The rcu callback phonet_device_rcu_free() just calls a kfree(),
so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(phonet_device_rcu_free).
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
---
net/phonet/pn_dev.c | 10 +---------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/phonet/pn_dev.c b/net/phonet/pn_dev.c
index 947038d..1566672 100644
--- a/net/phonet/pn_dev.c
+++ b/net/phonet/pn_dev.c
@@ -162,14 +162,6 @@ int phonet_address_add(struct net_device *dev, u8 addr)
return err;
}
-static void phonet_device_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
-{
- struct phonet_device *pnd;
-
- pnd = container_of(head, struct phonet_device, rcu);
- kfree(pnd);
-}
-
int phonet_address_del(struct net_device *dev, u8 addr)
{
struct phonet_device_list *pndevs = phonet_device_list(dev_net(dev));
@@ -188,7 +180,7 @@ int phonet_address_del(struct net_device *dev, u8 addr)
mutex_unlock(&pndevs->lock);
if (pnd)
- call_rcu(&pnd->rcu, phonet_device_rcu_free);
+ kfree_rcu(pnd, rcu);
return err;
}
--
1.7.4
On Friday 18 March 2011 06:09:03 ext Lai Jiangshan, you wrote:
> The rcu callback phonet_device_rcu_free() just calls a kfree(),
> so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(phonet_device_rcu_free).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
In principles, that's fine with me. But I think David is not taking that kind
of not-a-fix patch at the moment...
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
From: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:09:03 +0800
>
>
> The rcu callback phonet_device_rcu_free() just calls a kfree(),
> so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(phonet_device_rcu_free).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>