On 06/01/2012 07:52 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
>
> Ok,
>
> the following patchset should take care of all the {rd,wr}msrl_amd_safe
> headaches we had this week. After it is applied, the AMD-specific
> variants become private to amd.c and issue a warning when used on
> anything else beside K8.
>
> This also contains the two patches from Andre which cleanup the PV-side
> of things.
>
Looks good. This can be for 3.6, right (no immediate urgency)?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 07:53:26AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Looks good. This can be for 3.6, right (no immediate urgency)?
None on arch/x86/ - simply correctness fixes.
And I'm assuming since you took Konrad's patch, there are no pending
issues for xen either.
So yeah, this can wait for 3.6, IMHO.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
On 06/01/2012 07:57 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 07:53:26AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Looks good. This can be for 3.6, right (no immediate urgency)?
>
> None on arch/x86/ - simply correctness fixes.
>
> And I'm assuming since you took Konrad's patch, there are no pending
> issues for xen either.
>
> So yeah, this can wait for 3.6, IMHO.
>
Great! Will queue up shortly.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.