2011-02-11 19:32:12

by Milan Broz

Subject: Re: LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!)

On 02/11/2011 08:23 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
> What do you mean with "configured"?
>
> I'm using loop devices with loop aes, and I've looked into /sys for a device which is actually in use.

Ehm. It is really Loop-AES?

Then ask author to backport it there, Loop-AES is not mainline code.
He usually replaces the whole upstream loop implementation with old patched version.

Milan

2011-02-11 19:41:10

by Felix Blanke

Subject: Re: LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!)

Yeah, for me its loop-aes.
Ah ok, didn't knew that it replaces that whole loop thing :)


Felix

On Feb 11, 2011 8:32 PM, "Milan Broz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 08:23 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
>> What do you mean with "configured"?
>>
>> I'm using loop devices with loop aes, and I've looked into /sys for a device which is actually in use.
>
> Ehm. It is really Loop-AES?
>
> Then ask author to backport it there, Loop-AES is not mainline code.
> He usually replaces the whole upstream loop implementation with old patched version.
>
> Milan