Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c between commit bcb7ad7bcbef
("ath9k: Fix softlockup in AR9485") from the wireless tree and commit
ef1b6cd9a1ba ("ath9k: Group link monitoring logic") from the net-next
tree.
The latter removes the code modified by the former, so I did that. The
fix from the former patch may be needed elsewhere now.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
Hi Stephen,
On Thursday 14 June 2012 08:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c between commit bcb7ad7bcbef
> ("ath9k: Fix softlockup in AR9485") from the wireless tree and commit
> ef1b6cd9a1ba ("ath9k: Group link monitoring logic") from the net-next
> tree.
>
> The latter removes the code modified by the former, so I did that. The
> fix from the former patch may be needed elsewhere now.
the back ported version of this patch is recently sent
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg92125.html
--
thanks,
shafi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:20:13AM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Thursday 14 June 2012 08:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> >drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c between commit bcb7ad7bcbef
> >("ath9k: Fix softlockup in AR9485") from the wireless tree and commit
> >ef1b6cd9a1ba ("ath9k: Group link monitoring logic") from the net-next
> >tree.
> >
> >The latter removes the code modified by the former, so I did that. The
> >fix from the former patch may be needed elsewhere now.
That sounds right.
> the back ported version of this patch is recently sent
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg92125.html
I have it in wireless-next already...thanks!
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.