2013-06-29 09:11:44

by Jiaxing Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] seq_file:update file->f_pos when lseek() to m->read_pos

After pread(), file->f_pos and m->read_pos get different,
and lseek() to m->read_pos did not update file->f_pos, then
a subsequent read may read from a wrong position, the following
program shows the problem:

char str1[32] = { 0 };
char str2[32] = { 0 };
int poffset = 10;
int count = 20;

/*open any seq file*/
int fd = open("/proc/modules", O_RDONLY);

pread(fd, str1, count, poffset);
printf("pread:%s\n", str1);

/*seek to where m->read_pos is*/
lseek(fd, poffset+count, SEEK_SET);

/*supposed to read from poffset+count, but this read from position 0*/
read(fd, str2, count);
printf("read:%s\n", str2);

Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Wang <[email protected]>
---
fs/seq_file.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
index 774c1eb..4b22b26 100644
--- a/fs/seq_file.c
+++ b/fs/seq_file.c
@@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ loff_t seq_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
m->read_pos = offset;
retval = file->f_pos = offset;
}
- }
+ } else
+ file->f_pos = offset;
}
file->f_version = m->version;
mutex_unlock(&m->lock);
--
1.8.1.2


2013-07-01 12:41:43

by fangdong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file:update file->f_pos when lseek() to m->read_pos

On 06/29/2013 05:11 AM, Jiaxing Wang wrote:
> After pread(), file->f_pos and m->read_pos get different,
> and lseek() to m->read_pos did not update file->f_pos, then
> a subsequent read may read from a wrong position, the following
> program shows the problem:
>
> char str1[32] = { 0 };
> char str2[32] = { 0 };
> int poffset = 10;
> int count = 20;
>
> /*open any seq file*/
> int fd = open("/proc/modules", O_RDONLY);
>
> pread(fd, str1, count, poffset);
> printf("pread:%s\n", str1);
>
> /*seek to where m->read_pos is*/
> lseek(fd, poffset+count, SEEK_SET);
>
> /*supposed to read from poffset+count, but this read from position 0*/
> read(fd, str2, count);
> printf("read:%s\n", str2);
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/seq_file.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
> index 774c1eb..4b22b26 100644
> --- a/fs/seq_file.c
> +++ b/fs/seq_file.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ loff_t seq_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
> m->read_pos = offset;
> retval = file->f_pos = offset;
> }
> - }
> + } else
> + file->f_pos = offset;
> }
> file->f_version = m->version;
> mutex_unlock(&m->lock);
>
This does not appear to be a problem, in linux man page, the behaver
seems clearly defined:

DESCRIPTION
pread() reads up to count bytes from file descriptor fd at
offset off-set (from the start of the file) into the buffer starting
at buf. The file offset is not changed.

pwrite() writes up to count bytes from the buffer starting at
buf to the file descriptor fd at offset offset. The file offset
is not changed.

2013-07-01 12:52:24

by remaper

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file:update file->f_pos when lseek() to m->read_pos

On 06/29/2013 05:11 AM, Jiaxing Wang wrote:
> After pread(), file->f_pos and m->read_pos get different,
> and lseek() to m->read_pos did not update file->f_pos, then
> a subsequent read may read from a wrong position, the following
> program shows the problem:
>
> char str1[32] = { 0 };
> char str2[32] = { 0 };
> int poffset = 10;
> int count = 20;
>
> /*open any seq file*/
> int fd = open("/proc/modules", O_RDONLY);
>
> pread(fd, str1, count, poffset);
> printf("pread:%s\n", str1);
>
> /*seek to where m->read_pos is*/
> lseek(fd, poffset+count, SEEK_SET);
>
> /*supposed to read from poffset+count, but this read from position 0*/
> read(fd, str2, count);
> printf("read:%s\n", str2);
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/seq_file.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
> index 774c1eb..4b22b26 100644
> --- a/fs/seq_file.c
> +++ b/fs/seq_file.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ loff_t seq_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
> m->read_pos = offset;
> retval = file->f_pos = offset;
> }
> - }
> + } else
> + file->f_pos = offset;
> }
> file->f_version = m->version;
> mutex_unlock(&m->lock);
>
This does not appear to be a problem, in linux man page, the behaver
seems clearly defined:

DESCRIPTION
pread() reads up to count bytes from file descriptor fd at
offset off-set (from the start of the file) into the buffer starting
at buf. The file offset is not changed.
pwrite() writes up to count bytes from the buffer starting at
buf to the file descriptor fd at offset offset. The file
offset is not changed.

2013-07-02 00:44:08

by Jiaxing Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file:update file->f_pos when lseek() to m->read_pos

On 07/01/2013 08:41 PM, fangdong wrote:
> On 06/29/2013 05:11 AM, Jiaxing Wang wrote:
>> After pread(), file->f_pos and m->read_pos get different,
>> and lseek() to m->read_pos did not update file->f_pos, then
>> a subsequent read may read from a wrong position, the following
>> program shows the problem:
>>
>> char str1[32] = { 0 };
>> char str2[32] = { 0 };
>> int poffset = 10;
>> int count = 20;
>>
>> /*open any seq file*/
>> int fd = open("/proc/modules", O_RDONLY);
>>
>> pread(fd, str1, count, poffset);
>> printf("pread:%s\n", str1);
>>
>> /*seek to where m->read_pos is*/
>> lseek(fd, poffset+count, SEEK_SET);
>>
>> /*supposed to read from poffset+count, but this read from position 0*/
>> read(fd, str2, count);
>> printf("read:%s\n", str2);
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/seq_file.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
>> index 774c1eb..4b22b26 100644
>> --- a/fs/seq_file.c
>> +++ b/fs/seq_file.c
>> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ loff_t seq_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>> m->read_pos = offset;
>> retval = file->f_pos = offset;
>> }
>> - }
>> + } else
>> + file->f_pos = offset;
>> }
>> file->f_version = m->version;
>> mutex_unlock(&m->lock);
>>
> This does not appear to be a problem, in linux man page, the behaver seems clearly defined:
>
> DESCRIPTION
> pread() reads up to count bytes from file descriptor fd at offset off-set (from the start of the file) into the buffer starting at buf. The file offset is not changed.
>
> pwrite() writes up to count bytes from the buffer starting at buf to the file descriptor fd at offset offset. The file offset is not changed.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
There's no problem that pread() don't change file->f_pos, but I think lseek() should have changed it.
Any comments from other people, and Alexander?

2013-07-04 02:03:49

by Gu Zheng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file:update file->f_pos when lseek() to m->read_pos

Hi Jiaxing,
Please refer to inline comment.:)
On 07/02/2013 08:43 AM, Jiaxing Wang wrote:

> On 07/01/2013 08:41 PM, fangdong wrote:
>> On 06/29/2013 05:11 AM, Jiaxing Wang wrote:
>>> After pread(), file->f_pos and m->read_pos get different,
>>> and lseek() to m->read_pos did not update file->f_pos, then
>>> a subsequent read may read from a wrong position, the following
>>> program shows the problem:
>>>
>>> char str1[32] = { 0 };
>>> char str2[32] = { 0 };
>>> int poffset = 10;
>>> int count = 20;
>>>
>>> /*open any seq file*/
>>> int fd = open("/proc/modules", O_RDONLY);
>>>
>>> pread(fd, str1, count, poffset);
>>> printf("pread:%s\n", str1);
>>>
>>> /*seek to where m->read_pos is*/
>>> lseek(fd, poffset+count, SEEK_SET);
>>>
>>> /*supposed to read from poffset+count, but this read from position 0*/
>>> read(fd, str2, count);
>>> printf("read:%s\n", str2);
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxing Wang <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/seq_file.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
>>> index 774c1eb..4b22b26 100644
>>> --- a/fs/seq_file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/seq_file.c
>>> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ loff_t seq_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>>> m->read_pos = offset;
>>> retval = file->f_pos = offset;
>>> }
>>> - }
>>> + } else
>>> + file->f_pos = offset;
>>> }
>>> file->f_version = m->version;
>>> mutex_unlock(&m->lock);
>>>
>> This does not appear to be a problem, in linux man page, the behaver seems clearly defined:
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>> pread() reads up to count bytes from file descriptor fd at offset off-set (from the start of the file) into the buffer starting at buf. The file offset is not changed.
>>
>> pwrite() writes up to count bytes from the buffer starting at buf to the file descriptor fd at offset offset. The file offset is not changed.
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> There's no problem that pread() don't change file->f_pos, but I think lseek() should have changed it.

No, the way that seq_seek deal with pos is right. Remember this seq file, it is
an iterator interface, e.g. it provides infos of each element of a list, so the
we should make sure that the info we read from seq file is the whole infos of
each entry, so seq_lseek can not set pos to a optional point, only can on the
points that divided by a whole infos size of each entry. If we can not set pos
on the special position, ste it as 0, I think it's reasonable.

Thanks,
Gu

> Any comments from other people, and Alexander?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>