2018-11-14 22:35:30

by Colin King

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH][next] block: clean up dead code that is now redundant

From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>

The boolean next_sorted is set to false and is never changed, hence
the code that checks if it is true is dead code and can now be
removed. This dead code occurred from a previous commit that cleaned
up the elevator and removed the setting of next_sorted to true.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1475401 ("'Constant' variable guards
dead code")

Fixes: a1ce35fa4985 ("block: remove dead elevator code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
block/elevator.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 19351ffa56b1..796436270682 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -394,18 +394,11 @@ void elv_merge_requests(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
struct request *next)
{
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
- bool next_sorted = false;

if (e->type->ops.requests_merged)
e->type->ops.requests_merged(q, rq, next);

elv_rqhash_reposition(q, rq);
-
- if (next_sorted) {
- elv_rqhash_del(q, next);
- q->nr_sorted--;
- }
-
q->last_merge = rq;
}

--
2.19.1



2018-11-14 22:28:04

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] block: clean up dead code that is now redundant

On 11/14/18 3:17 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>
> The boolean next_sorted is set to false and is never changed, hence
> the code that checks if it is true is dead code and can now be
> removed. This dead code occurred from a previous commit that cleaned
> up the elevator and removed the setting of next_sorted to true.

Ah nice, it's also the last "user" of q->nr_sorted, so that one can
go away as well.

--
Jens Axboe