The seq number of HOST2BMC message in debug message
is not the real seq number but the next seq number;
we could directly just use bt->write_data[2].
pre:
[99477.760284] BT: +++++++++++++++++ New command
[99477.760286] BT: NetFn/LUN CMD [1 data]: 28 10 0c
[99477.760296] BT: write 5 bytes seq=0x88 04 28 87 10 0c
^^^^^^^^ ^^
[99477.772078] BT: got 8 bytes seq=0x87 07 2c 87 10 00 f8 07 00
[99477.772091] BT: result 6 bytes: 2c 10 00 f8 07 00
post:
[99477.760284] BT: +++++++++++++++++ New command
[99477.760286] BT: NetFn/LUN CMD [1 data]: 28 10 0c
[99477.760296] BT: write 5 bytes seq=0x87 04 28 87 10 0c
^^^^^^^^ ^^
[99477.772078] BT: got 8 bytes seq=0x87 07 2c 87 10 00 f8 07 00
[99477.772091] BT: result 6 bytes: 2c 10 00 f8 07 00
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_bt_sm.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_bt_sm.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_bt_sm.c
index f5e4cd7..1a2056f 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_bt_sm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_bt_sm.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static inline void write_all_bytes(struct si_sm_data *bt)
if (bt_debug & BT_DEBUG_MSG) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "BT: write %d bytes seq=0x%02X",
- bt->write_count, bt->seq);
+ bt->write_count, bt->write_data[2]);
for (i = 0; i < bt->write_count; i++)
printk(" %02x", bt->write_data[i]);
printk("\n");
--
1.6.0.2