2020-01-24 00:18:08

by Lyude Paul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures on disable

Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.

This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:

[drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 ) 01/31/2019
RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
Call Trace:
? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---

Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
MST displays.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
index 069b7a6f5597..252fa60c6775 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
}

+ /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);

/* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
@@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(

get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);

- if (ret)
+ if (ret && !enable)
return false;

return true;
@@ -299,9 +300,9 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
return false;

+ /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
-
- if (ret)
+ if (enable && ret)
return false;

if (!enable)
--
2.24.1


2020-01-24 15:18:57

by Harry Wentland

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures on disable

On 2020-01-23 7:06 p.m., Lyude Paul wrote:
> Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
> topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
> the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
> can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
> idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
> Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
> process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
> DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
>
> This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
> causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
>
> [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
> update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
> nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
> nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
> vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
> videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
> snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
> ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
> sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
> wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
> rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
> crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
> rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
> CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
> Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 ) 01/31/2019
> RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
> 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
> 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
> RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
> RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
> R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
> FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
> Call Trace:
> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
> ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
> ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
> ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
> ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
> dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
> ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
> ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
> amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
> ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
> ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
> ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
> ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
> ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
> commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
> drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
> drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
> ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
> Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
> ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
> f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
> RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
> RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
> R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
> ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
>
> Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
> MST displays.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

LGTM but would like Mikita or Wayne to have a look as well.
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>

Harry

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> index 069b7a6f5597..252fa60c6775 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> }
>
> + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
> ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
>
> /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
> @@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
>
> get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
>
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret && !enable)
> return false;
>
> return true;
> @@ -299,9 +300,9 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
> return false;
>
> + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
> ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> -
> - if (ret)
> + if (enable && ret)
> return false;
>
> if (!enable)
>

2020-01-24 20:56:02

by Mikita Lipski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures on disable



On 1/24/20 9:55 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2020-01-23 7:06 p.m., Lyude Paul wrote:
>> Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
>> topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
>> the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
>> can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
>> idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
>> Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
>> process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
>> DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
>>
>> This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
>> causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
>>
>> [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
>> update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
>> Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
>> nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
>> nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
>> vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
>> snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
>> videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
>> snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
>> ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
>> sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
>> wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
>> rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
>> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
>> crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
>> rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
>> CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
>> Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 ) 01/31/2019
>> RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
>> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
>> 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
>> 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
>> RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
>> RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
>> RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
>> RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
>> R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
>> FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
>> Call Trace:
>> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
>> dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
>> ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
>> ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
>> core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
>> dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
>> ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
>> ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
>> dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
>> ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
>> ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
>> amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
>> ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
>> ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
>> ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
>> ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
>> ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
>> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>> ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
>> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>> ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
>> commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
>> drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
>> drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
>> drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
>> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
>> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
>> drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
>> drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
>> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
>> amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
>> do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
>> ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
>> do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>> RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
>> Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
>> ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
>> f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>> RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
>> RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
>> RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
>> R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
>> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
>> ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
>>
>> Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
>> MST displays.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>
> LGTM but would like Mikita or Wayne to have a look as well.
> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>


I think its a good change and it definetely helps to deal with
discreptency between drm and dc payload allocation tables.
But I think we might not even need extra enable checks.

>
> Harry
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>> index 069b7a6f5597..252fa60c6775 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
>> drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
>> }
>>
>> + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
>> ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
>>
>> /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
>> @@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
>>
>> get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
>>
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret && !enable)
>> return false;

Wouldn't it be better to check ret value, and instead of returning false
just throw DRM_ERROR message, since drm_dp_update_payload_part1 only
returns error if a port is not validated?

Thank you,
Mikita

>>
>> return true;
>> @@ -299,9 +300,9 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
>> if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
>> return false;
>>
>> + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
>> ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
>> -
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (enable && ret)
>> return false;
>>
>> if (!enable)

2020-01-24 21:00:29

by Lyude Paul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures on disable



On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 11:39 -0500, Mikita Lipski wrote:
>
> On 1/24/20 9:55 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> > On 2020-01-23 7:06 p.m., Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
> > > topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
> > > the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
> > > can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
> > > idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
> > > Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
> > > process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
> > > DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
> > >
> > > This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
> > > causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
> > >
> > > [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
> > > update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
> > > nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
> > > nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
> > > vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
> > > snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
> > > videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
> > > snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
> > > ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
> > > sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
> > > wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
> > > rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
> > > drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
> > > crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
> > > rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
> > > CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-
> > > rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
> > > Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 )
> > > 01/31/2019
> > > RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
> > > 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
> > > 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
> > > RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
> > > RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
> > > R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
> > > R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
> > > FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000)
> > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
> > > Call Trace:
> > > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > > dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
> > > ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > > core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > > dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
> > > ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
> > > ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
> > > ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
> > > amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
> > > ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
> > > ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
> > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
> > > commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
> > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > > drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
> > > drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
> > > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > > amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
> > > do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
> > > ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> > > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> > > do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
> > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > > RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
> > > Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
> > > ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
> > > f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > > RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
> > > RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
> > > RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
> > > R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
> > > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
> > > ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
> > >
> > > Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
> > > MST displays.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > LGTM but would like Mikita or Wayne to have a look as well.
> > Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
>
> I think its a good change and it definetely helps to deal with
> discreptency between drm and dc payload allocation tables.
> But I think we might not even need extra enable checks.

I think you're right here, I'll remove those in the next respin

>
> > Harry
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 7 ++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > index 069b7a6f5597..252fa60c6775 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ bool
> > > dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > > drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
> > > ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> > >
> > > /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using
> > > DPCD or
> > > @@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ bool
> > > dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > >
> > > get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
> > >
> > > - if (ret)
> > > + if (ret && !enable)
> > > return false;
>
> Wouldn't it be better to check ret value, and instead of returning false
> just throw DRM_ERROR message, since drm_dp_update_payload_part1 only
> returns error if a port is not validated?

You're right on avoiding returning here, that's probably a better idea since
we want all steps to be run even if they don't succeed. I think we can skip
the error message though, it's expected that modesets which disable displays
will happen on ports that no longer can be validated.

>
> Thank you,
> Mikita
>
> > >
> > > return true;
> > > @@ -299,9 +300,9 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> > > if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
> > > ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> > > -
> > > - if (ret)
> > > + if (enable && ret)
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > if (!enable)
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul

2020-01-24 21:02:01

by Lyude Paul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures

Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.

This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:

[drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 ) 01/31/2019
RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
Call Trace:
? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---

Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
MST displays.

Changes since v1:
* Don't return false when part 1 or part 2 of updating the payloads
fails, we don't want to abort at any step of the process even if
things fail

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
.../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
index 069b7a6f5597..318b474ff20e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
}

- ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
+ /* It's OK for this to fail */
+ drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);

/* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
* AUX message. The sequence is slot 1-63 allocated sequence for each
@@ -225,9 +226,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(

get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);

- if (ret)
- return false;
-
return true;
}

@@ -285,7 +283,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector;
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mst_mgr;
struct drm_dp_mst_port *mst_port;
- int ret;

aconnector = (struct amdgpu_dm_connector *)stream->dm_stream_context;

@@ -299,10 +296,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
return false;

- ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
-
- if (ret)
- return false;
+ /* It's OK for this to fail */
+ drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);

if (!enable)
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(mst_mgr, mst_port);
--
2.24.1

2020-01-24 21:27:08

by Mikita Lipski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures

On 1/24/20 2:10 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
> topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
> the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
> can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
> idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
> Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
> process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
> DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
>
> This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
> causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
>
> [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
> update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
> nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
> nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
> vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
> snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
> videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
> snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
> ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
> sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
> wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
> rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
> crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
> rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
> CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
> Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 ) 01/31/2019
> RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
> 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
> 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
> RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
> RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
> R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
> FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
> Call Trace:
> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
> ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
> ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
> ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
> ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
> dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
> ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
> ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
> amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
> ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
> ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
> ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
> ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
> ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
> commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
> drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
> drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
> ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
> Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
> ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
> f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
> RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
> RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
> R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
> ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
>
> Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
> MST displays.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Don't return false when part 1 or part 2 of updating the payloads
> fails, we don't want to abort at any step of the process even if
> things fail
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> .../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 13 ++++---------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> index 069b7a6f5597..318b474ff20e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> }
>
> - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> + /* It's OK for this to fail */
> + drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
>
> /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
> * AUX message. The sequence is slot 1-63 allocated sequence for each
> @@ -225,9 +226,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
>
> get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
>
> - if (ret)
> - return false;
> -

Sorry for being picky, but I think this might cause compilation error on
some systems for having unused variable (int ret). Its better just to
strip out both ret integer declarations.

Otherwise the patch is good. Thanks again!

Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <[email protected]>

Mikita

> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -285,7 +283,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector;
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mst_mgr;
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *mst_port;
> - int ret;
>
> aconnector = (struct amdgpu_dm_connector *)stream->dm_stream_context;
>
> @@ -299,10 +296,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
> return false;
>
> - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> -
> - if (ret)
> - return false;
> + /* It's OK for this to fail */
> + drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
>
> if (!enable)
> drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(mst_mgr, mst_port);
>

2020-01-24 21:49:08

by Lyude Paul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures

On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 14:20 -0500, Mikita Lipski wrote:
> On 1/24/20 2:10 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
> > topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
> > the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
> > can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
> > idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
> > Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
> > process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
> > DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
> >
> > This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
> > causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
> >
> > [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
> > update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
> > nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
> > nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
> > vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
> > snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
> > videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
> > snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
> > ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
> > sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
> > wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
> > rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
> > drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
> > crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
> > rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
> > CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-
> > rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
> > Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 )
> > 01/31/2019
> > RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
> > 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
> > 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
> > RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
> > RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
> > RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
> > R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
> > FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000)
> > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
> > Call Trace:
> > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
> > ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
> > ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
> > ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
> > ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
> > ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
> > ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
> > amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
> > ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
> > ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
> > ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
> > ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
> > ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
> > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
> > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
> > commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
> > drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> > drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
> > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
> > drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
> > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
> > do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
> > ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> > do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
> > Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
> > ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
> > f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
> > RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
> > RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
> > R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
> > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
> > ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
> >
> > Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
> > MST displays.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Don't return false when part 1 or part 2 of updating the payloads
> > fails, we don't want to abort at any step of the process even if
> > things fail
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > ---
> > .../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 13 ++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > index 069b7a6f5597..318b474ff20e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > @@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> > }
> >
> > - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> > + /* It's OK for this to fail */
> > + drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> >
> > /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
> > * AUX message. The sequence is slot 1-63 allocated sequence for each
> > @@ -225,9 +226,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> >
> > get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
> >
> > - if (ret)
> > - return false;
> > -
>
> Sorry for being picky, but I think this might cause compilation error on
> some systems for having unused variable (int ret). Its better just to
> strip out both ret integer declarations.

No problem! It wouldn't be fair if I was the only one who got to be picky
anyway ;)

>
> Otherwise the patch is good. Thanks again!
>
> Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <[email protected]>
>
> Mikita
>
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -285,7 +283,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> > struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector;
> > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mst_mgr;
> > struct drm_dp_mst_port *mst_port;
> > - int ret;
> >
> > aconnector = (struct amdgpu_dm_connector *)stream->dm_stream_context;
> >
> > @@ -299,10 +296,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> > if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
> > return false;
> >
> > - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> > -
> > - if (ret)
> > - return false;
> > + /* It's OK for this to fail */
> > + drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> >
> > if (!enable)
> > drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> >
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul

2020-01-24 22:03:03

by Lyude Paul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures

On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 16:46 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 14:20 -0500, Mikita Lipski wrote:
> > On 1/24/20 2:10 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
> > > topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
> > > the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
> > > can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
> > > idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
> > > Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
> > > process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
> > > DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
> > >
> > > This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
> > > causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
> > >
> > > [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
> > > update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
> > > nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
> > > nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
> > > vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
> > > snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
> > > videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
> > > snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
> > > ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
> > > sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
> > > wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
> > > rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
> > > drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
> > > crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
> > > rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
> > > CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-
> > > rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
> > > Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 )
> > > 01/31/2019
> > > RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
> > > 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
> > > 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
> > > RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
> > > RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
> > > R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
> > > R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
> > > FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000)
> > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
> > > Call Trace:
> > > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > > dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
> > > ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > > core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > > dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
> > > ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
> > > ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
> > > ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
> > > amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
> > > ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
> > > ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
> > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
> > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
> > > commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
> > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > > drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
> > > drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
> > > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > > amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
> > > do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
> > > ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> > > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> > > do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
> > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > > RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
> > > Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
> > > ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
> > > f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > > RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
> > > RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
> > > RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
> > > R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
> > > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
> > > ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
> > >
> > > Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
> > > MST displays.
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > * Don't return false when part 1 or part 2 of updating the payloads
> > > fails, we don't want to abort at any step of the process even if
> > > things fail
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> > > Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > ---
> > > .../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 13 ++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > index 069b7a6f5597..318b474ff20e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > @@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ bool
> > > dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > > drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> > > + /* It's OK for this to fail */
> > > + drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> > >
> > > /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using
> > > DPCD or
> > > * AUX message. The sequence is slot 1-63 allocated sequence
> > > for each
> > > @@ -225,9 +226,6 @@ bool
> > > dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > >
> > > get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
> > >
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return false;
> > > -
> >
> > Sorry for being picky, but I think this might cause compilation error on
> > some systems for having unused variable (int ret). Its better just to
> > strip out both ret integer declarations.
>
> No problem! It wouldn't be fair if I was the only one who got to be picky
> anyway ;)

Actually, I think you might have made a mistake here - ret is still used in
this function, mind double checking?

>
> > Otherwise the patch is good. Thanks again!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <[email protected]>
> >
> > Mikita
> >
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -285,7 +283,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> > > struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector;
> > > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mst_mgr;
> > > struct drm_dp_mst_port *mst_port;
> > > - int ret;
> > >
> > > aconnector = (struct amdgpu_dm_connector *)stream-
> > > >dm_stream_context;
> > >
> > > @@ -299,10 +296,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> > > if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> > > -
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return false;
> > > + /* It's OK for this to fail */
> > > + drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> > >
> > > if (!enable)
> > > drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> > >
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul

2020-01-27 13:32:36

by Mikita Lipski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures



On 1/24/20 5:01 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 16:46 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
>> On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 14:20 -0500, Mikita Lipski wrote:
>>> On 1/24/20 2:10 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
>>>> Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire MST
>>>> topology has been removed, which means that we can't communicate with
>>>> the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise, this also means that we
>>>> can't properly update payloads on the topology and as such, it's a good
>>>> idea to ignore payload update failures when disabling displays.
>>>> Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
>>>> process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in leaving
>>>> DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
>>>>
>>>> This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
>>>> causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
>>>>
>>>> [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
>>>> update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
>>>> Modules linked in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
>>>> nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
>>>> nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc sunrpc
>>>> vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic
>>>> snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
>>>> videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
>>>> snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
>>>> ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device snd_pcm
>>>> sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi ledtrig_audio snd
>>>> wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq ip_tables amdgpu(O)
>>>> rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched mmc_core i2c_algo_bit ttm
>>>> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm
>>>> crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152 mii nvme r8169 nvme_core
>>>> rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
>>>> CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O 5.5.0-
>>>> rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
>>>> Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS R12ET22W(0.22 )
>>>> 01/31/2019
>>>> RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
>>>> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f b6 06
>>>> 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f> 0b e9
>>>> 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
>>>> RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>>> RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
>>>> RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
>>>> R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
>>>> R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002
>>>> FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000)
>>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>> CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
>>>> dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
>>>> core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
>>>> dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
>>>> dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
>>>> ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
>>>> amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
>>>> ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
>>>> ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
>>>> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>>>> ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
>>>> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>>>> ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
>>>> commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
>>>> drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
>>>> drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
>>>> drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
>>>> ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>>>> ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
>>>> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
>>>> drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
>>>> drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
>>>> ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
>>>> amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
>>>> do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
>>>> ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
>>>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
>>>> do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>>> RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
>>>> Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff
>>>> ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
>>>> f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>>>> RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
>>>> RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
>>>> RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000055dbd2985d10
>>>> R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2
>>>> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000055dbd2196280
>>>> ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
>>>>
>>>> Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups with 2
>>>> MST displays.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> * Don't return false when part 1 or part 2 of updating the payloads
>>>> fails, we don't want to abort at any step of the process even if
>>>> things fail
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
>>>> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> ---
>>>> .../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 13 ++++---------
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>>>> index 069b7a6f5597..318b474ff20e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
>>>> @@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ bool
>>>> dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
>>>> drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
>>>> + /* It's OK for this to fail */
>>>> + drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
>>>>
>>>> /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using
>>>> DPCD or
>>>> * AUX message. The sequence is slot 1-63 allocated sequence
>>>> for each
>>>> @@ -225,9 +226,6 @@ bool
>>>> dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
>>>>
>>>> get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
>>>>
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - return false;
>>>> -
>>>
>>> Sorry for being picky, but I think this might cause compilation error on
>>> some systems for having unused variable (int ret). Its better just to
>>> strip out both ret integer declarations.
>>
>> No problem! It wouldn't be fair if I was the only one who got to be picky
>> anyway ;)
>
> Actually, I think you might have made a mistake here - ret is still used in
> this function, mind double checking?
>
Sorry, yes you are correct, I only meant
dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation function.

The ret variable is still used in
dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table.

>>
>>> Otherwise the patch is good. Thanks again!
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Mikita Lipski <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Mikita
>>>
>>>> return true;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -285,7 +283,6 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
>>>> struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector;
>>>> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mst_mgr;
>>>> struct drm_dp_mst_port *mst_port;
>>>> - int ret;
>>>>
>>>> aconnector = (struct amdgpu_dm_connector *)stream-
>>>>> dm_stream_context;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -299,10 +296,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
>>>> if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
>>>> return false;
>>>>
>>>> - ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
>>>> -
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - return false;
>>>> + /* It's OK for this to fail */
>>>> + drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
>>>>
>>>> if (!enable)
>>>> drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(mst_mgr, mst_port);
>>>>

--
Thanks,
Mikita Lipski
Software Engineer, AMD
[email protected]

2020-01-30 10:41:49

by Lin, Wayne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures on disable

[AMD Public Use]

Hi Lyude,

Thanks for the patch!
I'm wondering if this error still occurs with this patch applied
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11274363/
I tried to clean up all mgr->proposed_vcpis[] in this patch so
drm_dp_update_payload_part1() will skip all invalid ports.

However, I'm also thinking to improve this patch.
Maybe it is better to do cleaning proposed_vcpis[] in
dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table() due to
it is the actual place that DC try to update the status for a specific
VC stream. If it's reasonable then I'll do that in the future :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:57 AM
> To: Lipski, Mikita <[email protected]>; Wentland, Harry
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Wentland, Harry <[email protected]>; Li,
> Sun peng (Leo) <[email protected]>; Deucher, Alexander
> <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian
> <[email protected]>; Zhou, David(ChunMing)
> <[email protected]>; David Airlie <[email protected]>; Daniel Vetter
> <[email protected]>; Lakha, Bhawanpreet <[email protected]>;
> Lipski, Mikita <[email protected]>; Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>;
> David Francis <[email protected]>; Tsai, Martin
> <[email protected]>; Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Lee, Alvin
> <[email protected]>; Jean Delvare <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Lin, Wayne
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/dm/mst: Ignore payload update failures on
> disable
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2020-01-24 at 11:39 -0500, Mikita Lipski wrote:
> >
> > On 1/24/20 9:55 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> > > On 2020-01-23 7:06 p.m., Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > Disabling a display on MST can potentially happen after the entire
> > > > MST topology has been removed, which means that we can't
> > > > communicate with the topology at all in this scenario. Likewise,
> > > > this also means that we can't properly update payloads on the
> > > > topology and as such, it's a good idea to ignore payload update failures
> when disabling displays.
> > > > Currently, amdgpu makes the mistake of halting the payload update
> > > > process when any payload update failures occur, resulting in
> > > > leaving DC's local copies of the payload tables out of date.
> > > >
> > > > This ends up causing problems with hotplugging MST topologies, and
> > > > causes modesets on the second hotplug to fail like so:
> > > >
> > > > [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:1
> > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1511 at
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:2677
> > > > update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu] Modules linked
> > > > in: cdc_ether usbnet fuse xt_conntrack nf_conntrack
> > > > nf_defrag_ipv6 libcrc32c nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4
> > > > nft_counter nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc
> > > > sunrpc vfat fat wmi_bmof uvcvideo snd_hda_codec_realtek
> > > > snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi videobuf2_vmalloc
> > > > snd_hda_intel videobuf2_memops
> > > > videobuf2_v4l2 snd_intel_dspcfg videobuf2_common crct10dif_pclmul
> > > > snd_hda_codec videodev crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
> > > > ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq mc joydev pcspkr snd_seq_device
> > > > snd_pcm sp5100_tco k10temp i2c_piix4 snd_timer thinkpad_acpi
> > > > ledtrig_audio snd wmi soundcore video i2c_scmi acpi_cpufreq
> > > > ip_tables amdgpu(O) rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched
> mmc_core
> > > > i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt
> > > > fb_sys_fops cec drm crc32c_intel serio_raw hid_multitouch r8152
> > > > mii nvme r8169 nvme_core rtsx_pci pinctrl_amd
> > > > CPU: 5 PID: 1511 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G O
> 5.5.0-
> > > > rc7Lyude-Test+ #4
> > > > Hardware name: LENOVO FA495SIT26/FA495SIT26, BIOS
> R12ET22W(0.22 )
> > > > 01/31/2019
> > > > RIP: 0010:update_mst_stream_alloc_table+0x11e/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 2b 48 8d 65 e0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 5d c3 0f
> > > > b6 06
> > > > 49 89 1c 24 41 88 44 24 08 0f b6 46 01 41 88 44 24 09 eb 93 <0f>
> > > > 0b e9 2f ff ff ff e8 a6 82 a3 c2 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00
> > > > RSP: 0018:ffffac428127f5b0 EFLAGS: 00010202
> > > > RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8d1e166eee80 RCX:
> 0000000000000000
> > > > RDX: ffffac428127f668 RSI: ffff8d1e166eee80 RDI: ffffac428127f610
> > > > RBP: ffffac428127f640 R08: ffffffffc03d94a8 R09: 0000000000000000
> > > > R10: ffff8d1e24b02000 R11: ffffac428127f5b0 R12: ffff8d1e1b83d000
> > > > R13: ffff8d1e1bea0b08 R14: 0000000000000002 R15:
> 0000000000000002
> > > > FS: 00007fab23ffcd80(0000) GS:ffff8d1e28b40000(0000)
> > > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > CR2: 00007f151f1711e8 CR3: 00000005997c0000 CR4:
> 00000000003406e0
> > > > Call Trace:
> > > > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > > > dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x9a/0x210 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? dm_read_reg_func+0x39/0xb0 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > > > core_link_enable_stream+0x656/0x730 [amdgpu]
> > > > dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw+0x58e/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? dcn10_verify_allow_pstate_change_high+0x1d/0x280 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? dcn10_wait_for_mpcc_disconnect+0x3c/0x130 [amdgpu]
> > > > dc_commit_state+0x292/0x770 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? add_timer+0x101/0x1f0
> > > > ? ttm_bo_put+0x1a1/0x2f0 [ttm]
> > > > amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0xb59/0x1ff0 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? amdgpu_move_blit.constprop.0+0xb8/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? amdgpu_bo_move+0x16d/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x118/0x570 [ttm]
> > > > ? ttm_bo_validate+0x134/0x150 [ttm]
> > > > ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x1b9/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
> > > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > > ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x38/0x160
> > > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > > ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x33/0x190
> > > > commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x113/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x70/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > > > drm_mode_setcrtc+0x194/0x6a0 [drm]
> > > > ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
> > > > ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
> > > > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > > > drm_ioctl_kernel+0xaa/0xf0 [drm]
> > > > drm_ioctl+0x208/0x390 [drm]
> > > > ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [drm]
> > > > amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x49/0x80 [amdgpu]
> > > > do_vfs_ioctl+0x458/0x6d0
> > > > ksys_ioctl+0x5e/0x90
> > > > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> > > > do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
> > > > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > > > RIP: 0033:0x7fab2121f87b
> > > > Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 0d 96 2c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0
> > > > ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05
> > > > <48> 3d 01
> > > > f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 95 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > > > RSP: 002b:00007ffd045f9068 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
> > > > 0000000000000010
> > > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RCX: 00007fab2121f87b
> > > > RDX: 00007ffd045f90a0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 000000000000000b
> > > > RBP: 00007ffd045f90a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> 000055dbd2985d10
> > > > R10: 000055dbd2196280 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
> 00000000c06864a2
> > > > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> 000055dbd2196280
> > > > ---[ end trace 6ea888c24d2059cd ]---
> > > >
> > > > Note as well, I have only been able to reproduce this on setups
> > > > with 2 MST displays.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > >
> > > LGTM but would like Mikita or Wayne to have a look as well.
> > > Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
> >
> > I think its a good change and it definetely helps to deal with
> > discreptency between drm and dc payload allocation tables.
> > But I think we might not even need extra enable checks.
>
> I think you're right here, I'll remove those in the next respin
>
> >
> > > Harry
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 7
> ++++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > > index 069b7a6f5597..252fa60c6775 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
> > > > @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ bool
> > > > dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > > > drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(mst_mgr, mst_port);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
> > > > ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part1(mst_mgr);
> > > >
> > > > /* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using
> > > > DPCD or @@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ bool
> > > > dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
> > > >
> > > > get_payload_table(aconnector, proposed_table);
> > > >
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > + if (ret && !enable)
> > > > return false;
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to check ret value, and instead of returning
> > false just throw DRM_ERROR message, since drm_dp_update_payload_part1
> > only returns error if a port is not validated?
>
> You're right on avoiding returning here, that's probably a better idea since we
> want all steps to be run even if they don't succeed. I think we can skip the
> error message though, it's expected that modesets which disable displays will
> happen on ports that no longer can be validated.
>
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Mikita
> >
> > > >
> > > > return true;
> > > > @@ -299,9 +300,9 @@ bool
> dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
> > > > if (!mst_mgr->mst_state)
> > > > return false;
> > > >
> > > > + /* If disabling, it's OK for this to fail */
> > > > ret = drm_dp_update_payload_part2(mst_mgr);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > + if (enable && ret)
> > > > return false;
> > > >
> > > > if (!enable)
> --
> Cheers,
> Lyude Paul
--
Best regards,
Wayne Lin