ARP monitoring does not work when we have a network in the
following configuration:
eth0----+ +----bond0.100----br0-100---{+virtual machines
| |
+----bond0----+----br0---(fixed IP)->--{LAN arp_ip_target}
| |
eth1----+ +----bond0.200----br0-200---{+virtual machines
This patch extends bond_arp_send_all to check if a device
is also in a bridge.
This is related to the following issues:
http://launchpad.net/bugs/736226
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31822
Thanks to help from Andy Gospodarek <[email protected]>.
Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index b2530b0..cb791f6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2708,6 +2708,18 @@ static void bond_arp_send_all(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
continue;
}
+ /*
+ * Check if the target is part of a bridge.
+ */
+ if (rt->dst.dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE) {
+ /* Confirm addr is part of the bridge */
+ addr = bond_confirm_addr(rt->dst.dev, targets[i], 0);
+
+ /* Send ARP request */
+ bond_arp_send(slave->dev, ARPOP_REQUEST, targets[i], addr, 0);
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (net_ratelimit()) {
pr_warning("%s: no path to arp_ip_target %pI4 via rt.dev %s\n",
bond->dev->name, &targets[i],
--
1.7.9.5
Chris J Arges <[email protected]> wrote:
>ARP monitoring does not work when we have a network in the
>following configuration:
>
>eth0----+ +----bond0.100----br0-100---{+virtual machines
> | |
> +----bond0----+----br0---(fixed IP)->--{LAN arp_ip_target}
> | |
>eth1----+ +----bond0.200----br0-200---{+virtual machines
>
>This patch extends bond_arp_send_all to check if a device
>is also in a bridge.
>
>This is related to the following issues:
>http://launchpad.net/bugs/736226
>http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31822
>
>Thanks to help from Andy Gospodarek <[email protected]>.
>
>Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <[email protected]>
What has changed that you're up to version 3 now?
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index b2530b0..cb791f6 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -2708,6 +2708,18 @@ static void bond_arp_send_all(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
> continue;
> }
>
>+ /*
>+ * Check if the target is part of a bridge.
>+ */
/* Comment should be formatted like this.
*/
>+ if (rt->dst.dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE) {
>+ /* Confirm addr is part of the bridge */
>+ addr = bond_confirm_addr(rt->dst.dev, targets[i], 0);
>+
>+ /* Send ARP request */
I think this comment is unnecessary.
-J
>+ bond_arp_send(slave->dev, ARPOP_REQUEST, targets[i], addr, 0);
>+ continue;
>+ }
>+
> if (net_ratelimit()) {
> pr_warning("%s: no path to arp_ip_target %pI4 via rt.dev %s\n",
> bond->dev->name, &targets[i],
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, [email protected]
On 11/05/2012 04:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Chris J Arges <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ARP monitoring does not work when we have a network in the
>> following configuration:
>>
>> eth0----+ +----bond0.100----br0-100---{+virtual machines
>> | |
>> +----bond0----+----br0---(fixed IP)->--{LAN arp_ip_target}
>> | |
>> eth1----+ +----bond0.200----br0-200---{+virtual machines
>>
>> This patch extends bond_arp_send_all to check if a device
>> is also in a bridge.
>>
>> This is related to the following issues:
>> http://launchpad.net/bugs/736226
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31822
>>
>> Thanks to help from Andy Gospodarek <[email protected]>.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <[email protected]>
>
> What has changed that you're up to version 3 now?
Had (user) issues with git send-email, and wanted to send a clean patch.
Sorry about that.
>
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index b2530b0..cb791f6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -2708,6 +2708,18 @@ static void bond_arp_send_all(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Check if the target is part of a bridge.
>> + */
>
> /* Comment should be formatted like this.
> */
>
>> + if (rt->dst.dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE) {
>> + /* Confirm addr is part of the bridge */
>> + addr = bond_confirm_addr(rt->dst.dev, targets[i], 0);
>> +
>> + /* Send ARP request */
>
> I think this comment is unnecessary.
>
> -J
>
>> + bond_arp_send(slave->dev, ARPOP_REQUEST, targets[i], addr, 0);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
Great, sending v4 soon with these changes.
--chris j arges
>> if (net_ratelimit()) {
>> pr_warning("%s: no path to arp_ip_target %pI4 via rt.dev %s\n",
>> bond->dev->name, &targets[i],
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>
> ---
> -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, [email protected]
>