[ Expanded cc ]
On 2/17/12 5:39 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> I've been trying to debug this strange problem with recent 3.2 kernels:
>
> # boot to single user mode
> # service network start
> # ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr <blah>
> inet addr:10.47.46.39 Bcast:10.47.46.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>
> <Link is up>
> # strace route add default gw 10.47.46.1
> ioctl(3, SIOCADDRT, 0x7fff1fd4db80) = -1 ESRCH (No such process)
I git bisected the problem to this commit:
commit 3630b7c050d9c3564f143d595339fc06b888d6f3
Author: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Feb 1 15:15:39 2011 -0800
ipv4: Remove fib_hash.
which came in via 2.6.39.
> If there are any semantic differences found in fib_trie, we should
> simply fix them.
Looks like the problem I'm running into falls into this bucket (since it
goes away if I revert the commit).
I changed the pr_debug() in fib_trie.c to pr_info() and got some debug
output (attached).
Based on the debug info, I think it's this call that's failing with ESRCH:
[ 69.189627] Insert table=254 00000000/0
/sbin/route -V
net-tools 1.60
route 1.98 (2001-04-15)
# cat /proc/net/fib_trie
Local:
+-- 0.0.0.0/1 1 0 0
+-- 10.47.46.0/24 1 0 0
+-- 10.47.46.0/26 1 0 0
|-- 10.47.46.0
/32 link BROADCAST
|-- 10.47.46.39
/32 host LOCAL
|-- 10.47.46.255
/32 link BROADCAST
+-- 127.0.0.0/8 1 0 0
+-- 127.0.0.0/31 1 0 0
|-- 127.0.0.0
/32 link BROADCAST
/8 host LOCAL
|-- 127.0.0.1
/32 host LOCAL
|-- 127.255.255.255
/32 link BROADCAST
Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
-Arun
Hello,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Arun Sharma wrote:
> [ Expanded cc ]
>
> On 2/17/12 5:39 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> > I've been trying to debug this strange problem with recent 3.2 kernels:
> >
> > # boot to single user mode
> > # service network start
> > # ifconfig eth0
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr <blah>
> > inet addr:10.47.46.39 Bcast:10.47.46.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> >
> > <Link is up>
> > # strace route add default gw 10.47.46.1
> > ioctl(3, SIOCADDRT, 0x7fff1fd4db80) = -1 ESRCH (No such process)
>
> I git bisected the problem to this commit:
>
> commit 3630b7c050d9c3564f143d595339fc06b888d6f3
> Author: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue Feb 1 15:15:39 2011 -0800
>
> ipv4: Remove fib_hash.
>
> which came in via 2.6.39.
>
> > If there are any semantic differences found in fib_trie, we should
> > simply fix them.
>
> Looks like the problem I'm running into falls into this bucket (since it goes
> away if I revert the commit).
>
> I changed the pr_debug() in fib_trie.c to pr_info() and got some debug output
> (attached).
>
> Based on the debug info, I think it's this call that's failing with ESRCH:
Why the subnet is deleted from table main (254) in
the same second ?
First default route is removed:
[ 44.351839] Deleting 00000000/0 tos=0 t=ffff880212b846a0
[ 44.351843] entering trie_leaf_remove(ffff880213d120e0)
[ 44.351846] In tnode_resize ffff880213d0a5a0 inflate_threshold=50
threshold=25
Then link route 10.47.46.0/24:
[ 44.351852] Deleting 0a2f2e00/24 tos=0 t=ffff880212b846a0
[ 44.351855] entering trie_leaf_remove(ffff880211585150)
Insert tries to find if GW 10.47.46.1 is reachable,
there must be 10.47.46.0/24 in table main but it was
deleted just before adding the IP.
[ 69.189627] Insert table=254 00000000/0
> [ 69.189627] Insert table=254 00000000/0
>
> /sbin/route -V
> net-tools 1.60
> route 1.98 (2001-04-15)
>
> # cat /proc/net/fib_trie
Where is "Main:" here?
> Local:
> +-- 0.0.0.0/1 1 0 0
> +-- 10.47.46.0/24 1 0 0
> +-- 10.47.46.0/26 1 0 0
> |-- 10.47.46.0
> /32 link BROADCAST
> |-- 10.47.46.39
> /32 host LOCAL
> |-- 10.47.46.255
> /32 link BROADCAST
> +-- 127.0.0.0/8 1 0 0
> +-- 127.0.0.0/31 1 0 0
> |-- 127.0.0.0
> /32 link BROADCAST
> /8 host LOCAL
> |-- 127.0.0.1
> /32 host LOCAL
> |-- 127.255.255.255
> /32 link BROADCAST
>
> Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
The only place that returns ESRCH during insert is
net/core/fib_rules.c fib_rules_lookup(). Are you sure that
some daemon is not monitoring your actions and playing
with the ip rules and routes? May be during 'route add'
there are no ip rules and the link route is removed too.
Is the problem some race with such routing daemon?
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
On 2/22/12 1:27 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Why the subnet is deleted from table main (254) in
> the same second ?
The machine was in single user mode. All I did was execute
# service network start
dhclient is the only user process I see running on the system.
>
> First default route is removed:
>
> [ 44.351839] Deleting 00000000/0 tos=0 t=ffff880212b846a0
> [ 44.351843] entering trie_leaf_remove(ffff880213d120e0)
> [ 44.351846] In tnode_resize ffff880213d0a5a0 inflate_threshold=50
> threshold=25
>
> Then link route 10.47.46.0/24:
>
> [ 44.351852] Deleting 0a2f2e00/24 tos=0 t=ffff880212b846a0
> [ 44.351855] entering trie_leaf_remove(ffff880211585150)
>
> Insert tries to find if GW 10.47.46.1 is reachable,
> there must be 10.47.46.0/24 in table main but it was
> deleted just before adding the IP.
>
> [ 69.189627] Insert table=254 00000000/0
>
All of this was done by my network startup scripts. These scripts should
be fairly standard and used by lots of other people. The only thing
that's special about my setup is:
# grep LINKDELAY /etc/sysconfig/network
LINKDELAY=20
Without this my eth0 driver complains about link not being ready.
>> # cat /proc/net/fib_trie
>
> Where is "Main:" here?
I think answering this is key.
This is the main difference between systems that work and the ones that
don't. Systems that work have a non-empty Main table:
# cat /proc/net/fib_trie
Main:
+-- 0.0.0.0/0 4 3 10
+-- 0.0.0.0/4 1 0 0
|-- 0.0.0.0
/0 universe THROW
I'll try to figure out why my RT_TABLE_MAIN was empty after my network
startup scripts finished. But given my experience with 2.6.38, fib_hash
handled this case just fine and fib_trie broke it :(
-Arun
On 2/22/12 1:52 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
> I'll try to figure out why my RT_TABLE_MAIN was empty after my network
> startup scripts finished. But given my experience with 2.6.38, fib_hash
> handled this case just fine and fib_trie broke it :(
>
Turns out that we had a /sbin/ifup-local that deleted all the routes
including default gw and populated the route afresh.
route del default gw ...
ip route | grep -v scope | awk '{print $1}' | while read route; do ip
route flush $route; done
This worked fine with fib_hash, but breaks with fib_trie. I'll
investigate why this was done and look for a workaround if possible.
-Arun
From: Arun Sharma <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:03:11 -0800
> Turns out that we had a /sbin/ifup-local that deleted all the routes
> including default gw and populated the route afresh.
>
> route del default gw ...
> ip route | grep -v scope | awk '{print $1}' | while read route; do ip
> route flush $route; done
>
> This worked fine with fib_hash, but breaks with fib_trie. I'll
> investigate why this was done and look for a workaround if possible.
It breaks because that script sequence quoted above depends upon the
order in which the routes are listed. Since fib_hash and fib_trie use
different datastructures, the order in which route entries are dumped
will not be the same and this is completely unavoidable.
You therefore must not, and can not, have scripts which have such a
dependency.
Hello,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Arun Sharma wrote:
> Without this my eth0 driver complains about link not being ready.
>
> > > # cat /proc/net/fib_trie
> >
> > Where is "Main:" here?
>
> I think answering this is key.
Main is not printed only when the main table is
empty. The table name is printed only if there are nodes
in the table. May be all rules (ESRCH) and all routes (no Main)
are flushed.
> This is the main difference between systems that work and the ones that don't.
> Systems that work have a non-empty Main table:
>
> # cat /proc/net/fib_trie
> Main:
> +-- 0.0.0.0/0 4 3 10
> +-- 0.0.0.0/4 1 0 0
> |-- 0.0.0.0
> /0 universe THROW
>
> I'll try to figure out why my RT_TABLE_MAIN was empty after my network startup
> scripts finished. But given my experience with 2.6.38, fib_hash handled this
> case just fine and fib_trie broke it :(
printk for current->comm should show the process name
that removes the routes. If problem is ifup-local I remember
only for one difference: fib_trie can list 0.0.0.0/0 before
other routes but ip route flush default simply removes all
routes, even on old kernels. May be route del default gw...
does not delete the default route and then
'ip route flush default' does the bad job.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
On 2/22/12 3:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> It breaks because that script sequence quoted above depends upon the
> order in which the routes are listed. Since fib_hash and fib_trie use
> different datastructures, the order in which route entries are dumped
> will not be the same and this is completely unavoidable.
Here's a minimal repro case:
# ip route flush default
# route add default gw 192.168.143.2
SIOCADDRT: No such process
This fails for me on both 2.6.38 and 3.2.
I think the dependency we have is the actual format of the default route
entry:
fib_hash:
# ip route
<bunch of routes>
throw default
fib_trie:
# ip route
default via 192.168.143.2 dev eth0 proto static
<bunch of routes>
when the output was piped to awk '{ print $1 }' we ended up deleting the
default route for fib_trie case, but not the fib_hash case.
I'll just fix up our scripts. Thanks for looking into it.
-Arun