On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2013 07:43 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
> On 26/02/13 13:58, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 26 February 2013 06:51 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
>
> this patch depenfs on [PATCH] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by
> multiple drivers
>
> Palmas charger has 16 GPIOs
> add palmas_gpio_[read|write|update] api to take account
> second bank of GPIOs
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <[email protected]>
Is something happening in this series?
I'm ignoring it for now since the last activity in the thread was
some concerns from Laxman.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On 22/03/13 07:55, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 26 February 2013 07:43 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
>> On 26/02/13 13:58, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 26 February 2013 06:51 PM, Ian Lartey wrote:
>>
>> this patch depenfs on [PATCH] mfd: palmas: is_palmas_charger needed by
>> multiple drivers
>>
>> Palmas charger has 16 GPIOs
>> add palmas_gpio_[read|write|update] api to take account
>> second bank of GPIOs
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Lartey <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <[email protected]>
>
> Is something happening in this series?
>
> I'm ignoring it for now since the last activity in the thread was
> some concerns from Laxman.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Yes there's going to be an patch series update [v9] posted today.
Ian