2012-05-08 00:24:25

by Tilman Schmidt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ISDN patches for net-next

On 26.04.2012 01:02, /me wrote:
> here's a series of eight patches to the Kernel CAPI subsystem and
> the Gigaset driver. Please consider for application to net-next.
> The first three should also go into -stable and are tagged accordingly.

Is there anything missing for these to be accepted into net-next?
Or should I just be patient?

Thanks,
Tilman

> Tilman Schmidt (8):
> isdn/gigaset: ratelimit CAPI message dumps
> isdn/gigaset: fix CAPI disconnect B3 handling
> isdn/gigaset: improve error handling querying firmware version
> isdn/gigaset: fix readability damage
> isdn/gigaset: internal function name cleanup
> isdn/gigaset: unify function return values
> isdn/capi: fix readability damage
> isdn/capi: elliminate capincci_find() in non-middleware case

--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected]
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Unge?ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R?ckseite)


Attachments:
signature.asc (262.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2012-05-08 02:29:28

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ISDN patches for net-next

From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 02:24:17 +0200

> On 26.04.2012 01:02, /me wrote:
>> here's a series of eight patches to the Kernel CAPI subsystem and
>> the Gigaset driver. Please consider for application to net-next.
>> The first three should also go into -stable and are tagged accordingly.
>
> Is there anything missing for these to be accepted into net-next?
> Or should I just be patient?

I'll take care of it, I just put them back into "under review" state
in patchwork.

2012-05-08 02:42:38

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ISDN patches for net-next

From: David Miller <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 22:29:12 -0400 (EDT)

> From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 02:24:17 +0200
>
>> On 26.04.2012 01:02, /me wrote:
>>> here's a series of eight patches to the Kernel CAPI subsystem and
>>> the Gigaset driver. Please consider for application to net-next.
>>> The first three should also go into -stable and are tagged accordingly.
>>
>> Is there anything missing for these to be accepted into net-next?
>> Or should I just be patient?
>
> I'll take care of it, I just put them back into "under review" state
> in patchwork.

All applied and pushed out to net-next, thanks Tilman.