2013-05-14 22:30:38

by Sam Bradshaw

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mtip32xx: Correctly handle bio->bi_idx != 0 conditions


Stacking drivers may append bvecs to existing bio's, resulting
in non-zero bi_idx conditions. This patch counts the loops of
bio_for_each_segment() rather than inheriting the bi_idx value
to pass as a segment count to the hardware submission routine.

Signed-off-by: Sam Bradshaw <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
b/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
index 847107e..7c77ae1 100644
--- a/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
+++ b/drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c
@@ -3863,7 +3863,7 @@ static void mtip_make_request(struct request_queue
*queue, struct bio *bio)
struct driver_data *dd = queue->queuedata;
struct scatterlist *sg;
struct bio_vec *bvec;
- int nents = 0;
+ int i, nents = 0;
int tag = 0, unaligned = 0;

if (unlikely(dd->dd_flag & MTIP_DDF_STOP_IO)) {
@@ -3921,11 +3921,12 @@ static void mtip_make_request(struct
request_queue *queue, struct bio *bio)
}

/* Create the scatter list for this bio. */
- bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, nents) {
+ bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, i) {
sg_set_page(&sg[nents],
bvec->bv_page,
bvec->bv_len,
bvec->bv_offset);
+ nents++;
}

/* Issue the read/write. */


2013-05-15 08:10:27

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtip32xx: Correctly handle bio->bi_idx != 0 conditions

On Tue, May 14 2013, Sam Bradshaw wrote:
>
> Stacking drivers may append bvecs to existing bio's, resulting
> in non-zero bi_idx conditions. This patch counts the loops of
> bio_for_each_segment() rather than inheriting the bi_idx value
> to pass as a segment count to the hardware submission routine.

Yup, that's a plain bug. Iteration always starts at current index and
forward, so nents wont necessarily start at 0. Applied.

--
Jens Axboe