The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
On 02/08/2012 01:06 AM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
Correction:
+The period of the hrtimer is 2*watchdog_thresh/5, which means it has
+two or three chances two generate an interrupt before the hardware
to
+detector kicks in.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0900, Fernando Luis V?zquez Cao wrote:
> The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
> Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: update documentation
>
> From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <[email protected]>
>
> The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
I am fine with this (just need to address Randy's little fixup).
Ingo, should I take this in and repost for you or just ack it and let
someone like Andrew take this in?
Cheers,
Don
>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<[email protected]>
> ---
>
> diff -urNp linux-3.2.5-orig/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt linux-3.2.5/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt
> --- linux-3.2.5-orig/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt 1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-3.2.5/Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt 2012-02-08 17:48:35.219915509 +0900
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +===============================================================
> +Softlockup detector and hardlockup detector (aka nmi_watchdog)
> +===============================================================
> +
> +The Linux kernel can act as a watchdog to detect both soft and hard
> +lockups.
> +
> +A 'softlockup' is defined as a bug that causes the kernel to loop in
> +kernel mode for more than 20 seconds (see "Implementation details"
> +below for details), without giving other tasks a chance to run. The
> +current stack trace is displayed upon detection and, by default, the
> +system will stay locked up. Alternatively, the kernel can be
> +configured to panic; a sysctl, "kernel.softlockup_panic", a kernel
> +parameter, "softlockup_panic" (see
> +"Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt" for details), and a compile
> +option, "BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC", are provided for this.
> +
> +A 'hardlockup' is defined as a bug that causes the CPU to loop in
> +kernel mode for more than 10 seconds (see "Implementation details"
> +below for details), without letting other interrupts have a chance to
> +run. Similarly to the softlockup case, the current stack trace is
> +displayed upon detection and the system will stay locked up unless the
> +default behavior is changed, which can be done through a compile time
> +knob, "BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC", and a kernel parameter,
> +"nmi_watchdog" (see "Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt" for
> +details).
> +
> +The panic option can be used in combination with panic_timeout (this
> +timeout is set through the confusingly named "kernel.panic" sysctl),
> +to cause the system to reboot automatically after a specified amount
> +of time.
> +
> +=== Implementation details ===
> +
> +The soft and hard lockup detectors are built on top of the hrtimer and
> +perf subsystems, respectively. A direct consequence of this is that,
> +in principle, they should work in any architecture where these
> +subsystems are present.
> +
> +An periodic hrtimer runs to generate interrupts and kick the watchdog
> +task. An NMI perf event is generated every "watchdog_thresh"
> +(compile-time initialized to 10 and configurable through sysctl of the
> +same name) seconds to check for hardlockups. If any CPU in the system
> +does not receive any hrtimer interrupt during that time the
> +'hardlockup detector' (the handler for the NMI perf event) will
> +generate a kernel warning or call panic, depending on the
> +configuration.
> +
> +The watchdog task is a high priority kernel thread that updates a
> +timestamp every time it is scheduled. If that timestamp is not updated
> +for 2*watchdog_thresh seconds (the softlockup threshold) the
> +'softlockup detector' (coded inside the hrtimer callback function)
> +will dump useful debug information to the system log, after which it
> +will call panic if it was instructed to do so or resume execution of
> +other kernel code.
> +
> +The period of the hrtimer is 2*watchdog_thresh/5, which means it has
> +two or three chances two generate an interrupt before the hardware
> +detector kicks in.
> +
> +As explained above, a kernel knob is provided that allows
> +administrators to configure the period of the hrtimer and the perf
> +event. The right value for a particular environment is a trade-off
> +between fast response to lockups and detection overhead.
> diff -urNp linux-3.2.5-orig/Documentation/nmi_watchdog.txt linux-3.2.5/Documentation/nmi_watchdog.txt
> --- linux-3.2.5-orig/Documentation/nmi_watchdog.txt 2012-01-05 08:55:44.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-3.2.5/Documentation/nmi_watchdog.txt 1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
> -
> -[NMI watchdog is available for x86 and x86-64 architectures]
> -
> -Is your system locking up unpredictably? No keyboard activity, just
> -a frustrating complete hard lockup? Do you want to help us debugging
> -such lockups? If all yes then this document is definitely for you.
> -
> -On many x86/x86-64 type hardware there is a feature that enables
> -us to generate 'watchdog NMI interrupts'. (NMI: Non Maskable Interrupt
> -which get executed even if the system is otherwise locked up hard).
> -This can be used to debug hard kernel lockups. By executing periodic
> -NMI interrupts, the kernel can monitor whether any CPU has locked up,
> -and print out debugging messages if so.
> -
> -In order to use the NMI watchdog, you need to have APIC support in your
> -kernel. For SMP kernels, APIC support gets compiled in automatically. For
> -UP, enable either CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC (Processor type and features -> Local
> -APIC support on uniprocessors) or CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC (Processor type and
> -features -> IO-APIC support on uniprocessors) in your kernel config.
> -CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is for uniprocessor machines without an IO-APIC.
> -CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC is for uniprocessor with an IO-APIC. [Note: certain
> -kernel debugging options, such as Kernel Stack Meter or Kernel Tracer,
> -may implicitly disable the NMI watchdog.]
> -
> -For x86-64, the needed APIC is always compiled in.
> -
> -Using local APIC (nmi_watchdog=2) needs the first performance register, so
> -you can't use it for other purposes (such as high precision performance
> -profiling.) However, at least oprofile and the perfctr driver disable the
> -local APIC NMI watchdog automatically.
> -
> -To actually enable the NMI watchdog, use the 'nmi_watchdog=N' boot
> -parameter. Eg. the relevant lilo.conf entry:
> -
> - append="nmi_watchdog=1"
> -
> -For SMP machines and UP machines with an IO-APIC use nmi_watchdog=1.
> -For UP machines without an IO-APIC use nmi_watchdog=2, this only works
> -for some processor types. If in doubt, boot with nmi_watchdog=1 and
> -check the NMI count in /proc/interrupts; if the count is zero then
> -reboot with nmi_watchdog=2 and check the NMI count. If it is still
> -zero then log a problem, you probably have a processor that needs to be
> -added to the nmi code.
> -
> -A 'lockup' is the following scenario: if any CPU in the system does not
> -execute the period local timer interrupt for more than 5 seconds, then
> -the NMI handler generates an oops and kills the process. This
> -'controlled crash' (and the resulting kernel messages) can be used to
> -debug the lockup. Thus whenever the lockup happens, wait 5 seconds and
> -the oops will show up automatically. If the kernel produces no messages
> -then the system has crashed so hard (eg. hardware-wise) that either it
> -cannot even accept NMI interrupts, or the crash has made the kernel
> -unable to print messages.
> -
> -Be aware that when using local APIC, the frequency of NMI interrupts
> -it generates, depends on the system load. The local APIC NMI watchdog,
> -lacking a better source, uses the "cycles unhalted" event. As you may
> -guess it doesn't tick when the CPU is in the halted state (which happens
> -when the system is idle), but if your system locks up on anything but the
> -"hlt" processor instruction, the watchdog will trigger very soon as the
> -"cycles unhalted" event will happen every clock tick. If it locks up on
> -"hlt", then you are out of luck -- the event will not happen at all and the
> -watchdog won't trigger. This is a shortcoming of the local APIC watchdog
> --- unfortunately there is no "clock ticks" event that would work all the
> -time. The I/O APIC watchdog is driven externally and has no such shortcoming.
> -But its NMI frequency is much higher, resulting in a more significant hit
> -to the overall system performance.
> -
> -On x86 nmi_watchdog is disabled by default so you have to enable it with
> -a boot time parameter.
> -
> -It's possible to disable the NMI watchdog in run-time by writing "0" to
> -/proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog. Writing "1" to the same file will re-enable
> -the NMI watchdog. Notice that you still need to use "nmi_watchdog=" parameter
> -at boot time.
> -
> -NOTE: In kernels prior to 2.4.2-ac18 the NMI-oopser is enabled unconditionally
> -on x86 SMP boxes.
> -
> -[ feel free to send bug reports, suggestions and patches to
> - Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> or the Linux SMP mailing
> - list at <[email protected]> ]
> -
On 02/09/2012 03:43 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0900, Fernando Luis V?zquez Cao wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: update documentation
>>
>> From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<[email protected]>
>>
>> The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
>> and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
> I am fine with this (just need to address Randy's little fixup).
>
> Ingo, should I take this in and repost for you or just ack it and let
> someone like Andrew take this in?
Fixed version attached.
Thanks,
Fernando
Hi Don,
Could you pick up the attached patch too?
Thanks,
Fernando
Hi Don,
This is the last of the documentation fixes.
I am preparing some bug fixes now.
Thanks,
Fernando
* Don Zickus <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0900, Fernando Luis V?zquez Cao wrote:
> > The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> > and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: update documentation
> >
> > From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <[email protected]>
> >
> > The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> > and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
>
> I am fine with this (just need to address Randy's little
> fixup).
>
> Ingo, should I take this in and repost for you or just ack it
> and let someone like Andrew take this in?
Yeah, would be nice to have it with Randy's ack and your
signoff, can apply it then.
Thanks,
Ingo
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:43:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Don Zickus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0900, Fernando Luis V?zquez Cao wrote:
> > > The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> > > and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: update documentation
> > >
> > > From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
> > > and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
> >
> > I am fine with this (just need to address Randy's little
> > fixup).
> >
> > Ingo, should I take this in and repost for you or just ack it
> > and let someone like Andrew take this in?
>
> Yeah, would be nice to have it with Randy's ack and your
> signoff, can apply it then.
Ok, thanks!
Cheers,
Don
On 02/08/2012 11:43 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Don Zickus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0900, Fernando Luis V?zquez Cao wrote:
>>> The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
>>> and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: update documentation
>>>
>>> From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> The soft and hard lockup detectors are now built on top of the hrtimer
>>> and perf subsystems. Update the documentation accordingly.
>>
>> I am fine with this (just need to address Randy's little
>> fixup).
>>
>> Ingo, should I take this in and repost for you or just ack it
>> and let someone like Andrew take this in?
>
> Yeah, would be nice to have it with Randy's ack and your
> signoff, can apply it then.
updated patch:
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***