2010-11-25 04:20:54

by Kukjin Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes for 2.6.37-rc4

Hi Linus,

Please pull Samsung fixes from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
s5p-fixes-for-linus

These things are for small fix on 2.6.37-rc4.
If any problems, please let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

The following changes since commit 3561d43fd289f590fdae672e5eb831b8d5cf0bf6:

Linux 2.6.37-rc3 (2010-11-21 15:18:56 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
s5p-fixes-for-linus

Abhilash Kesavan (3):
ARM: S3C24XX: Fix Demux error in UART3 irqs on S3C2443 and S3C2416
ARM: S3C24XX: Fix UART3 submask on S3C2416 and S3C2443
ARM: S5PV210: Fix sysdev related warning messages

Darius Augulis (1):
ARM: S3C64XX: fix uart clock setup for mini6410/real6410

Kukjin Kim (1):
ARM: S3C24XX: Fix wrong s3c_gpio_cfgpull

Vasily Khoruzhick (1):
ARM: S3C2410: Adapt h1940-bluetooth to gpiolib changes

arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/h1940-bluetooth.c | 8 ++++----
arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/irq.c | 5 ++---
arch/arm/mach-s3c2443/irq.c | 5 ++---
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkc110.c | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 1 +
arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/spi-bus0-gpe11_12_13.c | 6 +++---
arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/spi-bus1-gpd8_9_10.c | 6 +++---
arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/spi-bus1-gpg5_6_7.c | 6 +++---
10 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


2010-11-26 18:26:55

by Darius Augulis

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes for 2.6.37-rc4

Hi Kukjin,

you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" again.
Please, don't forget to add it to your tree, better do it right now.
Perhaps it's fifth or sixth time when remind about that...

thanks,
Darius


On 11/25/2010 06:21 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please pull Samsung fixes from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> s5p-fixes-for-linus
>
> These things are for small fix on 2.6.37-rc4.
> If any problems, please let me know.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim<[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
> The following changes since commit 3561d43fd289f590fdae672e5eb831b8d5cf0bf6:
>
> Linux 2.6.37-rc3 (2010-11-21 15:18:56 -0800)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> s5p-fixes-for-linus
>
> Abhilash Kesavan (3):
> ARM: S3C24XX: Fix Demux error in UART3 irqs on S3C2443 and S3C2416
> ARM: S3C24XX: Fix UART3 submask on S3C2416 and S3C2443
> ARM: S5PV210: Fix sysdev related warning messages
>
> Darius Augulis (1):
> ARM: S3C64XX: fix uart clock setup for mini6410/real6410
>
> Kukjin Kim (1):
> ARM: S3C24XX: Fix wrong s3c_gpio_cfgpull
>
> Vasily Khoruzhick (1):
> ARM: S3C2410: Adapt h1940-bluetooth to gpiolib changes
>
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/h1940-bluetooth.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2416/irq.c | 5 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2443/irq.c | 5 ++---
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkc110.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/spi-bus0-gpe11_12_13.c | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/spi-bus1-gpd8_9_10.c | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/spi-bus1-gpg5_6_7.c | 6 +++---
> 10 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>

2010-11-30 00:23:28

by Kukjin Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes for 2.6.37-rc4

Darius Augulis wrote:
>
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,

> you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" again.
> Please, don't forget to add it to your tree, better do it right now.
> Perhaps it's fifth or sixth time when remind about that...
>
I remember, I've replied about that like following.
Maybe you missed...

---
> you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" which is hanging here
> for a long time and was decided to merge in 2.6.37-rc1.
> Please, pick it up.
>
Hmm...I thought it should be handled by Ben Dooks at that time.

Anyway, as Ben said, I'm thinking it should be sent upstream when merge
window
even though have missed it in the last merge window.

However, if Ben is ok to merge this during 37-rc, will merge it into
s5p-fixes-
for-linus for 37-rc.
---

But I still thinking it should be handled by Ben Dooks...

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

2010-11-30 15:49:10

by Darius Augulis

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes for 2.6.37-rc4

Hi Ben, Kukjin,

could you please both find out who must 'handle' it?
Do you think it's normal to force people to ping you for the same four
lines patch for 4 months or more?
I think, it's at least not optimal and not good for kernel development process.

thanks,
Darius


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> Darius Augulis wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" again.
>> Please, don't forget to add it to your tree, better do it right now.
>> Perhaps it's fifth or sixth time when remind about that...
>>
> I remember, I've replied about that like following.
> Maybe you missed...
>
> ---
>> you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" which is hanging here
>> for a long time and was decided to merge in 2.6.37-rc1.
>> Please, pick it up.
>>
> Hmm...I thought it should be handled by Ben Dooks at that time.
>
> Anyway, as Ben said, I'm thinking it should be sent upstream when merge
> window
> even though have missed it in the last merge window.
>
> However, if Ben is ok to merge this during 37-rc, will merge it into
> s5p-fixes-
> for-linus for 37-rc.
> ---
>
> But I still thinking it should be handled by Ben Dooks...

handle what? You have Ben ack to merge it. I'm confused how 'optimal'
is development process when have to ping the same people for the same
four lines patch for 4 months. You both Do you think I really have to
ask help for arm, serial or linux-stable maintainers to 'hadle' this?
Because I gave up believing it's possible to do by samsung
maintainers.

>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
>

2010-12-03 10:24:39

by Kukjin Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] Samsung fixes for 2.6.37-rc4

Darius Augulis wrote:
>
> Hi Ben, Kukjin,
>
Hi Darius,
Ok...I will apply this in my tree for -next with Ben's ack.

Ben, if any problems, please let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

> could you please both find out who must 'handle' it?
> Do you think it's normal to force people to ping you for the same four
> lines patch for 4 months or more?
> I think, it's at least not optimal and not good for kernel development
> process.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Darius Augulis wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kukjin,
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" again.
> >> Please, don't forget to add it to your tree, better do it right now.
> >> Perhaps it's fifth or sixth time when remind about that...
> >>
> > I remember, I've replied about that like following.
> > Maybe you missed...
> >
> > ---
> >> you have missed "serial: samsung: fix device name" which is hanging
here
> >> for a long time and was decided to merge in 2.6.37-rc1.
> >> Please, pick it up.
> >>
> > Hmm...I thought it should be handled by Ben Dooks at that time.
> >
> > Anyway, as Ben said, I'm thinking it should be sent upstream when merge
> > window
> > even though have missed it in the last merge window.
> >
> > However, if Ben is ok to merge this during 37-rc, will merge it into
> > s5p-fixes-
> > for-linus for 37-rc.
> > ---
> >
> > But I still thinking it should be handled by Ben Dooks...
>
> handle what? You have Ben ack to merge it. I'm confused how 'optimal'
> is development process when have to ping the same people for the same
> four lines patch for 4 months. You both Do you think I really have to
> ask help for arm, serial or linux-stable maintainers to 'hadle' this?
> Because I gave up believing it's possible to do by samsung
> maintainers.