2021-03-04 15:19:01

by Tony Lindgren

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove extra of_node_put()

We have of_translate_address() already do of_node_put() as needed.
I probably looked at __of_translate_address() earlier by accident
that of_translate_address() uses.

Fixes: 52762fbd1c47 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource support")
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
@@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ static void __init dmtimer_systimer_assign_alwon(void)
pa == 0x48318000)
continue;

- of_node_put(np);
break;
}
}
@@ -300,7 +299,6 @@ static u32 __init dmtimer_systimer_find_first_available(void)
continue;
}

- of_node_put(np);
break;
}
}
--
2.30.1


2021-03-05 00:57:44

by Grygorii Strashko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove extra of_node_put()



On 04/03/2021 09:21, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We have of_translate_address() already do of_node_put() as needed.
> I probably looked at __of_translate_address() earlier by accident
> that of_translate_address() uses.

I do not see of_node_put() in of_translate_address() and
__of_translate_address() is doing of_node_get(dev);
?

>
> Fixes: 52762fbd1c47 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource support")
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
> @@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ static void __init dmtimer_systimer_assign_alwon(void)
> pa == 0x48318000)
> continue;
>
> - of_node_put(np);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -300,7 +299,6 @@ static u32 __init dmtimer_systimer_find_first_available(void)
> continue;
> }
>
> - of_node_put(np);
> break;
> }
> }
>

--
Best regards,
grygorii

2021-03-05 07:50:50

by Tony Lindgren

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove extra of_node_put()

* Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]> [210304 20:56]:
>
>
> On 04/03/2021 09:21, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > We have of_translate_address() already do of_node_put() as needed.
> > I probably looked at __of_translate_address() earlier by accident
> > that of_translate_address() uses.
>
> I do not see of_node_put() in of_translate_address() and
> __of_translate_address() is doing of_node_get(dev);
> ?

Oh right.. this is confusing.. Yeah we can ignore this patch.
We should have the use count set for only the system timer(s)
we claim.

Regards,

Tony

2021-03-08 15:30:01

by Tony Lindgren

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove extra of_node_put()

Hi,

* Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> [210305 07:58]:
> * Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]> [210304 20:56]:
> >
> >
> > On 04/03/2021 09:21, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > We have of_translate_address() already do of_node_put() as needed.
> > > I probably looked at __of_translate_address() earlier by accident
> > > that of_translate_address() uses.
> >
> > I do not see of_node_put() in of_translate_address() and
> > __of_translate_address() is doing of_node_get(dev);
> > ?
>
> Oh right.. this is confusing.. Yeah we can ignore this patch.
> We should have the use count set for only the system timer(s)
> we claim.

Daniel, would you like me to repost this series with this patch dropped?

Regards,

Tony

2021-03-20 22:18:02

by Daniel Lezcano

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Remove extra of_node_put()

On 08/03/2021 16:26, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> [210305 07:58]:
>> * Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]> [210304 20:56]:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/03/2021 09:21, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> We have of_translate_address() already do of_node_put() as needed.
>>>> I probably looked at __of_translate_address() earlier by accident
>>>> that of_translate_address() uses.
>>>
>>> I do not see of_node_put() in of_translate_address() and
>>> __of_translate_address() is doing of_node_get(dev);
>>> ?
>>
>> Oh right.. this is confusing.. Yeah we can ignore this patch.
>> We should have the use count set for only the system timer(s)
>> we claim.
>
> Daniel, would you like me to repost this series with this patch dropped?

No, it is ok. I will take care of not picking it.

Thanks
-- Daniel



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog