Hi folks,
I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
(Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
cu
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
+49-151-27565287
MELAG Medizintechnik oHG Sitz Berlin Registergericht AG Charlottenburg HRA 21333 B
Wichtiger Hinweis: Diese Nachricht kann vertrauliche oder nur für einen begrenzten Personenkreis bestimmte Informationen enthalten. Sie ist ausschließlich für denjenigen bestimmt, an den sie gerichtet worden ist. Wenn Sie nicht der Adressat dieser E-Mail sind, dürfen Sie diese nicht kopieren, weiterleiten, weitergeben oder sie ganz oder teilweise in irgendeiner Weise nutzen. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, so benachrichtigen Sie bitte den Absender, indem Sie auf diese Nachricht antworten. Bitte löschen Sie in diesem Fall diese Nachricht und alle Anhänge, ohne eine Kopie zu behalten.
Important Notice: This message may contain confidential or privileged information. It is intended only for the person it was addressed to. If you are not the intended recipient of this email you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any form whatsoever. If you received this email in error please notify the sender by replying and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.
Hi Enrico,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
> working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
>
> https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
That's great.
Kamil mentioned that the scaler patches should be merged via the the
gpu subsystem:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg88582.html
,so I guess Phillip will handle it.
>
> (Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
What are the regressions you see?
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:05:41PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
> working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
>
> https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
>
> (Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
While it's useful to broadcast your work, please have some consideration
for the forum(s) you're doing that to.
The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
set of patches posted for further review. This cycle repeats.
When everyone is happy, the patches can be applied, or pulled from
a non-github git tree. (Kernel people generally don't like github.)
This is so that upstream kernel developers don't get too overloaded
with work that really should be done by downstream folk (imagine if
they had to rewrite every patch that came their way...)
Thanks.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 21:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit
:
> The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
> lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
> comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
> set of patches posted for further review. This cycle repeats.
This patchset is already in the queue, so nothing to be done here.
@Fabio, you simply have to be patient.
Nicolas
Nicolas,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Dufresne
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 21:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit
> :
>> The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
>> lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
>> comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
>> set of patches posted for further review. This cycle repeats.
>
> This patchset is already in the queue, so nothing to be done here.
> @Fabio, you simply have to be patient.
I am not sure why you are saying this as I was just explaining the
same to Enrico.