On 05/19/2012 09:30 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> The cpu on stack is not needed, so remove it.
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Mon May 14 20:50:38 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat May 19 15:18:24 2012
> @@ -2822,8 +2822,7 @@ void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu);
> */
> void scheduler_tick(void)
> {
> - int cpu __maybe_unused = smp_processor_id();
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
>
> sched_clock_tick();
> /* grq lock not grabbed, so only update rq clock */
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hillf, I noticed you posting a few patches to BFS recently. Just wanted
to make you aware that there is a certain erm communication issue
between the kernel maintainers and the author of BFS. Since he is busy
in real life you should contact him directly or cc him. See tail -1
Documentation/scheduler/sched-BFS.txt for email.
Hi Martin
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hillf, I noticed you posting a few patches to BFS recently. Just wanted to
> make you aware that there is a certain erm communication issue between the
Would you please feel free to elaborate on the issue, btw?
I'd stop posting, yes?
> kernel maintainers and the author of BFS. Since he is busy in real life you
> should contact him directly or cc him. See tail -1
Fine, lets disturb less.
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-BFS.txt for email.