1>] __do_softirq+0x91/0x130
> [<c10669ad>] do_softirq+0x5d/0x70
> [<c1066bd5>] irq_exit+0x75/0x80
> [<c1042166>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x56/0x90
> [<c159927f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2f/0x34
> [<c159817d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3d/0x50
> [<c10fa92a>] __d_lookup+0xca/0x160
> [<c10f095d>] do_lookup+0x3d/0x1c0
> [<c10f2706>] link_path_walk+0x3a6/0xa40
> [<c10f2ea4>] path_walk+0x44/0xa0
> [<c10f2fd1>] do_path_lookup+0x51/0x60
> [<c10f3acc>] user_path_at+0x3c/0x80
> [<c10e6e0a>] sys_faccessat+0x9a/0x180
> [<c10e6f10>] sys_access+0x20/0x30
> [<c1598e25>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> irq event stamp: 5463
> hardirqs last enabled at (5463): [<c1066d22>] local_bh_enable+0x62/0xe0
> hardirqs last disabled at (5461): [<c1066ce4>] local_bh_enable+0x24/0xe0
> softirqs last enabled at (5462): [<c152addd>] get_counters+0x7d/0x160
> softirqs last disabled at (5460): [<c152ad86>] get_counters+0x26/0x160
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 2 locks held by ip6tables-resto/3098:
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.+.}, at: [<c150ea18>] ipv6_getsockopt+0x98/0xe0
> #1: (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c149f8fc>] xt_find_table_lock+0x2c/0xe0
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 3098, comm: ip6tables-resto Not tainted 2.6.36-rc1 #1
> Call Trace:
> [<c1594e46>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
> [<c108be3c>] print_usage_bug+0x15c/0x1a0
> [<c108c225>] mark_lock+0x3a5/0x5b0
> [<c108cbb0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xe0
> [<c108df94>] __lock_acquire+0x9f4/0x1850
> [<c11df263>] ? rb_insert_color+0xd3/0x110
> [<c10e1fdf>] ? __kmalloc+0x6f/0xf0
> [<c108ee54>] lock_acquire+0x64/0x80
> [<c152ae2c>] ? get_counters+0xcc/0x160
> [<c159817d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3d/0x50
> [<c152ae2c>] ? get_counters+0xcc/0x160
> [<c152ae2c>] get_counters+0xcc/0x160
> [<c152c37d>] do_ip6t_get_ctl+0x1ad/0x2d0
> [<c159691a>] ? mutex_lock_interruptible_nested+0x23a/0x3c0
> [<c148fd35>] nf_sockopt+0x105/0x180
> [<c1066d0a>] ? local_bh_enable+0x4a/0xe0
> [<c148fdd4>] nf_getsockopt+0x24/0x30
> [<c150ea33>] ipv6_getsockopt+0xb3/0xe0
> [<c1516bab>] rawv6_getsockopt+0x3b/0x170
> [<c10c8efa>] ? might_fault+0x5a/0xb0
> [<c1468692>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x22/0x30
> [<c1466bcc>] sys_getsockopt+0x4c/0xa0
> [<c14680bc>] sys_socketcall+0xfc/0x270
> [<c1029010>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
>
>
> Full log attached.
Yes, this is the fourth time it is reported here ;)
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128199018321130&w=2
Thanks