2014-10-21 14:50:22

by Nicolas Ferre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: add atmel ssc driver maintainer entry

On 29/09/2014 10:36, Nicolas Ferre :
> On 28/09/2014 03:57, Bo Shen :
>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <[email protected]>
>
> Sure:
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks.

Greg or Arnd,

This MAINTAINER's update didn't make it during merge window (on the
other hand, I didn't build a pull-request with it neither...).

Do you want that I take it in one of my "fixes" pull-requests to arm-soc
for 3.18 or do you feel like taking the patch directly? I think it makes
sense to not wait for the 3.19 for this kind of useful information.

Thanks, bye,


>> ---
>>
>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 3705430..c004e6f 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1703,6 +1703,13 @@ M: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
>> S: Supported
>> F: drivers/spi/spi-atmel.*
>>
>> +ATMEL SSC DRIVER
>> +M: Bo Shen <[email protected]>
>> +L: [email protected] (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c
>> +F: include/linux/atmel-ssc.h
>> +
>> ATMEL Timer Counter (TC) AND CLOCKSOURCE DRIVERS
>> M: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
>> L: [email protected] (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>
>
>


--
Nicolas Ferre


2014-10-21 21:34:06

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: add atmel ssc driver maintainer entry

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 29/09/2014 10:36, Nicolas Ferre :
> > On 28/09/2014 03:57, Bo Shen :
> >> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <[email protected]>
> >
> > Sure:
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Greg or Arnd,
>
> This MAINTAINER's update didn't make it during merge window (on the
> other hand, I didn't build a pull-request with it neither...).
>
> Do you want that I take it in one of my "fixes" pull-requests to arm-soc
> for 3.18 or do you feel like taking the patch directly? I think it makes
> sense to not wait for the 3.19 for this kind of useful information.

Feel free to take it in one of your "fixes" pull requests.

thanks,

greg k-h