2014-10-11 01:15:43

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

Fix:

In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
from init/main.c:18:
./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
# error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
^
./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
#define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
^

and:

In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];

by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.

Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
---
Compile tested and booted in qemu for both SMP and non-SMP builds.

arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 2 --
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 8e24ef3..33199a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
#ifndef __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
#define __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H

-#include <asm/smp.h>
+#include <asm/smp_plat.h>

static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
{
- return !!__smp_cross_call;
+ return have_smp_crosscall();
}

#endif /* __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index 780f82c..a498f2c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ extern void smp_init_cpus(void);
*/
extern void set_smp_cross_call(void (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int));

-extern void (*__smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
-
/*
* Called from the secondary holding pen, this is the secondary CPU entry point.
*/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
index 59e2823..9ae4fde 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
@@ -21,6 +21,21 @@

#include <asm/types.h>

+/*
+ * Return true if we are running on a SMP platform
+ * and __smp_cross_call is installed.
+ */
+static inline bool have_smp_crosscall(void)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+ return false;
+#else
+ extern void (*__smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
+
+ return !!__smp_cross_call;
+#endif
+}
+
struct mpidr_hash {
u64 mask;
u32 shift_aff[4];
@@ -37,7 +52,7 @@ static inline u32 mpidr_hash_size(void)
/*
* Logical CPU mapping.
*/
-extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
+extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[];
#define cpu_logical_map(cpu) __cpu_logical_map[cpu]

#endif /* __ASM_SMP_PLAT_H */
--
1.9.1


2014-10-11 13:16:25

by Frederic Weisbecker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Fix:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
> from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
> from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
> from init/main.c:18:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
> error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> ^
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
> #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
> ^
>
> and:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
> error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>
> by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
> and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.
>
> Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

That looks good to me.

Note, ARM64 is one of the archs I couldn't test due to the lack of a
nolibc cross compiler in https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

Thanks!

2014-10-11 14:49:54

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On 10/11/2014 06:16 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Fix:
>>
>> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
>> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
>> from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
>> from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
>> from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
>> from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
>> from init/main.c:18:
>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
>> error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
>> # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
>> ^
>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
>> #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
>> ^
>>
>> and:
>>
>> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
>> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
>> from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
>> error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
>> extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>>
>> by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
>> and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.
>>
>> Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
>
> That looks good to me.
>
> Note, ARM64 is one of the archs I couldn't test due to the lack of a
> nolibc cross compiler in https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
>
No worries. Even if you had, you might not have caught the non-SMP case.
I only recently added a non-SMP build myself.

Is the toolchain issue out of principle (not wanting to use a cross
compiler that includes glibc) or because you did not find a cross
compiler ? Linaro provides toolchains for aarch64, though they are
only 32 bit. I built one myself using buildroot (select binutils 2.24
and gcc 4.9.1).

In general I have been quite successful using buildroot to create
toolchains, including ones for oddball architectures like score
(after patching buildroot to support it, of course).

Guenter

2014-10-11 16:45:23

by Alexei Starovoitov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Note, ARM64 is one of the archs I couldn't test due to the lack of a
> nolibc cross compiler in https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

that table is not up to date. There is one there for aarch64:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.9.0/

2014-10-19 15:22:16

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Fix:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
> from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
> from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
> from init/main.c:18:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
> error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> ^
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
> #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
> ^
>
> and:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
> error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>
> by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
> and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.
>
> Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

ping ...

The commit causing the problem has been applied to 3.17, meaning
this patch, once in mainline, will have to be applied to 3.17 as well.

Guenter

> ---
> Compile tested and booted in qemu for both SMP and non-SMP builds.
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 2 --
> arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> index 8e24ef3..33199a9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
> #define __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
>
> -#include <asm/smp.h>
> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>
> static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
> {
> - return !!__smp_cross_call;
> + return have_smp_crosscall();
> }
>
> #endif /* __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> index 780f82c..a498f2c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ extern void smp_init_cpus(void);
> */
> extern void set_smp_cross_call(void (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int));
>
> -extern void (*__smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
> -
> /*
> * Called from the secondary holding pen, this is the secondary CPU entry point.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
> index 59e2823..9ae4fde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,21 @@
>
> #include <asm/types.h>
>
> +/*
> + * Return true if we are running on a SMP platform
> + * and __smp_cross_call is installed.
> + */
> +static inline bool have_smp_crosscall(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> + return false;
> +#else
> + extern void (*__smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
> +
> + return !!__smp_cross_call;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> struct mpidr_hash {
> u64 mask;
> u32 shift_aff[4];
> @@ -37,7 +52,7 @@ static inline u32 mpidr_hash_size(void)
> /*
> * Logical CPU mapping.
> */
> -extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
> +extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[];
> #define cpu_logical_map(cpu) __cpu_logical_map[cpu]
>
> #endif /* __ASM_SMP_PLAT_H */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>

2014-10-20 17:22:22

by Catalin Marinas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:15:34AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Fix:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
> from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
> from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
> from init/main.c:18:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
> error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> ^
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
> #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
> ^
>
> and:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
> error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>
> by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
> and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.
>
> Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Isn't something like this simpler:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 8e24ef3f7c82..b4f6b19a8a68 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
#define __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H

+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
#include <asm/smp.h>

static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
@@ -8,4 +10,13 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
return !!__smp_cross_call;
}

+#else
+
+static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+#endif
+
#endif /* __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H */

2014-10-20 18:14:00

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:22:09PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:15:34AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Fix:
> >
> > In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> > from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> > from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
> > from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
> > from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> > from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
> > from init/main.c:18:
> > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
> > error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> > # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
> > ^
> > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
> > #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
> > ^
> >
> > and:
> >
> > In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
> > from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
> > from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
> > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
> > error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> > extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
> >
> > by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
> > and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.
> >
> > Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
>
> Isn't something like this simpler:
>

Yes, that works as well.

Feel free to add my Tested-by: if you want to take that patch.

Thanks,
Guenter

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> index 8e24ef3f7c82..b4f6b19a8a68 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
> #define __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +
> #include <asm/smp.h>
>
> static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
> @@ -8,4 +10,13 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
> return !!__smp_cross_call;
> }
>
> +#else
> +
> +static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H */