2014-01-08 16:31:32

by Laszlo Papp

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Documentation: spelling

Hi,

which spelling is preferred for the documentation when sending patches?

I see the UK'ish "initialise" as well as the US'ish "initialization"
within the same close to each other.

Cheers, L.


2014-01-08 18:54:04

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Documentation: spelling

On 01/08/2014 08:31 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> which spelling is preferred for the documentation when sending patches?
>
> I see the UK'ish "initialise" as well as the US'ish "initialization"
> within the same close to each other.

We accept either UK or US spellings.

It would be nice to be consistent within one document, but about all
that we can count on is for one person to be consistent most of the
time.

--
~Randy

2014-01-08 21:11:18

by Laszlo Papp

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Documentation: spelling

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 08:31 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> which spelling is preferred for the documentation when sending patches?
>>
>> I see the UK'ish "initialise" as well as the US'ish "initialization"
>> within the same close to each other.
>
>
> We accept either UK or US spellings.
>
> It would be nice to be consistent within one document, but about all
> that we can count on is for one person to be consistent most of the
> time.
>
> --
> ~Randy

Thanks Randy!

So, does that mean if I fix grammar or typo issues in a file, I should
also fix the UK'ish terms by replacing them with the US'ish when both
types are occurring?

2014-01-08 21:44:53

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Documentation: spelling

On 01/08/14 13:11, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 01/08/2014 08:31 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> which spelling is preferred for the documentation when sending patches?
>>>
>>> I see the UK'ish "initialise" as well as the US'ish "initialization"
>>> within the same close to each other.
>>
>>
>> We accept either UK or US spellings.
>>
>> It would be nice to be consistent within one document, but about all
>> that we can count on is for one person to be consistent most of the
>> time.
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy
>
> Thanks Randy!
>
> So, does that mean if I fix grammar or typo issues in a file, I should
> also fix the UK'ish terms by replacing them with the US'ish when both
> types are occurring?

I would say the fewer "trivial" changes, the better, so don't change them
if they are correct in either spelling.

--
~Randy

2014-01-09 01:41:02

by Laszlo Papp

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Documentation: spelling

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/08/14 13:11, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 01/08/2014 08:31 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> which spelling is preferred for the documentation when sending patches?
>>>>
>>>> I see the UK'ish "initialise" as well as the US'ish "initialization"
>>>> within the same close to each other.
>>>
>>>
>>> We accept either UK or US spellings.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to be consistent within one document, but about all
>>> that we can count on is for one person to be consistent most of the
>>> time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ~Randy
>>
>> Thanks Randy!
>>
>> So, does that mean if I fix grammar or typo issues in a file, I should
>> also fix the UK'ish terms by replacing them with the US'ish when both
>> types are occurring?
>
> I would say the fewer "trivial" changes, the better, so don't change them
> if they are correct in either spelling.

Strange, but ok, thanks.