This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.10.207-rc1
Alexander Atanasov <[email protected]>
scsi: core: Always send batch on reset or error handling command
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "scsi: core: Add scsi_prot_ref_tag() helper"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "scsi: core: Introduce scsi_get_sector()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "scsi: core: Make scsi_get_lba() return the LBA"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "scsi: core: Use scsi_cmd_to_rq() instead of scsi_cmnd.request"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "scsi: core: Use a structure member to track the SCSI command submitter"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "scsi: core: Always send batch on reset or error handling command"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c | 18 ++++++++----------
drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h | 1 -
include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h | 29 +++--------------------------
include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 16 +++++++---------
8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 1/11/24 01:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:52:49AM +0100:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 9d64f2ec9cf9 ("Linux 5.10.207-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.207-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 9d64f2ec9cf9d1a55dabce3c7f639ec26bd1d7b4
* git describe: v5.10.206-8-g9d64f2ec9cf9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10206-8-g9d64f2ec9cf9
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)
## Test result summary
total: 99306, pass: 75376, fail: 4061, skip: 19792, xfail: 77
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 117 total, 117 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:52:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.207 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 13 Jan 2024 09:46:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.207-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
68 tests: 68 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.207-rc1-g9d64f2ec9cf9
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
Jon