2012-08-25 03:50:55

by Steven Rostedt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH RT 0/2] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 stable review


Dear RT Folks,

This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.41-rt62-rc1.

Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.

The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release candidate).

The pre-releases will not be pushed to the git repository, only the
final release is.

If all goes well, this patch will be converted to the next main release
on 8/29/2012 (again on the late Michael Jackson's B-day, and my
buddy Derek's)

Enjoy,

-- Steve


To build 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 directly, the following patches should be applied:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/linux-3.0.tar.xz

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/patch-3.0.41.xz

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.0/patch-3.0.41-rt62-rc1.patch.xz

You can also build from 3.0.41-rt61 by applying the incremental patch:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.0/incr/patch-3.0.41-rt61-rt62-rc1.patch.xz


Changes from 3.0.41-rt61:

---


Frank Rowand (1):
fix printk flush of messages

Steven Rostedt (1):
Linux 3.0.41-rt62-rc1

----
kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
localversion-rt | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


2012-08-27 08:14:11

by Michael Thalmeier

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/2] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 stable review

Hi,

I have tested this patch on our board (custom i.MX31 ARMv6 based) and
everything seems to be working as expected.

Thanks,
Michael

--
Scanned by MailScanner.

2012-08-27 22:54:56

by Frank Rowand

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/2] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.41-rt62-rc1 stable review

On 08/24/12 20:49, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.41-rt62-rc1.
>
> Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.

I should have looked harder when Michael requested my patch be applied to the
stable series.

My patch was part of a two patch series, sent 5/16. The first patch was
a reversal of preempt-rt-allow-immediate-magic-sysrq-output-for-preempt_rt_full.patch

The second patch works fine without the first patch. But the second patch (the one
in 3.0.41-rt62-rc1) removes the need for
preempt-rt-allow-immediate-magic-sysrq-output-for-preempt_rt_full.patch

It is not a big deal if the reversal patch gets left out of the stable releases,
but it is cleaner if it is included.

This also applies to 3.2.28-rt42-rc1

< snip >

> Changes from 3.0.41-rt61:
>
> ---
>
>
> Frank Rowand (1):
> fix printk flush of messages
>
> Steven Rostedt (1):
> Linux 3.0.41-rt62-rc1
>
> ----
> kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
> localversion-rt | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-Frank