Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select
STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110).
It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects
STIH407_RESET.
There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in
next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a
nop.
I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry
do something. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
Hi Paul,
On 11/10/2014 11:22 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select
> STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110).
> It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects
> STIH407_RESET.
>
> There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in
> next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a
> nop.
>
> I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry
> do something. Is that correct?
Exactly.
The STIH407_RESET symbol is introduced in Reset sub-system.
The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19:
http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19
Commit: 3ba9204308eb51fe98fb1ab352c17d5319f26724
Best regards,
Maxime
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:27 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19:
> http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19
That tree isn't part of linux-next, is it? Is it included in a tree that
itself is included in linux-next, so that it will end up in linux-next
one of these days?
Paul Bolle
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Your commit c27321141915 ("ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select
> STIH407_RESET") was included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141110).
> It adds a Kconfig entry for SOC_STIH407. That entry selects
> STIH407_RESET.
>
> There's no Kconfig symbol STIH407_RESET. And there's nothing in
> next-20141110 that cares about SOC_STIH407. So this entry is currently a
> nop.
You're right, thanks for your diligence.
> I assume that there are one or more patches queued that make this entry
> do something. Is that correct?
That is also true. Patch is en route.
It should be coming through the reset tree and arm-soc.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
On 11/10/2014 11:49 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:27 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> The STiH407 reset has been merged in Philipp Zabel Reset tree for v3.19:
>> http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=pza/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reset/for_v3.19
> That tree isn't part of linux-next, is it? Is it included in a tree that
> itself is included in linux-next, so that it will end up in linux-next
> one of these days?
I don't know if reset tree is regularly merged into linux-next.
I let Philipp, its maintainer, answer.
Kind regards,
Maxime
>
> Paul Bolle
>