On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:53:42PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> vhost-blk is an in-kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>
> Due to lack of proper in-kernel AIO interface, this version converts
> guest's I/O request to bio and use submit_bio() to submit I/O directly.
> So this version any supports raw block device as guest's disk image,
> e.g. /dev/sda, /dev/ram0. We can add file based image support to
> vhost-blk once we have in-kernel AIO interface. There are some work in
> progress for in-kernel AIO interface from Dave Kleikamp and Zach Brown:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133312234313122
>
> Performance evaluation:
> -----------------------------
> 1) LKVM
> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using kvm tool
> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
> seq-read 107 121 +13.0%
> seq-write 130 179 +37.6%
> rnd-read 102 122 +19.6%
> rnd-write 125 159 +27.0%
>
> 2) QEMU
> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using QEMU
> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
> seq-read 76 123 +61.8%
> seq-write 139 173 +24.4%
> rnd-read 73 120 +64.3%
> rnd-write 75 156 +108.0%
Could you compare with dataplane qemu as well please?
>
> Userspace bits:
> -----------------------------
> 1) LKVM
> The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
> [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
>
> 2) QEMU
> The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
> [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Do not assume the buffer layout
> - Fix wakeup race
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
> - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
> - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
> - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
> - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
> - Fail un Unsupported request
> - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
> - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
>
> Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
vhost tree.
Jens, could you ack this and the bio usage in this driver
please?
> ---
> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk | 10 +
> drivers/vhost/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/vhost/blk.c | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vhost/blk.h | 8 +
> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> index 202bba6..acd8038 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ config VHOST_NET
>
> if STAGING
> source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
> +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk"
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ff8ab76
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +config VHOST_BLK
> + tristate "Host kernel accelerator for virtio blk (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> + depends on BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && m
> + ---help---
> + This kernel module can be loaded in host kernel to accelerate
> + guest block with virtio_blk. Not to be confused with virtio_blk
> + module itself which needs to be loaded in guest kernel.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> + be called vhost_blk.
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Makefile b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> index a27b053..1a8a4a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET) += vhost_net.o
> vhost_net-y := vhost.o net.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_TCM_VHOST) += tcm_vhost.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_BLK) += vhost_blk.o
> +vhost_blk-y := blk.o
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f0f118a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Taobao, Inc.
> + * Author: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
> + * Author: Asias He <[email protected]>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> + *
> + * virtio-blk server in host kernel.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
> +#include <linux/llist.h>
> +
> +#include "vhost.c"
> +#include "vhost.h"
> +#include "blk.h"
> +
> +static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_blk_index_ida);
> +
> +enum {
> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_REQ = 0,
> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX = 1,
> +};
> +
> +struct req_page_list {
> + struct page **pages;
> + int pages_nr;
> +};
> +
> +struct vhost_blk_req {
> + struct llist_node llnode;
> + struct req_page_list *pl;
> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
> +
> + struct iovec *iov;
> + int iov_nr;
> +
> + struct bio **bio;
> + atomic_t bio_nr;
> +
> + struct iovec status[1];
> +
> + sector_t sector;
> + int write;
> + u16 head;
> + long len;
> +};
> +
> +struct vhost_blk {
> + struct task_struct *host_kick;
Could you please add a comment here explaining why
is this better than using the builtin vhost thread?
> + struct iovec iov[UIO_MAXIOV];
> + struct vhost_blk_req *reqs;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue vq;
> + struct llist_head llhead;
> + struct vhost_dev dev;
> + u16 reqs_nr;
> + int index;
> +};
> +
> +static int move_iovec(struct iovec *from, struct iovec *to,
> + size_t len, int iov_count)
> +{
> + int seg = 0;
> + size_t size;
> +
> + while (len && seg < iov_count) {
> + if (from->iov_len == 0) {
> + ++from;
> + continue;
> + }
> + size = min(from->iov_len, len);
> + to->iov_base = from->iov_base;
> + to->iov_len = size;
> + from->iov_len -= size;
> + from->iov_base += size;
> + len -= size;
> + ++from;
> + ++to;
> + ++seg;
> + }
> + return seg;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int iov_num_pages(struct iovec *iov)
> +{
> + return (PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)iov->iov_base + iov->iov_len) -
> + ((unsigned long)iov->iov_base & PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_setup(struct vhost_blk *blk)
> +{
> + blk->reqs_nr = blk->vq.num;
> +
> + blk->reqs = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vhost_blk_req) * blk->reqs_nr,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!blk->reqs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int vhost_blk_set_status(struct vhost_blk_req *req, u8 status)
> +{
> + struct vhost_blk *blk = req->blk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = memcpy_toiovecend(req->status, &status, 0, sizeof(status));
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + vq_err(&blk->vq, "Failed to write status\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_blk_enable_vq(struct vhost_blk *blk,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + wake_up_process(blk->host_kick);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_blk_req_done(struct bio *bio, int err)
> +{
> + struct vhost_blk_req *req = bio->bi_private;
> + struct vhost_blk *blk = req->blk;
> +
> + if (err)
> + req->len = err;
> +
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&req->bio_nr)) {
> + llist_add(&req->llnode, &blk->llhead);
> + wake_up_process(blk->host_kick);
> + }
> +
> + bio_put(bio);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_blk_req_umap(struct vhost_blk_req *req)
> +{
> + struct req_page_list *pl;
> + int i, j;
> +
> +
> + if (!req->pl) {
> + kfree(req->bio);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < req->iov_nr; i++) {
> + pl = &req->pl[i];
> + for (j = 0; j < pl->pages_nr; j++) {
> + if (!req->write)
> + set_page_dirty_lock(pl->pages[j]);
> + page_cache_release(pl->pages[j]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + kfree(req->pl);
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_bio_make(struct vhost_blk_req *req,
> + struct block_device *bdev)
> +{
> + int pl_len, page_len, bio_len;
> + int pages_nr_total, i, j, ret;
> + struct iovec *iov = req->iov;
> + int iov_nr = req->iov_nr;
> + struct page **pages, *page;
> + struct bio *bio = NULL;
> + int bio_nr = 0;
> + void *buf;
> +
> + pages_nr_total = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < iov_nr; i++)
> + pages_nr_total += iov_num_pages(&iov[i]);
> +
> + if (unlikely(req->write == WRITE_FLUSH)) {
> + req->pl = NULL;
> + req->bio = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bio *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 1);
> + if (!bio) {
> + kfree(req->bio);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + bio->bi_sector = req->sector;
> + bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
> + bio->bi_private = req;
> + bio->bi_end_io = vhost_blk_req_done;
> + req->bio[bio_nr++] = bio;
> +
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pl_len = iov_nr * sizeof(req->pl[0]);
> + page_len = pages_nr_total * sizeof(struct page *);
> + bio_len = pages_nr_total * sizeof(struct bio *);
> +
> + buf = kmalloc(pl_len + page_len + bio_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + req->pl = buf;
> + pages = buf + pl_len;
> + req->bio = buf + pl_len + page_len;
> +
> + req->iov_nr = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < iov_nr; i++) {
> + int pages_nr = iov_num_pages(&iov[i]);
> + unsigned long iov_base, iov_len;
> + struct req_page_list *pl;
> +
> + iov_base = (unsigned long)iov[i].iov_base;
> + iov_len = (unsigned long)iov[i].iov_len;
> +
> + /* TODO: Limit the total number of pages pinned */
What's the plan here? Is there some limit if e.g. aio is used?
> + ret = get_user_pages_fast(iov_base, pages_nr,
> + !req->write, pages);
> + if (ret != pages_nr)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + req->iov_nr++;
> + pl = &req->pl[i];
> + pl->pages_nr = pages_nr;
> + pl->pages = pages;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < pages_nr; j++) {
> + unsigned int off, len;
> + page = pages[j];
> + off = iov_base & ~PAGE_MASK;
> + len = PAGE_SIZE - off;
> + if (len > iov_len)
> + len = iov_len;
> +
> + while (!bio || bio_add_page(bio, page, len, off) <= 0) {
> + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, pages_nr);
> + if (!bio)
> + goto fail;
> + bio->bi_sector = req->sector;
> + bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
> + bio->bi_private = req;
> + bio->bi_end_io = vhost_blk_req_done;
> + req->bio[bio_nr++] = bio;
> + }
> + req->sector += len >> 9;
> + iov_base += len;
> + iov_len -= len;
> + }
> +
> + pages += pages_nr;
> + }
> +out:
> + atomic_set(&req->bio_nr, bio_nr);
> + return 0;
> +
> +fail:
> + for (i = 0; i < bio_nr; i++)
> + bio_put(req->bio[i]);
> + vhost_blk_req_umap(req);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void vhost_blk_bio_send(struct vhost_blk_req *req)
> +{
> + struct blk_plug plug;
> + int i, bio_nr;
> +
> + bio_nr = atomic_read(&req->bio_nr);
> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
> + for (i = 0; i < bio_nr; i++)
> + submit_bio(req->write, req->bio[i]);
> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_req_submit(struct vhost_blk_req *req, struct file *file)
> +{
> +
> + struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> + struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_bdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vhost_blk_bio_make(req, bdev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + vhost_blk_bio_send(req);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_req_done_thread(void *data)
> +{
> + mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
> + struct vhost_blk *blk = data;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> + struct llist_node *llnode;
> + struct vhost_blk_req *req;
> + bool added;
> + u8 status;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vq = &blk->vq;
> + set_fs(USER_DS);
> + use_mm(blk->dev.mm);
> + for (;;) {
> + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + llnode = llist_del_all(&blk->llhead);
> + if (!llnode) {
> + schedule();
> + if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop()))
> + break;
> + continue;
> + }
> + set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> +
> + if (need_resched())
> + schedule();
> +
> + added = false;
> + while (llnode) {
> + req = llist_entry(llnode, struct vhost_blk_req, llnode);
> + llnode = llist_next(llnode);
> +
> + vhost_blk_req_umap(req);
> +
> + status = req->len > 0 ?
> + VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK : VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
> + ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + continue;
> + vhost_add_used(&blk->vq, req->head, req->len);
> + added = true;
> + }
> + if (likely(added))
> + vhost_signal(&blk->dev, &blk->vq);
> + }
> + unuse_mm(blk->dev.mm);
> + set_fs(oldfs);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_blk_flush(struct vhost_blk *blk)
> +{
> + vhost_poll_flush(&blk->vq.poll);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void vhost_blk_stop(struct vhost_blk *blk, struct file **file)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &blk->vq;
> + struct file *f;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> + f = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> + rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, NULL);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> + *file = f;
> +}
> +
> +/* Handle guest request */
> +static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> + struct virtio_blk_outhdr *hdr,
> + u16 head, u16 out, u16 in,
> + struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct vhost_blk *blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
> + unsigned char id[VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES];
> + struct vhost_blk_req *req;
> + int ret, len;
> + u8 status;
> +
> + req = &blk->reqs[head];
> + req->head = head;
> + req->blk = blk;
> + req->sector = hdr->sector;
> + req->iov = blk->iov;
> +
> + req->len = iov_length(vq->iov, out + in) - sizeof(status);
> + req->iov_nr = move_iovec(vq->iov, req->iov, req->len, out + in);
> +
> + move_iovec(vq->iov, req->status, sizeof(status), out + in);
> +
> + switch (hdr->type) {
> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT:
> + req->write = WRITE;
> + ret = vhost_blk_req_submit(req, file);
> + break;
> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN:
> + req->write = READ;
> + ret = vhost_blk_req_submit(req, file);
> + break;
> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH:
> + req->write = WRITE_FLUSH;
> + ret = vhost_blk_req_submit(req, file);
> + break;
> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID:
> + ret = snprintf(id, VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES,
> + "vhost-blk%d", blk->index);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + break;
> + len = ret;
> + ret = memcpy_toiovecend(req->iov, id, 0, len);
> + status = ret < 0 ? VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR : VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK;
> + ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, len);
> + break;
> + default:
> + vq_err(vq, "Unsupported request type %d\n", hdr->type);
> + status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
> + ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, 0);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Guest kick us for IO request */
> +static void vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> +{
> + struct virtio_blk_outhdr hdr;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
> + int in, out, ret;
> + struct file *f;
> + u16 head;
> +
> + vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue, poll.work);
> + blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
> +
> + /* TODO: check that we are running from vhost_worker? */
> + f = rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1);
> + if (!f)
> + return;
> +
> + vhost_disable_notify(&blk->dev, vq);
> + for (;;) {
> + head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&blk->dev, vq, vq->iov,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
> + &out, &in, NULL, NULL);
> + if (unlikely(head < 0))
> + break;
> +
> + if (unlikely(head == vq->num)) {
> + if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&blk->dev, vq))) {
> + vhost_disable_notify(&blk->dev, vq);
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> + move_iovec(vq->iov, vq->hdr, sizeof(hdr), out);
> + ret = memcpy_fromiovecend((unsigned char *)&hdr, vq->hdr, 0,
> + sizeof(hdr));
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + vq_err(vq, "Failed to get block header!\n");
> + vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (vhost_blk_req_handle(vq, &hdr, head, out, in, f) < 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + blk = kzalloc(sizeof(*blk), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!blk) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ida_simple_get(&vhost_blk_index_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_dev;
> + blk->index = ret;
> +
> + blk->vq.handle_kick = vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick;
> +
> + ret = vhost_dev_init(&blk->dev, &blk->vq, VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_dev;
> + file->private_data = blk;
> +
> + blk->host_kick = kthread_create(vhost_blk_req_done_thread,
> + blk, "vhost-blk-%d", current->pid);
> + if (IS_ERR(blk->host_kick)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(blk->host_kick);
> + goto out_dev;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +out_dev:
> + kfree(blk);
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
> +{
> + struct vhost_blk *blk = f->private_data;
> + struct file *file;
> +
> + ida_simple_remove(&vhost_blk_index_ida, blk->index);
> + vhost_blk_stop(blk, &file);
> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
> + vhost_dev_cleanup(&blk->dev, false);
> + if (file)
> + fput(file);
> + kthread_stop(blk->host_kick);
> + kfree(blk->reqs);
> + kfree(blk);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_set_features(struct vhost_blk *blk, u64 features)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + blk->dev.acked_features = features;
> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long vhost_blk_set_backend(struct vhost_blk *blk, unsigned index, int fd)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &blk->vq;
> + struct file *file, *oldfile;
> + struct inode *inode;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&blk->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_dev;
> +
> + if (index >= VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX) {
> + ret = -ENOBUFS;
> + goto out_dev;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> + if (!vhost_vq_access_ok(vq)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out_vq;
> + }
> +
> + file = fget(fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(file)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(file);
> + goto out_vq;
> + }
> +
> + /* Only raw block device is supported for now */
> + inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> + if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out_file;
> + }
> +
> + oldfile = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> + if (file != oldfile) {
> + rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, file);
> + vhost_blk_enable_vq(blk, vq);
> +
> + ret = vhost_init_used(vq);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_file;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +
> + if (oldfile) {
> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
> + fput(oldfile);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_file:
> + fput(file);
> +out_vq:
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> +out_dev:
> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long vhost_blk_reset_owner(struct vhost_blk *blk)
> +{
> + struct file *file = NULL;
> + int err;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + err = vhost_dev_check_owner(&blk->dev);
> + if (err)
> + goto done;
> + vhost_blk_stop(blk, &file);
> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
> + err = vhost_dev_reset_owner(&blk->dev);
> +done:
> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + if (file)
> + fput(file);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static long vhost_blk_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct vhost_blk *blk = f->private_data;
> + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> + struct vhost_vring_file backend;
> + u64 __user *featurep = argp;
> + u64 features;
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (ioctl) {
> + case VHOST_BLK_SET_BACKEND:
> + if (copy_from_user(&backend, argp, sizeof(backend)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return vhost_blk_set_backend(blk, backend.index, backend.fd);
> + case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
> + features = VHOST_BLK_FEATURES;
> + if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> + case VHOST_SET_FEATURES:
> + if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + if (features & ~VHOST_BLK_FEATURES)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + return vhost_blk_set_features(blk, features);
> + case VHOST_RESET_OWNER:
> + return vhost_blk_reset_owner(blk);
> + default:
> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + ret = vhost_dev_ioctl(&blk->dev, ioctl, arg);
> + if (!ret && ioctl == VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM)
> + ret = vhost_blk_setup(blk);
> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations vhost_blk_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = vhost_blk_open,
> + .release = vhost_blk_release,
> + .llseek = noop_llseek,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = vhost_blk_ioctl,
> +};
> +
> +static struct miscdevice vhost_blk_misc = {
> + MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> + "vhost-blk",
> + &vhost_blk_fops,
> +};
> +
> +static int vhost_blk_init(void)
> +{
> + return misc_register(&vhost_blk_misc);
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_blk_exit(void)
> +{
> + misc_deregister(&vhost_blk_misc);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(vhost_blk_init);
> +module_exit(vhost_blk_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Asias He");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Host kernel accelerator for virtio_blk");
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.h b/drivers/vhost/blk.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2f674f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> +
> +enum {
> + VHOST_BLK_FEATURES = (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX),
> +};
> +/* VHOST_BLK specific defines */
> +#define VHOST_BLK_SET_BACKEND _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x50, struct vhost_vring_file)
> --
> 1.7.11.7
On 11/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:53:42PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>> vhost-blk is an in-kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>>
>> Due to lack of proper in-kernel AIO interface, this version converts
>> guest's I/O request to bio and use submit_bio() to submit I/O directly.
>> So this version any supports raw block device as guest's disk image,
>> e.g. /dev/sda, /dev/ram0. We can add file based image support to
>> vhost-blk once we have in-kernel AIO interface. There are some work in
>> progress for in-kernel AIO interface from Dave Kleikamp and Zach Brown:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133312234313122
>>
>> Performance evaluation:
>> -----------------------------
>> 1) LKVM
>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using kvm tool
>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
>> seq-read 107 121 +13.0%
>> seq-write 130 179 +37.6%
>> rnd-read 102 122 +19.6%
>> rnd-write 125 159 +27.0%
>>
>> 2) QEMU
>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using QEMU
>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
>> seq-read 76 123 +61.8%
>> seq-write 139 173 +24.4%
>> rnd-read 73 120 +64.3%
>> rnd-write 75 156 +108.0%
>
> Could you compare with dataplane qemu as well please?
Well, I will try to collect it.
>
>>
>> Userspace bits:
>> -----------------------------
>> 1) LKVM
>> The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
>> [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
>>
>> 2) QEMU
>> The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
>> [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Do not assume the buffer layout
>> - Fix wakeup race
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
>> - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
>> - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
>> - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
>> - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
>> - Fail un Unsupported request
>> - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
>> - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
>
> Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
> it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
> vhost tree.
>
> Jens, could you ack this and the bio usage in this driver
> please?
>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk | 10 +
>> drivers/vhost/Makefile | 2 +
>> drivers/vhost/blk.c | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/vhost/blk.h | 8 +
>> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>> index 202bba6..acd8038 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>> @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ config VHOST_NET
>>
>> if STAGING
>> source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
>> +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk"
>> endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ff8ab76
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +config VHOST_BLK
>> + tristate "Host kernel accelerator for virtio blk (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>> + depends on BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && m
>> + ---help---
>> + This kernel module can be loaded in host kernel to accelerate
>> + guest block with virtio_blk. Not to be confused with virtio_blk
>> + module itself which needs to be loaded in guest kernel.
>> +
>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
>> + be called vhost_blk.
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Makefile b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>> index a27b053..1a8a4a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET) += vhost_net.o
>> vhost_net-y := vhost.o net.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TCM_VHOST) += tcm_vhost.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_BLK) += vhost_blk.o
>> +vhost_blk-y := blk.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f0f118a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Taobao, Inc.
>> + * Author: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>> + * Author: Asias He <[email protected]>
>> + *
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
>> + *
>> + * virtio-blk server in host kernel.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
>> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/file.h>
>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
>> +#include <linux/llist.h>
>> +
>> +#include "vhost.c"
>> +#include "vhost.h"
>> +#include "blk.h"
>> +
>> +static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_blk_index_ida);
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_REQ = 0,
>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX = 1,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct req_page_list {
>> + struct page **pages;
>> + int pages_nr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct vhost_blk_req {
>> + struct llist_node llnode;
>> + struct req_page_list *pl;
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
>> +
>> + struct iovec *iov;
>> + int iov_nr;
>> +
>> + struct bio **bio;
>> + atomic_t bio_nr;
>> +
>> + struct iovec status[1];
>> +
>> + sector_t sector;
>> + int write;
>> + u16 head;
>> + long len;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct vhost_blk {
>> + struct task_struct *host_kick;
>
> Could you please add a comment here explaining why
> is this better than using the builtin vhost thread?
With separate thread model, the request submit and request completion
can be handled in parallel. I have measured significant performance
improvement with this model. In the long term, It would be nice if the
vhost core can provide multiple thread support.
>> + struct iovec iov[UIO_MAXIOV];
>> + struct vhost_blk_req *reqs;
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue vq;
>> + struct llist_head llhead;
>> + struct vhost_dev dev;
>> + u16 reqs_nr;
>> + int index;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int move_iovec(struct iovec *from, struct iovec *to,
>> + size_t len, int iov_count)
>> +{
>> + int seg = 0;
>> + size_t size;
>> +
>> + while (len && seg < iov_count) {
>> + if (from->iov_len == 0) {
>> + ++from;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + size = min(from->iov_len, len);
>> + to->iov_base = from->iov_base;
>> + to->iov_len = size;
>> + from->iov_len -= size;
>> + from->iov_base += size;
>> + len -= size;
>> + ++from;
>> + ++to;
>> + ++seg;
>> + }
>> + return seg;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int iov_num_pages(struct iovec *iov)
>> +{
>> + return (PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)iov->iov_base + iov->iov_len) -
>> + ((unsigned long)iov->iov_base & PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_setup(struct vhost_blk *blk)
>> +{
>> + blk->reqs_nr = blk->vq.num;
>> +
>> + blk->reqs = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vhost_blk_req) * blk->reqs_nr,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!blk->reqs)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int vhost_blk_set_status(struct vhost_blk_req *req, u8 status)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk = req->blk;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = memcpy_toiovecend(req->status, &status, 0, sizeof(status));
>> +
>> + if (ret) {
>> + vq_err(&blk->vq, "Failed to write status\n");
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vhost_blk_enable_vq(struct vhost_blk *blk,
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> +{
>> + wake_up_process(blk->host_kick);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vhost_blk_req_done(struct bio *bio, int err)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_blk_req *req = bio->bi_private;
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk = req->blk;
>> +
>> + if (err)
>> + req->len = err;
>> +
>> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&req->bio_nr)) {
>> + llist_add(&req->llnode, &blk->llhead);
>> + wake_up_process(blk->host_kick);
>> + }
>> +
>> + bio_put(bio);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vhost_blk_req_umap(struct vhost_blk_req *req)
>> +{
>> + struct req_page_list *pl;
>> + int i, j;
>> +
>> +
>> + if (!req->pl) {
>> + kfree(req->bio);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < req->iov_nr; i++) {
>> + pl = &req->pl[i];
>> + for (j = 0; j < pl->pages_nr; j++) {
>> + if (!req->write)
>> + set_page_dirty_lock(pl->pages[j]);
>> + page_cache_release(pl->pages[j]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(req->pl);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_bio_make(struct vhost_blk_req *req,
>> + struct block_device *bdev)
>> +{
>> + int pl_len, page_len, bio_len;
>> + int pages_nr_total, i, j, ret;
>> + struct iovec *iov = req->iov;
>> + int iov_nr = req->iov_nr;
>> + struct page **pages, *page;
>> + struct bio *bio = NULL;
>> + int bio_nr = 0;
>> + void *buf;
>> +
>> + pages_nr_total = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i < iov_nr; i++)
>> + pages_nr_total += iov_num_pages(&iov[i]);
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(req->write == WRITE_FLUSH)) {
>> + req->pl = NULL;
>> + req->bio = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bio *), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, 1);
>> + if (!bio) {
>> + kfree(req->bio);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + bio->bi_sector = req->sector;
>> + bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
>> + bio->bi_private = req;
>> + bio->bi_end_io = vhost_blk_req_done;
>> + req->bio[bio_nr++] = bio;
>> +
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pl_len = iov_nr * sizeof(req->pl[0]);
>> + page_len = pages_nr_total * sizeof(struct page *);
>> + bio_len = pages_nr_total * sizeof(struct bio *);
>> +
>> + buf = kmalloc(pl_len + page_len + bio_len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!buf)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + req->pl = buf;
>> + pages = buf + pl_len;
>> + req->bio = buf + pl_len + page_len;
>> +
>> + req->iov_nr = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i < iov_nr; i++) {
>> + int pages_nr = iov_num_pages(&iov[i]);
>> + unsigned long iov_base, iov_len;
>> + struct req_page_list *pl;
>> +
>> + iov_base = (unsigned long)iov[i].iov_base;
>> + iov_len = (unsigned long)iov[i].iov_len;
>> +
>> + /* TODO: Limit the total number of pages pinned */
>
> What's the plan here? Is there some limit if e.g. aio is used?
The problem is there is no easy way to find a proper limit number. May
be 16 * vq size number of pages as you sugguested.
With aio, we do not touch this code path at all.
>> + ret = get_user_pages_fast(iov_base, pages_nr,
>> + !req->write, pages);
>> + if (ret != pages_nr)
>> + goto fail;
>> +
>> + req->iov_nr++;
>> + pl = &req->pl[i];
>> + pl->pages_nr = pages_nr;
>> + pl->pages = pages;
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < pages_nr; j++) {
>> + unsigned int off, len;
>> + page = pages[j];
>> + off = iov_base & ~PAGE_MASK;
>> + len = PAGE_SIZE - off;
>> + if (len > iov_len)
>> + len = iov_len;
>> +
>> + while (!bio || bio_add_page(bio, page, len, off) <= 0) {
>> + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, pages_nr);
>> + if (!bio)
>> + goto fail;
>> + bio->bi_sector = req->sector;
>> + bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
>> + bio->bi_private = req;
>> + bio->bi_end_io = vhost_blk_req_done;
>> + req->bio[bio_nr++] = bio;
>> + }
>> + req->sector += len >> 9;
>> + iov_base += len;
>> + iov_len -= len;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pages += pages_nr;
>> + }
>> +out:
>> + atomic_set(&req->bio_nr, bio_nr);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +fail:
>> + for (i = 0; i < bio_nr; i++)
>> + bio_put(req->bio[i]);
>> + vhost_blk_req_umap(req);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void vhost_blk_bio_send(struct vhost_blk_req *req)
>> +{
>> + struct blk_plug plug;
>> + int i, bio_nr;
>> +
>> + bio_nr = atomic_read(&req->bio_nr);
>> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
>> + for (i = 0; i < bio_nr; i++)
>> + submit_bio(req->write, req->bio[i]);
>> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_req_submit(struct vhost_blk_req *req, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> +
>> + struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>> + struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_bdev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = vhost_blk_bio_make(req, bdev);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + vhost_blk_bio_send(req);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_req_done_thread(void *data)
>> +{
>> + mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs();
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk = data;
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>> + struct llist_node *llnode;
>> + struct vhost_blk_req *req;
>> + bool added;
>> + u8 status;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + vq = &blk->vq;
>> + set_fs(USER_DS);
>> + use_mm(blk->dev.mm);
>> + for (;;) {
>> + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>> + llnode = llist_del_all(&blk->llhead);
>> + if (!llnode) {
>> + schedule();
>> + if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop()))
>> + break;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> +
>> + if (need_resched())
>> + schedule();
>> +
>> + added = false;
>> + while (llnode) {
>> + req = llist_entry(llnode, struct vhost_blk_req, llnode);
>> + llnode = llist_next(llnode);
>> +
>> + vhost_blk_req_umap(req);
>> +
>> + status = req->len > 0 ?
>> + VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK : VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
>> + ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>> + continue;
>> + vhost_add_used(&blk->vq, req->head, req->len);
>> + added = true;
>> + }
>> + if (likely(added))
>> + vhost_signal(&blk->dev, &blk->vq);
>> + }
>> + unuse_mm(blk->dev.mm);
>> + set_fs(oldfs);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vhost_blk_flush(struct vhost_blk *blk)
>> +{
>> + vhost_poll_flush(&blk->vq.poll);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void vhost_blk_stop(struct vhost_blk *blk, struct file **file)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &blk->vq;
>> + struct file *f;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
>> + f = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
>> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, NULL);
>> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>> +
>> + *file = f;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle guest request */
>> +static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> + struct virtio_blk_outhdr *hdr,
>> + u16 head, u16 out, u16 in,
>> + struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
>> + unsigned char id[VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES];
>> + struct vhost_blk_req *req;
>> + int ret, len;
>> + u8 status;
>> +
>> + req = &blk->reqs[head];
>> + req->head = head;
>> + req->blk = blk;
>> + req->sector = hdr->sector;
>> + req->iov = blk->iov;
>> +
>> + req->len = iov_length(vq->iov, out + in) - sizeof(status);
>> + req->iov_nr = move_iovec(vq->iov, req->iov, req->len, out + in);
>> +
>> + move_iovec(vq->iov, req->status, sizeof(status), out + in);
>> +
>> + switch (hdr->type) {
>> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT:
>> + req->write = WRITE;
>> + ret = vhost_blk_req_submit(req, file);
>> + break;
>> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN:
>> + req->write = READ;
>> + ret = vhost_blk_req_submit(req, file);
>> + break;
>> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_FLUSH:
>> + req->write = WRITE_FLUSH;
>> + ret = vhost_blk_req_submit(req, file);
>> + break;
>> + case VIRTIO_BLK_T_GET_ID:
>> + ret = snprintf(id, VIRTIO_BLK_ID_BYTES,
>> + "vhost-blk%d", blk->index);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + break;
>> + len = ret;
>> + ret = memcpy_toiovecend(req->iov, id, 0, len);
>> + status = ret < 0 ? VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR : VIRTIO_BLK_S_OK;
>> + ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
>> + if (ret)
>> + break;
>> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, len);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + vq_err(vq, "Unsupported request type %d\n", hdr->type);
>> + status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
>> + ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
>> + if (ret)
>> + break;
>> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Guest kick us for IO request */
>> +static void vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_blk_outhdr hdr;
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
>> + int in, out, ret;
>> + struct file *f;
>> + u16 head;
>> +
>> + vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue, poll.work);
>> + blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
>> +
>> + /* TODO: check that we are running from vhost_worker? */
>> + f = rcu_dereference_check(vq->private_data, 1);
>> + if (!f)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + vhost_disable_notify(&blk->dev, vq);
>> + for (;;) {
>> + head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&blk->dev, vq, vq->iov,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
>> + &out, &in, NULL, NULL);
>> + if (unlikely(head < 0))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(head == vq->num)) {
>> + if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&blk->dev, vq))) {
>> + vhost_disable_notify(&blk->dev, vq);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + move_iovec(vq->iov, vq->hdr, sizeof(hdr), out);
>> + ret = memcpy_fromiovecend((unsigned char *)&hdr, vq->hdr, 0,
>> + sizeof(hdr));
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + vq_err(vq, "Failed to get block header!\n");
>> + vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (vhost_blk_req_handle(vq, &hdr, head, out, in, f) < 0)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + blk = kzalloc(sizeof(*blk), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!blk) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = ida_simple_get(&vhost_blk_index_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out_dev;
>> + blk->index = ret;
>> +
>> + blk->vq.handle_kick = vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick;
>> +
>> + ret = vhost_dev_init(&blk->dev, &blk->vq, VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out_dev;
>> + file->private_data = blk;
>> +
>> + blk->host_kick = kthread_create(vhost_blk_req_done_thread,
>> + blk, "vhost-blk-%d", current->pid);
>> + if (IS_ERR(blk->host_kick)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(blk->host_kick);
>> + goto out_dev;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +out_dev:
>> + kfree(blk);
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk = f->private_data;
>> + struct file *file;
>> +
>> + ida_simple_remove(&vhost_blk_index_ida, blk->index);
>> + vhost_blk_stop(blk, &file);
>> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
>> + vhost_dev_cleanup(&blk->dev, false);
>> + if (file)
>> + fput(file);
>> + kthread_stop(blk->host_kick);
>> + kfree(blk->reqs);
>> + kfree(blk);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_set_features(struct vhost_blk *blk, u64 features)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + blk->dev.acked_features = features;
>> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
>> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long vhost_blk_set_backend(struct vhost_blk *blk, unsigned index, int fd)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &blk->vq;
>> + struct file *file, *oldfile;
>> + struct inode *inode;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&blk->dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out_dev;
>> +
>> + if (index >= VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX) {
>> + ret = -ENOBUFS;
>> + goto out_dev;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
>> +
>> + if (!vhost_vq_access_ok(vq)) {
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + goto out_vq;
>> + }
>> +
>> + file = fget(fd);
>> + if (IS_ERR(file)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(file);
>> + goto out_vq;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Only raw block device is supported for now */
>> + inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>> + if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>> + goto out_file;
>> + }
>> +
>> + oldfile = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
>> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
>> + if (file != oldfile) {
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, file);
>> + vhost_blk_enable_vq(blk, vq);
>> +
>> + ret = vhost_init_used(vq);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out_file;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>> +
>> + if (oldfile) {
>> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
>> + fput(oldfile);
>> + }
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +out_file:
>> + fput(file);
>> +out_vq:
>> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>> +out_dev:
>> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long vhost_blk_reset_owner(struct vhost_blk *blk)
>> +{
>> + struct file *file = NULL;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + err = vhost_dev_check_owner(&blk->dev);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto done;
>> + vhost_blk_stop(blk, &file);
>> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
>> + err = vhost_dev_reset_owner(&blk->dev);
>> +done:
>> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + if (file)
>> + fput(file);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static long vhost_blk_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
>> + unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_blk *blk = f->private_data;
>> + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
>> + struct vhost_vring_file backend;
>> + u64 __user *featurep = argp;
>> + u64 features;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + switch (ioctl) {
>> + case VHOST_BLK_SET_BACKEND:
>> + if (copy_from_user(&backend, argp, sizeof(backend)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + return vhost_blk_set_backend(blk, backend.index, backend.fd);
>> + case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
>> + features = VHOST_BLK_FEATURES;
>> + if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + return 0;
>> + case VHOST_SET_FEATURES:
>> + if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + if (features & ~VHOST_BLK_FEATURES)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + return vhost_blk_set_features(blk, features);
>> + case VHOST_RESET_OWNER:
>> + return vhost_blk_reset_owner(blk);
>> + default:
>> + mutex_lock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + ret = vhost_dev_ioctl(&blk->dev, ioctl, arg);
>> + if (!ret && ioctl == VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM)
>> + ret = vhost_blk_setup(blk);
>> + vhost_blk_flush(blk);
>> + mutex_unlock(&blk->dev.mutex);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct file_operations vhost_blk_fops = {
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .open = vhost_blk_open,
>> + .release = vhost_blk_release,
>> + .llseek = noop_llseek,
>> + .unlocked_ioctl = vhost_blk_ioctl,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct miscdevice vhost_blk_misc = {
>> + MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
>> + "vhost-blk",
>> + &vhost_blk_fops,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int vhost_blk_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return misc_register(&vhost_blk_misc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vhost_blk_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + misc_deregister(&vhost_blk_misc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(vhost_blk_init);
>> +module_exit(vhost_blk_exit);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Asias He");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Host kernel accelerator for virtio_blk");
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.h b/drivers/vhost/blk.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..2f674f0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
>> +
>> +enum {
>> + VHOST_BLK_FEATURES = (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX),
>> +};
>> +/* VHOST_BLK specific defines */
>> +#define VHOST_BLK_SET_BACKEND _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x50, struct vhost_vring_file)
>> --
>> 1.7.11.7
--
Asias
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:39:40PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:53:42PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> >> vhost-blk is an in-kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
> >>
> >> Due to lack of proper in-kernel AIO interface, this version converts
> >> guest's I/O request to bio and use submit_bio() to submit I/O directly.
> >> So this version any supports raw block device as guest's disk image,
> >> e.g. /dev/sda, /dev/ram0. We can add file based image support to
> >> vhost-blk once we have in-kernel AIO interface. There are some work in
> >> progress for in-kernel AIO interface from Dave Kleikamp and Zach Brown:
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133312234313122
> >>
> >> Performance evaluation:
> >> -----------------------------
> >> 1) LKVM
> >> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using kvm tool
> >> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
> >> seq-read 107 121 +13.0%
> >> seq-write 130 179 +37.6%
> >> rnd-read 102 122 +19.6%
> >> rnd-write 125 159 +27.0%
> >>
> >> 2) QEMU
> >> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using QEMU
> >> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
> >> seq-read 76 123 +61.8%
> >> seq-write 139 173 +24.4%
> >> rnd-read 73 120 +64.3%
> >> rnd-write 75 156 +108.0%
> >
> > Could you compare with dataplane qemu as well please?
>
>
> Well, I will try to collect it.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Userspace bits:
> >> -----------------------------
> >> 1) LKVM
> >> The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
> >> [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
> >>
> >> 2) QEMU
> >> The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
> >> [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
> >>
> >> Changes in v5:
> >> - Do not assume the buffer layout
> >> - Fix wakeup race
> >>
> >> Changes in v4:
> >> - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
> >> - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
> >> - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
> >> - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
> >> - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
> >> - Fail un Unsupported request
> >> - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
> >> - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
> >
> > Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
> > it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
> > vhost tree.
> >
> > Jens, could you ack this and the bio usage in this driver
> > please?
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk | 10 +
> >> drivers/vhost/Makefile | 2 +
> >> drivers/vhost/blk.c | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/vhost/blk.h | 8 +
> >> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.c
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> >> index 202bba6..acd8038 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> >> @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ config VHOST_NET
> >>
> >> if STAGING
> >> source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
> >> +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk"
> >> endif
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..ff8ab76
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> >> +config VHOST_BLK
> >> + tristate "Host kernel accelerator for virtio blk (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> >> + depends on BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && m
> >> + ---help---
> >> + This kernel module can be loaded in host kernel to accelerate
> >> + guest block with virtio_blk. Not to be confused with virtio_blk
> >> + module itself which needs to be loaded in guest kernel.
> >> +
> >> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> >> + be called vhost_blk.
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Makefile b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> >> index a27b053..1a8a4a5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> >> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET) += vhost_net.o
> >> vhost_net-y := vhost.o net.o
> >>
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_TCM_VHOST) += tcm_vhost.o
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_BLK) += vhost_blk.o
> >> +vhost_blk-y := blk.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..f0f118a
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Taobao, Inc.
> >> + * Author: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
> >> + * Author: Asias He <[email protected]>
> >> + *
> >> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> >> + *
> >> + * virtio-blk server in host kernel.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> >> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
> >> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> >> +#include <linux/file.h>
> >> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> >> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
> >> +#include <linux/llist.h>
> >> +
> >> +#include "vhost.c"
> >> +#include "vhost.h"
> >> +#include "blk.h"
> >> +
> >> +static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_blk_index_ida);
> >> +
> >> +enum {
> >> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_REQ = 0,
> >> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX = 1,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct req_page_list {
> >> + struct page **pages;
> >> + int pages_nr;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct vhost_blk_req {
> >> + struct llist_node llnode;
> >> + struct req_page_list *pl;
> >> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
> >> +
> >> + struct iovec *iov;
> >> + int iov_nr;
> >> +
> >> + struct bio **bio;
> >> + atomic_t bio_nr;
> >> +
> >> + struct iovec status[1];
> >> +
> >> + sector_t sector;
> >> + int write;
> >> + u16 head;
> >> + long len;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct vhost_blk {
> >> + struct task_struct *host_kick;
> >
> > Could you please add a comment here explaining why
> > is this better than using the builtin vhost thread?
>
> With separate thread model, the request submit and request completion
> can be handled in parallel. I have measured significant performance
> improvement with this model.
> In the long term, It would be nice if the
> vhost core can provide multiple thread support.
Strange, all completion does it write out the used ring.
I am guessing you didn't complete requests
in a timely manner which was what caused the issue.
OTOH I'm not sure how increasing the number of threads
scales with # of VMs. Increased scheduler pressure is
also a concern.
Did you try checking completion after each
submitted request to address this?
On 11/20/2012 09:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:39:40PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:53:42PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>>>> vhost-blk is an in-kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>>>>
>>>> Due to lack of proper in-kernel AIO interface, this version converts
>>>> guest's I/O request to bio and use submit_bio() to submit I/O directly.
>>>> So this version any supports raw block device as guest's disk image,
>>>> e.g. /dev/sda, /dev/ram0. We can add file based image support to
>>>> vhost-blk once we have in-kernel AIO interface. There are some work in
>>>> progress for in-kernel AIO interface from Dave Kleikamp and Zach Brown:
>>>>
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133312234313122
>>>>
>>>> Performance evaluation:
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>> 1) LKVM
>>>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using kvm tool
>>>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
>>>> seq-read 107 121 +13.0%
>>>> seq-write 130 179 +37.6%
>>>> rnd-read 102 122 +19.6%
>>>> rnd-write 125 159 +27.0%
>>>>
>>>> 2) QEMU
>>>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using QEMU
>>>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
>>>> seq-read 76 123 +61.8%
>>>> seq-write 139 173 +24.4%
>>>> rnd-read 73 120 +64.3%
>>>> rnd-write 75 156 +108.0%
>>>
>>> Could you compare with dataplane qemu as well please?
>>
>>
>> Well, I will try to collect it.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Userspace bits:
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>> 1) LKVM
>>>> The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
>>>> [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
>>>>
>>>> 2) QEMU
>>>> The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
>>>> [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>> - Do not assume the buffer layout
>>>> - Fix wakeup race
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
>>>> - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
>>>> - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
>>>> - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
>>>> - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
>>>> - Fail un Unsupported request
>>>> - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
>>>> - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
>>> it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
>>> vhost tree.
>>>
>>> Jens, could you ack this and the bio usage in this driver
>>> please?
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk | 10 +
>>>> drivers/vhost/Makefile | 2 +
>>>> drivers/vhost/blk.c | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/vhost/blk.h | 8 +
>>>> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.c
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>>>> index 202bba6..acd8038 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ config VHOST_NET
>>>>
>>>> if STAGING
>>>> source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
>>>> +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk"
>>>> endif
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..ff8ab76
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>>> +config VHOST_BLK
>>>> + tristate "Host kernel accelerator for virtio blk (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>>>> + depends on BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && m
>>>> + ---help---
>>>> + This kernel module can be loaded in host kernel to accelerate
>>>> + guest block with virtio_blk. Not to be confused with virtio_blk
>>>> + module itself which needs to be loaded in guest kernel.
>>>> +
>>>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
>>>> + be called vhost_blk.
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Makefile b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>>>> index a27b053..1a8a4a5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>>>> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET) += vhost_net.o
>>>> vhost_net-y := vhost.o net.o
>>>>
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TCM_VHOST) += tcm_vhost.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_BLK) += vhost_blk.o
>>>> +vhost_blk-y := blk.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..f0f118a
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Taobao, Inc.
>>>> + * Author: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> + * Author: Asias He <[email protected]>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * virtio-blk server in host kernel.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/file.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/llist.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "vhost.c"
>>>> +#include "vhost.h"
>>>> +#include "blk.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_blk_index_ida);
>>>> +
>>>> +enum {
>>>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_REQ = 0,
>>>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX = 1,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct req_page_list {
>>>> + struct page **pages;
>>>> + int pages_nr;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct vhost_blk_req {
>>>> + struct llist_node llnode;
>>>> + struct req_page_list *pl;
>>>> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct iovec *iov;
>>>> + int iov_nr;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct bio **bio;
>>>> + atomic_t bio_nr;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct iovec status[1];
>>>> +
>>>> + sector_t sector;
>>>> + int write;
>>>> + u16 head;
>>>> + long len;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct vhost_blk {
>>>> + struct task_struct *host_kick;
>>>
>>> Could you please add a comment here explaining why
>>> is this better than using the builtin vhost thread?
>>
>> With separate thread model, the request submit and request completion
>> can be handled in parallel. I have measured significant performance
>> improvement with this model.
>> In the long term, It would be nice if the
>> vhost core can provide multiple thread support.
>
> Strange, all completion does it write out the used ring.
> I am guessing you didn't complete requests
> in a timely manner which was what caused the issue.
Previously, there was two 'struct vhost_work' work which poll on the
guest kick eventfd and host aio eventfd. The vhost thread is handling
the works when there are data in eventfd, either guest kick or aio
completion.
> OTOH I'm not sure how increasing the number of threads
> scales with # of VMs. Increased scheduler pressure is
> also a concern.
Agree, this is also my concern. However, this is a trade-off. we have a
price to pay for the parallelism. Also, one thread per vhost device
might not scale with # of VMs too, compared to e.g. per cpu thread.
> Did you try checking completion after each
> submitted request to address this?
Isn't this a sync operation? We can not only account on the checking the
completion in the submit path. Another polling on the completion is
needed anyway. Mixing the completion in submit path, 1) makes the submit
delay longer 2) does not help with the case where a single request takes
relatively long time to finish. IMHO, I do not think mixing the submit
and completion is a good idea.
--
Asias
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:24:55PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 09:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:39:40PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:53:42PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> >>>> vhost-blk is an in-kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
> >>>>
> >>>> Due to lack of proper in-kernel AIO interface, this version converts
> >>>> guest's I/O request to bio and use submit_bio() to submit I/O directly.
> >>>> So this version any supports raw block device as guest's disk image,
> >>>> e.g. /dev/sda, /dev/ram0. We can add file based image support to
> >>>> vhost-blk once we have in-kernel AIO interface. There are some work in
> >>>> progress for in-kernel AIO interface from Dave Kleikamp and Zach Brown:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133312234313122
> >>>>
> >>>> Performance evaluation:
> >>>> -----------------------------
> >>>> 1) LKVM
> >>>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using kvm tool
> >>>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
> >>>> seq-read 107 121 +13.0%
> >>>> seq-write 130 179 +37.6%
> >>>> rnd-read 102 122 +19.6%
> >>>> rnd-write 125 159 +27.0%
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) QEMU
> >>>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using QEMU
> >>>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
> >>>> seq-read 76 123 +61.8%
> >>>> seq-write 139 173 +24.4%
> >>>> rnd-read 73 120 +64.3%
> >>>> rnd-write 75 156 +108.0%
> >>>
> >>> Could you compare with dataplane qemu as well please?
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, I will try to collect it.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Userspace bits:
> >>>> -----------------------------
> >>>> 1) LKVM
> >>>> The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
> >>>> [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) QEMU
> >>>> The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
> >>>> [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v5:
> >>>> - Do not assume the buffer layout
> >>>> - Fix wakeup race
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v4:
> >>>> - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
> >>>> - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
> >>>> - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
> >>>> - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
> >>>> - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
> >>>> - Fail un Unsupported request
> >>>> - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes in v3:
> >>>> - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
> >>>> - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
> >>> it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
> >>> vhost tree.
> >>>
> >>> Jens, could you ack this and the bio usage in this driver
> >>> please?
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
> >>>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk | 10 +
> >>>> drivers/vhost/Makefile | 2 +
> >>>> drivers/vhost/blk.c | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> drivers/vhost/blk.h | 8 +
> >>>> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+)
> >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.c
> >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.h
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> >>>> index 202bba6..acd8038 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
> >>>> @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ config VHOST_NET
> >>>>
> >>>> if STAGING
> >>>> source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
> >>>> +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk"
> >>>> endif
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 0000000..ff8ab76
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> >>>> +config VHOST_BLK
> >>>> + tristate "Host kernel accelerator for virtio blk (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> >>>> + depends on BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && m
> >>>> + ---help---
> >>>> + This kernel module can be loaded in host kernel to accelerate
> >>>> + guest block with virtio_blk. Not to be confused with virtio_blk
> >>>> + module itself which needs to be loaded in guest kernel.
> >>>> +
> >>>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> >>>> + be called vhost_blk.
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Makefile b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> >>>> index a27b053..1a8a4a5 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET) += vhost_net.o
> >>>> vhost_net-y := vhost.o net.o
> >>>>
> >>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TCM_VHOST) += tcm_vhost.o
> >>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_BLK) += vhost_blk.o
> >>>> +vhost_blk-y := blk.o
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 0000000..f0f118a
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Taobao, Inc.
> >>>> + * Author: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>> + * Author: Asias He <[email protected]>
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * virtio-blk server in host kernel.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/file.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/llist.h>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#include "vhost.c"
> >>>> +#include "vhost.h"
> >>>> +#include "blk.h"
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_blk_index_ida);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +enum {
> >>>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_REQ = 0,
> >>>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX = 1,
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +struct req_page_list {
> >>>> + struct page **pages;
> >>>> + int pages_nr;
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +struct vhost_blk_req {
> >>>> + struct llist_node llnode;
> >>>> + struct req_page_list *pl;
> >>>> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + struct iovec *iov;
> >>>> + int iov_nr;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + struct bio **bio;
> >>>> + atomic_t bio_nr;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + struct iovec status[1];
> >>>> +
> >>>> + sector_t sector;
> >>>> + int write;
> >>>> + u16 head;
> >>>> + long len;
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +struct vhost_blk {
> >>>> + struct task_struct *host_kick;
> >>>
> >>> Could you please add a comment here explaining why
> >>> is this better than using the builtin vhost thread?
> >>
> >> With separate thread model, the request submit and request completion
> >> can be handled in parallel. I have measured significant performance
> >> improvement with this model.
> >> In the long term, It would be nice if the
> >> vhost core can provide multiple thread support.
> >
> > Strange, all completion does it write out the used ring.
> > I am guessing you didn't complete requests
> > in a timely manner which was what caused the issue.
>
> Previously, there was two 'struct vhost_work' work which poll on the
> guest kick eventfd and host aio eventfd. The vhost thread is handling
> the works when there are data in eventfd, either guest kick or aio
> completion.
See VHOST_NET_WEIGHT in how in -net we prevent starvation
between tx and rx.
> > OTOH I'm not sure how increasing the number of threads
> > scales with # of VMs. Increased scheduler pressure is
> > also a concern.
>
> Agree, this is also my concern. However, this is a trade-off. we have a
> price to pay for the parallelism.
If the work offloaded is trivial in size then the gain is likely
to be marginal.
> Also, one thread per vhost device
> might not scale with # of VMs too, compared to e.g. per cpu thread.
I'e no idea how to do QoS with a per cpu thread otherwise
> > Did you try checking completion after each
> > submitted request to address this?
>
> Isn't this a sync operation? We can not only account on the checking the
> completion in the submit path. Another polling on the completion is
> needed anyway. Mixing the completion in submit path, 1) makes the submit
> delay longer 2) does not help with the case where a single request takes
> relatively long time to finish. IMHO, I do not think mixing the submit
> and completion is a good idea.
To clarify, you would
1. do llist_del_all in handle_kick -
the delay this adds should be trivial
2. for completion queue work on vhost thread -
this can be as simple as waking up the regular
kick handler
You can further reduce overhead by batching
the wakeups in 2. See my patch
vhost-net: reduce vq polling on tx zerocopy
that does this for -net.
> --
> Asias
On 11/21/2012 07:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:24:55PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 09:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:39:40PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>>>> On 11/20/2012 04:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:53:42PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>>>>>> vhost-blk is an in-kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Due to lack of proper in-kernel AIO interface, this version converts
>>>>>> guest's I/O request to bio and use submit_bio() to submit I/O directly.
>>>>>> So this version any supports raw block device as guest's disk image,
>>>>>> e.g. /dev/sda, /dev/ram0. We can add file based image support to
>>>>>> vhost-blk once we have in-kernel AIO interface. There are some work in
>>>>>> progress for in-kernel AIO interface from Dave Kleikamp and Zach Brown:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=133312234313122
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Performance evaluation:
>>>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>>> 1) LKVM
>>>>>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using kvm tool
>>>>>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
>>>>>> seq-read 107 121 +13.0%
>>>>>> seq-write 130 179 +37.6%
>>>>>> rnd-read 102 122 +19.6%
>>>>>> rnd-write 125 159 +27.0%
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) QEMU
>>>>>> Fio with libaio ioengine on Fusion IO device using QEMU
>>>>>> IOPS(k) Before After Improvement
>>>>>> seq-read 76 123 +61.8%
>>>>>> seq-write 139 173 +24.4%
>>>>>> rnd-read 73 120 +64.3%
>>>>>> rnd-write 75 156 +108.0%
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you compare with dataplane qemu as well please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, I will try to collect it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Userspace bits:
>>>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>>> 1) LKVM
>>>>>> The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
>>>>>> [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) QEMU
>>>>>> The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
>>>>>> [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>>>> - Do not assume the buffer layout
>>>>>> - Fix wakeup race
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>>> - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
>>>>>> - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
>>>>>> - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
>>>>>> - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
>>>>>> - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
>>>>>> - Fail un Unsupported request
>>>>>> - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>>> - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
>>>>>> - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
>>>>> it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
>>>>> vhost tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jens, could you ack this and the bio usage in this driver
>>>>> please?
>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk | 10 +
>>>>>> drivers/vhost/Makefile | 2 +
>>>>>> drivers/vhost/blk.c | 697 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> drivers/vhost/blk.h | 8 +
>>>>>> 5 files changed, 718 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.c
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/blk.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>>>>>> index 202bba6..acd8038 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ config VHOST_NET
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if STAGING
>>>>>> source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.tcm"
>>>>>> +source "drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk"
>>>>>> endif
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..ff8ab76
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Kconfig.blk
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>>>>> +config VHOST_BLK
>>>>>> + tristate "Host kernel accelerator for virtio blk (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>>>>>> + depends on BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && m
>>>>>> + ---help---
>>>>>> + This kernel module can be loaded in host kernel to accelerate
>>>>>> + guest block with virtio_blk. Not to be confused with virtio_blk
>>>>>> + module itself which needs to be loaded in guest kernel.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
>>>>>> + be called vhost_blk.
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/Makefile b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>>>>>> index a27b053..1a8a4a5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/Makefile
>>>>>> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_NET) += vhost_net.o
>>>>>> vhost_net-y := vhost.o net.o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TCM_VHOST) += tcm_vhost.o
>>>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VHOST_BLK) += vhost_blk.o
>>>>>> +vhost_blk-y := blk.o
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..f0f118a
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Taobao, Inc.
>>>>>> + * Author: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>> + * Author: Asias He <[email protected]>
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * virtio-blk server in host kernel.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/file.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/llist.h>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#include "vhost.c"
>>>>>> +#include "vhost.h"
>>>>>> +#include "blk.h"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_blk_index_ida);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +enum {
>>>>>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_REQ = 0,
>>>>>> + VHOST_BLK_VQ_MAX = 1,
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +struct req_page_list {
>>>>>> + struct page **pages;
>>>>>> + int pages_nr;
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +struct vhost_blk_req {
>>>>>> + struct llist_node llnode;
>>>>>> + struct req_page_list *pl;
>>>>>> + struct vhost_blk *blk;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + struct iovec *iov;
>>>>>> + int iov_nr;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + struct bio **bio;
>>>>>> + atomic_t bio_nr;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + struct iovec status[1];
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + sector_t sector;
>>>>>> + int write;
>>>>>> + u16 head;
>>>>>> + long len;
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +struct vhost_blk {
>>>>>> + struct task_struct *host_kick;
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please add a comment here explaining why
>>>>> is this better than using the builtin vhost thread?
>>>>
>>>> With separate thread model, the request submit and request completion
>>>> can be handled in parallel. I have measured significant performance
>>>> improvement with this model.
>>>> In the long term, It would be nice if the
>>>> vhost core can provide multiple thread support.
>>>
>>> Strange, all completion does it write out the used ring.
>>> I am guessing you didn't complete requests
>>> in a timely manner which was what caused the issue.
>>
>> Previously, there was two 'struct vhost_work' work which poll on the
>> guest kick eventfd and host aio eventfd. The vhost thread is handling
>> the works when there are data in eventfd, either guest kick or aio
>> completion.
>
> See VHOST_NET_WEIGHT in how in -net we prevent starvation
> between tx and rx.
Looks interesting.
>>> OTOH I'm not sure how increasing the number of threads
>>> scales with # of VMs. Increased scheduler pressure is
>>> also a concern.
>>
>> Agree, this is also my concern. However, this is a trade-off. we have a
>> price to pay for the parallelism.
>
> If the work offloaded is trivial in size then the gain is likely
> to be marginal.
>
>> Also, one thread per vhost device
>> might not scale with # of VMs too, compared to e.g. per cpu thread.
>
> I'e no idea how to do QoS with a per cpu thread otherwise
>
>>> Did you try checking completion after each
>>> submitted request to address this?
>>
>> Isn't this a sync operation? We can not only account on the checking the
>> completion in the submit path. Another polling on the completion is
>> needed anyway. Mixing the completion in submit path, 1) makes the submit
>> delay longer 2) does not help with the case where a single request takes
>> relatively long time to finish. IMHO, I do not think mixing the submit
>> and completion is a good idea.
>
> To clarify, you would
> 1. do llist_del_all in handle_kick -
> the delay this adds should be trivial
> 2. for completion queue work on vhost thread -
> this can be as simple as waking up the regular
> kick handler
I am trying the one thread model. If it works fine, I will switch to it
in v6.
> You can further reduce overhead by batching
> the wakeups in 2. See my patch
> vhost-net: reduce vq polling on tx zerocopy
> that does this for -net.
okay. thanks!
--
Asias
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > Userspace bits:
> > -----------------------------
> > 1) LKVM
> > The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
> > [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
> >
> > 2) QEMU
> > The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
> > [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Do not assume the buffer layout
> > - Fix wakeup race
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
> > - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
> > - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
> > - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
> > - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
> > - Fail un Unsupported request
> > - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
> > - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
>
> Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
> it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
> vhost tree.
Hi Dave, are you ok with this proposal?
--
MST
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:14:16 +0200
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >
>> > Userspace bits:
>> > -----------------------------
>> > 1) LKVM
>> > The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
>> > [email protected]:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
>> >
>> > 2) QEMU
>> > The latest vhost-blk userspace prototype for QEMU can be found here:
>> > [email protected]:asias/qemu.git blk.vhost-blk
>> >
>> > Changes in v5:
>> > - Do not assume the buffer layout
>> > - Fix wakeup race
>> >
>> > Changes in v4:
>> > - Mark req->status as userspace pointer
>> > - Use __copy_to_user() instead of copy_to_user() in vhost_blk_set_status()
>> > - Add if (need_resched()) schedule() in blk thread
>> > - Kill vhost_blk_stop_vq() and move it into vhost_blk_stop()
>> > - Use vq_err() instead of pr_warn()
>> > - Fail un Unsupported request
>> > - Add flush in vhost_blk_set_features()
>> >
>> > Changes in v3:
>> > - Sending REQ_FLUSH bio instead of vfs_fsync, thanks Christoph!
>> > - Check file passed by user is a raw block device file
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Asias He <[email protected]>
>>
>> Since there are files shared by this and vhost net
>> it's easiest for me to merge this all through the
>> vhost tree.
>
> Hi Dave, are you ok with this proposal?
I have no problems with this, for networking parts:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>