2014-12-04 14:25:31

by rui wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>

There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:

[ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
[ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E 3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20

[ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND, BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
[ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9 0000000000000000
[ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff ffff88046eb3e0d0
[ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa 000000017f6898b8
[ 65.666830] Call Trace:
[ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
[ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
[ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
[ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
[ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
[ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
[ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
[ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
[ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120 [drm]
[ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
[ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>] drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
[ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
[ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
[ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
[ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
[ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
[ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
[ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
[ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
[ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
[ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
[ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
[ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
[ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
[ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
[ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
[ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
[ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
[ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
[ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
[ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
[ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180

There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
works with the latest kernel.

Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
index 0c0c39b..70dd2f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
@@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap, struct fb_info *info)
int i, j, rc = 0;
int start;

- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return -EBUSY;
@@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
int ret = 0;
int i;

- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return -EBUSY;
--
1.7.5.4


2014-12-05 12:40:13

by rui wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

BTW, the impact of this bug is that the panic cannot reboot the
machine and it prints an infinite stream of the error messages. The
panic goes on forever because there's a for(;;) loop in
__mutex_lock_common(), so we enter __schedule() again and again.

Thanks
Rui

On 12/4/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>
> There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
> sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:
>
> [ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
> [ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E
> 3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20
>
> [ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND, BIOS
> BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
> [ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9
> 0000000000000000
> [ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff
> ffff88046eb3e0d0
> [ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa
> 000000017f6898b8
> [ 65.666830] Call Trace:
> [ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
> [ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
> [ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
> [ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
> [ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
> [ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
> [ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
> [ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
> [ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120
> [drm]
> [ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
> [ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>] drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0
> [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
> [ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
> [ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
> [ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
> [ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
> [ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
> [ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
> [ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
> [ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
> [ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
> [ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
> [ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
> [ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
> [ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
> [ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
> [ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
> [ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
> [ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
> [ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>]
> cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
> [ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
> [ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
> [ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180
>
> There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
> purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
> works with the latest kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> index 0c0c39b..70dd2f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> @@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap, struct
> fb_info *info)
> int i, j, rc = 0;
> int start;
>
> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo
> *var,
> int ret = 0;
> int i;
>
> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> return -EBUSY;
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

2014-12-10 00:09:45

by rui wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

Hi All,

Any comment ? Or any better idea how this should be fixed?

Regards,
Rui

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:11:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]

From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>

There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:

[ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
[ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E
3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20

[ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND,
BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
[ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9
0000000000000000
[ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff
ffff88046eb3e0d0
[ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa
000000017f6898b8
[ 65.666830] Call Trace:
[ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
[ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
[ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
[ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
[ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
[ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
[ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
[ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
[ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120 [drm]
[ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
[ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>]
drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
[ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
[ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
[ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
[ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
[ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
[ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
[ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
[ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
[ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
[ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
[ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
[ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
[ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
[ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
[ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
[ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
[ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
[ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
[ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
[ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
[ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180

There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
works with the latest kernel.

Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
index 0c0c39b..70dd2f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
@@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap,
struct fb_info *info)
int i, j, rc = 0;
int start;

- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return -EBUSY;
@@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
int ret = 0;
int i;

- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return -EBUSY;
--
1.7.5.4

2014-12-10 00:51:29

by Rob Clark

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

perhaps fb helpers could use __drm_modeset_lock_all() w/ trylock=true
in panic context?

BR,
-R

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:09 PM, rui wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any comment ? Or any better idea how this should be fixed?
>
> Regards,
> Rui
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:11:35 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context
> To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>
> There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
> sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:
>
> [ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
> [ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E
> 3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20
>
> [ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND,
> BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
> [ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9
> 0000000000000000
> [ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff
> ffff88046eb3e0d0
> [ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa
> 000000017f6898b8
> [ 65.666830] Call Trace:
> [ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
> [ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
> [ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
> [ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
> [ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
> [ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
> [ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
> [ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
> [ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120 [drm]
> [ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
> [ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>]
> drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
> [ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
> [ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
> [ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
> [ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
> [ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
> [ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
> [ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
> [ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
> [ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
> [ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
> [ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
> [ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
> [ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
> [ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
> [ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
> [ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
> [ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
> [ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
> [ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
> [ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
> [ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180
>
> There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
> purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
> works with the latest kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> index 0c0c39b..70dd2f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
> @@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap,
> struct fb_info *info)
> int i, j, rc = 0;
> int start;
>
> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
> int ret = 0;
> int i;
>
> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> return -EBUSY;
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

2014-12-10 00:55:16

by rui wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

Hi Rob,
Yes it's exactly what I'm doing. Please scroll down and review my patch.

Thanks
Rui

On 12/10/14, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> perhaps fb helpers could use __drm_modeset_lock_all() w/ trylock=true
> in panic context?
>
> BR,
> -R
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:09 PM, rui wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Any comment ? Or any better idea how this should be fixed?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rui
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:11:35 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context
>> To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>>
>> From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>>
>> There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
>> sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:
>>
>> [ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
>> [ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E
>> 3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20
>>
>> [ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND,
>> BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
>> [ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff
>> ffff88046eb3e0d0
>> [ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa
>> 000000017f6898b8
>> [ 65.666830] Call Trace:
>> [ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
>> [ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
>> [ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
>> [ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
>> [ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
>> [ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
>> [ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
>> [ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
>> [ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
>> [ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120
>> [drm]
>> [ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
>> [ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>]
>> drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
>> [ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
>> [ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
>> [ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
>> [ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
>> [ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
>> [ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
>> [ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
>> [ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
>> [ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
>> [ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
>> [ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
>> [ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
>> [ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
>> [ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
>> [ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
>> [ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
>> [ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
>> [ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>]
>> cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
>> [ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
>> [ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
>> [ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180
>>
>> There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
>> purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
>> works with the latest kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>> index 0c0c39b..70dd2f4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>> @@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap,
>> struct fb_info *info)
>> int i, j, rc = 0;
>> int start;
>>
>> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
>> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> @@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo
>> *var,
>> int ret = 0;
>> int i;
>>
>> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
>> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>> in
>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>> in
>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

2014-12-10 01:05:30

by Rob Clark

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

oh, whoops.. gmail hiding quoted text..

yeah, that looks sane,

Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:55 PM, rui wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> Yes it's exactly what I'm doing. Please scroll down and review my patch.
>
> Thanks
> Rui
>
> On 12/10/14, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>> perhaps fb helpers could use __drm_modeset_lock_all() w/ trylock=true
>> in panic context?
>>
>> BR,
>> -R
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:09 PM, rui wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Any comment ? Or any better idea how this should be fixed?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rui
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 22:11:35 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context
>>> To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
>>> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>
>>> From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
>>> sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:
>>>
>>> [ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
>>> [ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E
>>> 3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20
>>>
>>> [ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND,
>>> BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
>>> [ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> [ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff
>>> ffff88046eb3e0d0
>>> [ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa
>>> 000000017f6898b8
>>> [ 65.666830] Call Trace:
>>> [ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
>>> [ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
>>> [ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
>>> [ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
>>> [ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
>>> [ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
>>> [ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
>>> [ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
>>> [ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
>>> [ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120
>>> [drm]
>>> [ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
>>> [ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>]
>>> drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
>>> [ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
>>> [ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
>>> [ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
>>> [ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
>>> [ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
>>> [ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
>>> [ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
>>> [ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
>>> [ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
>>> [ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
>>> [ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
>>> [ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
>>> [ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
>>> [ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
>>> [ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
>>> [ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
>>> [ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
>>> [ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
>>> [ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>]
>>> cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
>>> [ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
>>> [ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
>>> [ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180
>>>
>>> There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
>>> purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
>>> works with the latest kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>> index 0c0c39b..70dd2f4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>> @@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap,
>>> struct fb_info *info)
>>> int i, j, rc = 0;
>>> int start;
>>>
>>> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>>> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> + }
>>> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
>>> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>>> return -EBUSY;
>>> @@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo
>>> *var,
>>> int ret = 0;
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>>> + if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>> + }
>>> if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
>>> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>>> return -EBUSY;
>>> --
>>> 1.7.5.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>> in
>>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>> in
>>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>

2014-12-10 20:19:39

by Borislav Petkov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:05:21PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> oh, whoops.. gmail hiding quoted text..
>
> yeah, that looks sane,
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:55 PM, rui wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > Yes it's exactly what I'm doing. Please scroll down and review my patch.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Rui
> >
> > On 12/10/14, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> perhaps fb helpers could use __drm_modeset_lock_all() w/ trylock=true
> >> in panic context?
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> -R
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:09 PM, rui wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Any comment ? Or any better idea how this should be fixed?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Rui
> >>>

Dear gmail-ers,

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Please stop the top-posting or use a mail client which doesn't
facilitate the idiocy.

Thanks.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

2014-12-15 19:28:36

by Luck, Tony

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fb helper should avoid sleeping in panic context

From: Rui Wang <[email protected]>

There are still some places in the fb helper that need to avoid
sleeping in panic context. Here's an example:

[ 65.615496] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
[ 65.620747] CPU: 92 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/92 Tainted: G M E 3.18.0-rc4-7-default+ #20

[ 65.630364] Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND, BIOS
BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014
[ 65.641923] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689878 ffffffff81566db9 0000000000000000
[ 65.650226] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f689898 ffffffff810871ff ffff88046eb3e0d0
[ 65.658527] ffff88087f693d80 ffff88087f6898c8 ffffffff8107c1fa 000000017f6898b8
[ 65.666830] Call Trace:
[ 65.669557] <#MC> [<ffffffff81566db9>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 65.675994] [<ffffffff810871ff>] dequeue_task_idle+0x2f/0x40
[ 65.682412] [<ffffffff8107c1fa>] dequeue_task+0x5a/0x80
[ 65.688345] [<ffffffff810804f3>] deactivate_task+0x23/0x30
[ 65.694569] [<ffffffff81569050>] __schedule+0x580/0x7f0
[ 65.700502] [<ffffffff81569739>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x29/0x70
[ 65.707696] [<ffffffff8156abb6>] __ww_mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb8/0x162
[ 65.714891] [<ffffffff8156acb3>] __ww_mutex_lock+0x53/0x85
[ 65.721125] [<ffffffffa00b3a5d>] drm_modeset_lock+0x3d/0x110 [drm]
[ 65.728132] [<ffffffffa00b3c2a>] __drm_modeset_lock_all+0x8a/0x120 [drm]
[ 65.735721] [<ffffffffa00b3cd0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x10/0x30 [drm]
[ 65.743015] [<ffffffffa01af8bf>] drm_fb_helper_pan_display+0x2f/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 65.751857] [<ffffffff8132bd21>] fb_pan_display+0xd1/0x1a0
[ 65.758081] [<ffffffff81326010>] bit_update_start+0x20/0x50
[ 65.764400] [<ffffffff813259f2>] fbcon_switch+0x3a2/0x550
[ 65.770528] [<ffffffff813a01c9>] redraw_screen+0x189/0x240
[ 65.776750] [<ffffffff81322f8a>] fbcon_blank+0x20a/0x2d0
[ 65.782778] [<ffffffff8137d359>] ? erst_writer+0x209/0x330
[ 65.789002] [<ffffffff810ba2f3>] ? internal_add_timer+0x63/0x80
[ 65.795710] [<ffffffff810bc137>] ? mod_timer+0x127/0x1e0
[ 65.801740] [<ffffffff813a0cd8>] do_unblank_screen+0xa8/0x1d0
[ 65.808255] [<ffffffff813a0e10>] unblank_screen+0x10/0x20
[ 65.814381] [<ffffffff812ca0d9>] bust_spinlocks+0x19/0x40
[ 65.820508] [<ffffffff81561ca7>] panic+0x106/0x1f5
[ 65.825955] [<ffffffff8102336c>] mce_panic+0x2ac/0x2e0
[ 65.831789] [<ffffffff812c796a>] ? delay_tsc+0x4a/0x80
[ 65.837625] [<ffffffff81024e1f>] do_machine_check+0xbaf/0xbf0
[ 65.844138] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
[ 65.850166] [<ffffffff8156f03f>] machine_check+0x1f/0x30
[ 65.856195] [<ffffffff813365d7>] ? intel_idle+0xc7/0x150
[ 65.862222] <<EOE>> [<ffffffff814283d5>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0x170
[ 65.869823] [<ffffffff814285a7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
[ 65.875852] [<ffffffff81097b08>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2d8/0x370
[ 65.882467] [<ffffffff8102fe29>] start_secondary+0x159/0x180

There's __drm_modeset_lock_all() which Daniel Vetter introduced for this
purpose. We can leverage that without reinventing anything. This patch
works with the latest kernel.

Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <[email protected]>
---

Dave: I don't see this in any of your trees yet. Bug is really annoying
when testing machine check code because the above stack dumps just repeat
endlessly until I manually hit the reset button

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
index 0c0c39bac23d..70dd2f4eb299 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
@@ -732,7 +732,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_setcmap(struct fb_cmap *cmap, struct fb_info *info)
int i, j, rc = 0;
int start;

- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return -EBUSY;
@@ -910,7 +912,9 @@ int drm_fb_helper_pan_display(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
int ret = 0;
int i;

- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ if (__drm_modeset_lock_all(dev, !!oops_in_progress)) {
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return -EBUSY;
--
2.1.0