Hi Chris,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Chris Metcalf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Feel free to take v2 below. Thanks!
>>
>> From d761d4d63945ff0a6eab5a9058c132f870c92aff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:33:29 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH -v2] tile: Remove tile-specific _sinitdata and _einitdata
>>
>> Use standard __init_begin and __init_end instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
>
> Taken into the tile tree; thanks! (I did fix one extra place where it mentioned _sinitdata in a comment.)
I'm going through old patches, and it seems this is still not upstream?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
On 7/9/2014 2:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Chris Metcalf <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 11/14/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Feel free to take v2 below. Thanks!
>>>
>>> From d761d4d63945ff0a6eab5a9058c132f870c92aff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:33:29 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH -v2] tile: Remove tile-specific _sinitdata and _einitdata
>>>
>>> Use standard __init_begin and __init_end instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>>> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
>> Taken into the tile tree; thanks! (I did fix one extra place where it mentioned _sinitdata in a comment.)
> I'm going through old patches, and it seems this is still not upstream?
Yes, and I'm not at all sure what happened. There were a couple of mistakes
in the original post (einittext converted instead of einitdata), and maybe I
ended up dropping it entirely instead of taking v2.
In any case it's now in the tile tree and upstreamed to linux-tile so you
should see it in linux-next shortly.
Sorry!
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Chris Metcalf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/9/2014 2:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/14/2013 3:31 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> Feel free to take v2 below. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> From d761d4d63945ff0a6eab5a9058c132f870c92aff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:33:29 +0100
>>>> Subject: [PATCH -v2] tile: Remove tile-specific _sinitdata and
>>>> _einitdata
>>>>
>>>> Use standard __init_begin and __init_end instead.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>>>> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Taken into the tile tree; thanks! (I did fix one extra place where it
>>> mentioned _sinitdata in a comment.)
>>
>> I'm going through old patches, and it seems this is still not upstream?
>
>
> Yes, and I'm not at all sure what happened. There were a couple of mistakes
> in the original post (einittext converted instead of einitdata), and maybe I
> ended up dropping it entirely instead of taking v2.
>
> In any case it's now in the tile tree and upstreamed to linux-tile so you
> should see it in linux-next shortly.
Thanks!
> Sorry!
No problem. I was just going through old stuff that had accumulated in
my local tree.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds