at91sam9n12 has Full-speed only USB. So we should add
it to the list in at91_pllb_usbfs_clock_init() function.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
index 978de42..2f732d9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void __init at91_pllb_usbfs_clock_init(unsigned long main_clock)
at91_pmc_write(AT91_PMC_SCER, AT91RM9200_PMC_MCKUDP);
} else if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9261() ||
cpu_is_at91sam9263() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20() ||
- cpu_is_at91sam9g10()) {
+ cpu_is_at91sam9g10() || cpu_is_at91sam9n12()) {
uhpck.pmc_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP;
udpck.pmc_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP;
}
--
1.8.2.2
Hi Nicolas,
On 06/24/2013 06:57 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> at91sam9n12 has Full-speed only USB. So we should add
> it to the list in at91_pllb_usbfs_clock_init() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> index 978de42..2f732d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void __init at91_pllb_usbfs_clock_init(unsigned long main_clock)
> at91_pmc_write(AT91_PMC_SCER, AT91RM9200_PMC_MCKUDP);
> } else if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9261() ||
> cpu_is_at91sam9263() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20() ||
> - cpu_is_at91sam9g10()) {
> + cpu_is_at91sam9g10() || cpu_is_at91sam9n12()) {
> uhpck.pmc_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP;
> udpck.pmc_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP;
> }
>
As you post the following patches:
ARM: at91/PMC: fix at91sam9n12 USB FS init
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2772301/)
This patch no need anymore.
Best Regards,
Bo Shen
On 25/06/2013 07:10, Bo Shen :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On 06/24/2013 06:57 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> at91sam9n12 has Full-speed only USB. So we should add
>> it to the list in at91_pllb_usbfs_clock_init() function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
>> index 978de42..2f732d9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
>> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void __init
>> at91_pllb_usbfs_clock_init(unsigned long main_clock)
>> at91_pmc_write(AT91_PMC_SCER, AT91RM9200_PMC_MCKUDP);
>> } else if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9261() ||
>> cpu_is_at91sam9263() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20() ||
>> - cpu_is_at91sam9g10()) {
>> + cpu_is_at91sam9g10() || cpu_is_at91sam9n12()) {
>> uhpck.pmc_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP;
>> udpck.pmc_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP;
>> }
>>
>
> As you post the following patches:
> ARM: at91/PMC: fix at91sam9n12 USB FS init
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2772301/)
>
> This patch no need anymore.
Absolutely.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre