2014-02-26 19:29:50

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: mtip32xx blk-mq status?

Hi all,

with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje major
example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
conversion finished and merged?


2014-02-26 19:40:40

by Asai Thambi SP

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: mtip32xx blk-mq status?

On 2/26/2014 11:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje major
> example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
> conversion finished and merged?

We are working on few changes in mtip32xx. After that, we will get to
blk-mq merge.

--
Regards,
Asai

2014-02-26 21:11:11

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: mtip32xx blk-mq status?

On 2014-02-26 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje major
> example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
> conversion finished and merged?

I'll pick up the pieces as soon as I get back and can test again. The
basic conversion is easy enough, I'll just dust that off. On top of that
I started splitting the issue groups up, since it actually gets you a
good step further than just the basic conversion.

The only problem area I ran into was the special case of the unaligned
writes.

--
Jens Axboe

2014-02-27 04:42:30

by Sam Bradshaw

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: mtip32xx blk-mq status?


> On 2014-02-26 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje
> major
> > example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
> > conversion finished and merged?
>
> I'll pick up the pieces as soon as I get back and can test again. The
> basic conversion is easy enough, I'll just dust that off. On top of
> that
> I started splitting the issue groups up, since it actually gets you a
> good step further than just the basic conversion.

If you have a public branch for the latter, send it our way. We can
help with the SRSI testing.

> The only problem area I ran into was the special case of the unaligned
> writes.

Yup, it's a painful limitation. If you need any p420m hardware, let me
know.

-Sam

2014-02-27 05:07:13

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: mtip32xx blk-mq status?

On 2014-02-26 20:42, Sam Bradshaw (sbradshaw) wrote:
>
>> On 2014-02-26 11:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> with blk-mq stabilizing in mainline and Jens using mtip32xx as tje
>> major
>>> example drivers in the past is there any progress on getting the
>>> conversion finished and merged?
>>
>> I'll pick up the pieces as soon as I get back and can test again. The
>> basic conversion is easy enough, I'll just dust that off. On top of
>> that
>> I started splitting the issue groups up, since it actually gets you a
>> good step further than just the basic conversion.
>
> If you have a public branch for the latter, send it our way. We can
> help with the SRSI testing.

Thanks, I'll get it setup next week.

>> The only problem area I ran into was the special case of the unaligned
>> writes.
>
> Yup, it's a painful limitation. If you need any p420m hardware, let me
> know.

Sure, a card for testing is always useful.

--
Jens Axboe