2014-04-18 10:01:20

by Ingo Molnar

Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] sched: Get rid of opened code implementation of funtion nice_to_rlimit().

So the patch title has two typos and a superfluous period.

I really don't want to apply patches that only get written but don't
get read...

Thanks,

Ingo

2014-04-18 10:15:01

by Dongsheng Yang

Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] sched: Get rid of opened code implementation of funtion nice_to_rlimit().

On 04/18/2014 07:01 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So the patch title has two typos and a superfluous period.

Really sorry for that. :( I will update it right now.
> I really don't want to apply patches that only get written but don't
> get read...

Spelling double-check was added in my checklist, wish it can make my work
better. :)

Dongsheng
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>

2014-04-18 10:19:50

by Ingo Molnar

Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] sched: Get rid of opened code implementation of funtion nice_to_rlimit().

* Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 04/18/2014 07:01 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >So the patch title has two typos and a superfluous period.
>
> Really sorry for that. :( I will update it right now.

Please wait for the next -tip update before you resend the series -
I've applied a handful of other patches from you, which will reduce
the size of your queue.

Thanks,

Ingo

2014-04-18 10:24:36

by Dongsheng Yang

Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] sched: Get rid of opened code implementation of funtion nice_to_rlimit().

On 04/18/2014 07:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 04/18/2014 07:01 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> So the patch title has two typos and a superfluous period.
>> Really sorry for that. :( I will update it right now.
> Please wait for the next -tip update before you resend the series -
> I've applied a handful of other patches from you, which will reduce
> the size of your queue.

Okey, thanx !

>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>