2013-07-25 18:52:37

by Tom Rini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] numa: Mark __node_set as __always_inline

It is posible for some compilers to decide that __node_set does not need
to be made turned into an inline function. When the compiler does this
on an __init function calling it on __initdata we get a section mismatch
warning now. Use __always_inline to ensure that we will be inlined.

Reported-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]>
Cc: Jianpeng Ma <[email protected]>
Cc: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Wen Congyang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>

---
Changes in v2:
- As per KOSAKI Motohiro, add a comment as well about why we need
__always_inline to the header.
---
include/linux/nodemask.h | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
index 4e2cbfa..58b9a02 100644
--- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
+++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
@@ -98,8 +98,17 @@
typedef struct { DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, MAX_NUMNODES); } nodemask_t;
extern nodemask_t _unused_nodemask_arg_;

+/*
+ * The inline keyword gives the compiler room to decide to inline, or
+ * not inline a function as it sees best. However, as these functions
+ * are called in both __init and non-__init functions, if they are not
+ * inlined we will end up with a section mis-match error (of the type of
+ * freeable items not being freed). So we must use __always_inline here
+ * to fix the problem. If other functions in the future also end up in
+ * this situation they will also need to be annotated as __always_inline
+ */
#define node_set(node, dst) __node_set((node), &(dst))
-static inline void __node_set(int node, volatile nodemask_t *dstp)
+static __always_inline void __node_set(int node, volatile nodemask_t *dstp)
{
set_bit(node, dstp->bits);
}
--
1.7.9.5


2013-07-25 19:15:55

by KOSAKI Motohiro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] numa: Mark __node_set as __always_inline

> +/*
> + * The inline keyword gives the compiler room to decide to inline, or
> + * not inline a function as it sees best. However, as these functions
> + * are called in both __init and non-__init functions, if they are not
> + * inlined we will end up with a section mis-match error (of the type of
> + * freeable items not being freed). So we must use __always_inline here
> + * to fix the problem. If other functions in the future also end up in
> + * this situation they will also need to be annotated as __always_inline
> + */
> #define node_set(node, dst) __node_set((node), &(dst))
> -static inline void __node_set(int node, volatile nodemask_t *dstp)
> +static __always_inline void __node_set(int node, volatile nodemask_t *dstp)
> {
> set_bit(node, dstp->bits);
> }
>

Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>

Subject: [tip:sched/core] numa: Mark __node_set() as __always_inline

Commit-ID: 323f54ed0f3ce20e9946c961fc928ccdb80d9345
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/323f54ed0f3ce20e9946c961fc928ccdb80d9345
Author: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:26:10 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:54:01 +0200

numa: Mark __node_set() as __always_inline

It is posible for some compilers to decide that __node_set() does
not need to be made turned into an inline function. When the
compiler does this on an __init function calling it on
__initdata we get a section mismatch warning now. Use
__always_inline to ensure that we will be inlined.

Reported-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]>
Cc: Jianpeng Ma <[email protected]>
Cc: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Wen Congyang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiang Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/nodemask.h | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
index 4e2cbfa..58b9a02 100644
--- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
+++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
@@ -98,8 +98,17 @@
typedef struct { DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, MAX_NUMNODES); } nodemask_t;
extern nodemask_t _unused_nodemask_arg_;

+/*
+ * The inline keyword gives the compiler room to decide to inline, or
+ * not inline a function as it sees best. However, as these functions
+ * are called in both __init and non-__init functions, if they are not
+ * inlined we will end up with a section mis-match error (of the type of
+ * freeable items not being freed). So we must use __always_inline here
+ * to fix the problem. If other functions in the future also end up in
+ * this situation they will also need to be annotated as __always_inline
+ */
#define node_set(node, dst) __node_set((node), &(dst))
-static inline void __node_set(int node, volatile nodemask_t *dstp)
+static __always_inline void __node_set(int node, volatile nodemask_t *dstp)
{
set_bit(node, dstp->bits);
}